Reading as Cultural Capital and Social Interaction

Authors

  • Audronė Lapienienė Vytautas Magnus University
  • Natalija Mažeikienė Vytautas Magnus University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2015vol2.465

Keywords:

Bourdieu, cultural capital, reading, reading environment, reading skills, social interaction

Abstract

The article focuses on the social aspects of reading.Conceptual framework of cultural capital is usedin order to actualise the importance of sociocultural and socioeconomic factors in family and at school for the child’s reading. The research reveals complex and multifaceted development of children’s reading skills: different factors such as cultural environment, cultural activity, and cultural objects in family and at school (in the classroom and library) interact and increase the possibilities for the child to acquire and integrate social knowledge.Aim of the researchis to analyse the interplay between educational and social factors during formation of reading in pupils. The following objectives have been set out to reach this aim: 1) to perform literature review of reading as social interaction and cultural capital, social factors determining reading in children; 2) to reveal the interplay between educational and social factors during formation of the children’s reading habitus by conducting interviews with the expert focus group.Methods of the research:group interviews with 24 experts of reading – primary school teachers, authors of textbooks of Lithuanian language and reading comprehension for primary schools, publishers of textbooks for primary schools were conducted.

Author Biography

  • Natalija Mažeikienė, Vytautas Magnus University
    Social Work Department, Professor

References

Blumer, H. (1969). Society as Symbolic Interaction. In Arnold Rose (Ed.). Human Behavior and Social Processes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. The Handbook for Theory and Research forthe Sociology of Education. John G. Richardson (Ed.). Greenwood Publishing Group. Pp. 241-58.

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J-C. (1990). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Pp. 272.

Burgess, S. R. (2002). The influence of speech perception, oral language ability, the home literacy environment, and pre-reading knowledge on the growth of phonological sensitivity: A one-year longitudinal investigation. Reading and Writing, 15. Pp. 709–737.

Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to Qualitative research. Pp. 227.

Katsillis, J. and Rubinson, R. (1990). Cultural Capital, Student Achievement and Educational Reproduction: The Case of Greece. American Sociological Review, 55. pp. 270–279.

Leonavičius, V., Norkus Z., Tereškinas, A. (2005). Socialinio konflikto teorijos. Socialinės teorijos. Pp. 220.

Ruddell, R. (2005). Teaching children to read and write: Becoming an effective literacy teacher. Boston: Allyn& Bacon.

Sullivan, A. (2001). Cultural Capital and Educational Attainment. Sociology, 35 (4). Pp. 893-912.

Walczyk, J.J., Griffith-Ross, D.A. (2007). How important is reading skill fluency for comprehension? The Reading Teacher, 60. Pp. 560–569.

Downloads

Published

2015-05-17