SUBJECTIVE PERCEPTION OF AN INDIVIDUAL WITHIN SOCIALISATION PROCESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2013vol2.551Keywords:
Method adaptation, personal character, socialization processAbstract
This a pilot study where the study method “Autoidentification and Identification Method According to Oral Portrayals of Character”. Contemporary psychological studies show that a person’s behaviour in social context is not only simple consequences of the objective conditions having effect on him or her, it significantly depends on subjective perception and interpretation of the aggregate of external events, i.e., determination of situation carried out by an individual. Autoidentification method according to oral portrayals of character (Эйдемиллер, 1973) was used for diagnosing the personality and image of “I” accentuation types. The pilot study involved two groups of adolescents; one group included adolescents with deviant behaviour (n=60, 39 boys, 21 girl) but the second group included adolescents without actual behaviour disorders (n= 60, 35 boys, 25 girls). The study allowed determination of differences between the results presented by both groups with constituting grounds for performing further empiric study with a larger selection of study in the future.Downloads
References
Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Ackerman, N.W. (1970). Family process. Basic Books: New York.
Bandura, A. & Walters, R.H., (1963). Social learning and personality development. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. In T. Urdan & F. Pajares (Eds.), Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. pp. 1–43. Information Age Publishing.
Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent – Child attachment and healthy Human development. New York. Basic Books. Latv. Boulbijs, Dž. (1998). Drošais pamats. Apgāds Rasa ABC.
Buceniece, E. (1995). Teleoloģijas modernās interpretācijas: E.Huserls, N. Hartmanis, V.Rozanovs, P.Rikērs, K. Vojtila. - Grām.: Mūžīgais un laicīgais. R.
Calkins, S. D., & Fox, N. A. (2002). Self-regulatory processes in early personality development: A multilevel approach to the study of childhood social withdrawal and aggression. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 477–498.
Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1998). Adapting tests for use in multiple languages and cultures. Social Indicators Research, 45, 153-171.
Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 1, 1-30.
Heider, F., (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Wiley, New York.
Raščevska, R., (2005). Psiholoģisko testu un aptauju konstruēšana un adaptācija. R., Izdevniecība RaKa.
Rutter, M., Silberg, J., O’Conner, T., & Siminoff, E. (1999). Genetics and child psychiatry: II. Empirical research findings. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, pp. 19–55.
Schunk, D. H. & Meece, J. L. (2006). Self-Efficacy Development in Adolescences. SelfEfficacy Beliefs of Adolescents. In T. Urdan & F. Pajares (Eds.) Information Age Publishing. pp. 71–96.
Leonhard, K. (1965). Kinderneurosen und Kinderpersonlichkeiten. Berlin.
Ļubenko, J. (2011). Pusaudžu pašefektivitāte, internalizētas un eksternalizētas problēmas ģimenes psiholoģiskās vides kontekstā. Longitudināls pētījums. LU Pedagoģijas un psiholoģijas fakultātes doktorantes J. Ļubenko promocijas darbs; Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte.
Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Translating tests: Some practical guidelines. European Psychologist, 1, 89-99.
Wiersma, W. (2000) .Research Methods in Education. A Pearson Education Company.
Бодалев, А. А., Обозов Н. Н., Столин В. В. (1981). О службе семьи. Психологический журнал, Т. 2. № 4.
Емельянов, Ю. Н. (1985). Активное социально-психологическое обучение. Л.: Изд- во ЛГУ
Личко, А. Е. (1983). Психопатии и акцентуации характера у подростков. М.: Медицина.
Обозов, Н. Н. (1990). Семейно-брачные и родственные отношения. Психология межличностных отношений. Киев.
Обозов, Н. Н., Обозова А. Н. (1982). Диагностика супружеских затруднений. Психологический журнал. Т. 3. № 2.
Петренко, В.Ф. (1983). Введение в экспериментальную психосемантику. Исследование форм репрезентации в обыденном сознании. М.: МГУ.
Хекхаузен, X. (Heckhausen Н.) (1985,1986). Деятельность и мотивация. Пер. с нем.; М.: Прогресс. Т. 2.
Чернов, А. П. (1979). Мысленный эксперимент..М.: Наука.
Эйдемиллер, Э.Г. (1996). Методы семейной диагностики и психотерапии. М.,СПб.: Фолиум.
Эйдемиллер, Э. Г. (1993). Особенности семейной психотерапии в подростковой психиатрической клинике, Психотерапия при неврозах и психических заболеваниях. Л.
Эйдемиллер, Э. Г., Юстицкис В. (2001). Психология и психотерапия семьи. 3-е изд. Серия «Золотой фонд психотерапии», СПб.: Питер.
