Latvian Teachers on Primary School Pupils' Social Sustainability

Elga Drelinga; Sandra Zarina; Dzintra Iliško

doi:10.17770/sie2015vol2.443

Authors

Elga Drelinga Daugavpils University (LV)
Sandra Zarina Daugavpils University (LV)
Dzintra Iliško Daugavpils University (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2015vol2.443

Keywords:

primary school children, social sustainability, social and personal competency, teachers

Abstract

The aim of the study is to explore teachers’ view about a social responsibility of primary school teachers and pupils’ social sustainability as viewed by the teachers. Social sustainability defines responsible and wise decision making at present as a significant precondition for development of a sustainability-oriented society in the future, the bases of which is an efficient individual’s, society’s and environments’ interchange. Personal and a social competence is a significant component of social sustainability that fosters possibilities of each pupil’s individual development and interrelatedness, by providing solutions to the problems that arise in the pedagogical process. Research methodology used for the purpose of the study are focus group interviews (n = 45) that involve 234 teachers from all over Latvia. Research results indicate that teachers while expressing their opinion about the contemporary primary school children create a profile of their social sustainability. Among the most significant features of a profile of contemporary pupils, the teachers have mentioned such pupils’ values which are not acceptable for them. This indicates that teachers cannot trust and accept children’s role as equal partners in the learning process. This situation may create problems in reorienting education towards a competency-based learning process. Therefore, the authors have analyzed the opportunities for the teachers’ professional development by paying a deeper attention to an intergenerational relation in the context of social sustainability.

References

Alasuutari, P., Bickman, L., & Brannen, J. (2008). The SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods 21.Focus Groups. London: Sage Publications.

Badjanova, J., Dz., Ilisko, & E., Drelinga. (2013). Holistic Approach in Reorienting Teacher Education Towards the Aim of Sustainable Education: the Case Study from the Regional University in Latvia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, ISSN: 1877-0428.

Barbour, R.S., & Kitzinger, J. (1999). Developing Focus Group Research Introduction: the Challenge and Promise of Focus Groups. In: Barbour, R. S., Kitzinger, J. Developing Focus Group Research. London:Sage Publications. (pp. 1-20). http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/developing-focus-group-research/n1.xml [2011.05.02].

Brooks, G. & Brooks, M.(1999). Search of Understanding: The case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Brundiers, K., Wiek, A., & Redman, C.L. (2010). Real-World Learning Opportunities in Sustainability: From Classroom into the Real World. In: International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11, (4). (pp. 308-324). http://www.emeraldinsight.com/1467-6370.htm [2010.12.20].

Clavin, B. & Lewis, A. (2005). Focus Groups on Consumers’: Ethical Beliefs. In: Harrison, R., Newholm, T. & Shaw, D. (2005) The Ethical Consumer. London: Sage Publications. 173 - 187.

David, W. Stewart & Prem, N., (2007). Focus Groups: History, Theory, and Practice: Sage Publications.

Department of Education and Skills (2007). Sustainable Development: Our Commitment. www.dfes.gov.uk/aboutus/sd/ [2007.06.12].

Drelinga, E., & Krastiņa, E. (2012). Assessment of Primary School Learner’s Project Week in the Context of Sustainable Development. In: С. Жалован, Proceedings of International Scientific Conference Current Trends in the Concepts and Strategies of Lifelong Learning, Cант-Петербург, Россия, ISBN978-57434-0614-5.

Grabovska, R. (2006). Ilgtspējības principa īstenošana skolotāju izglītībā. [Implementation of the Principle of Sustainability in Teacher Education] Phd Thesis. Daugavpils: Daugavpils University.

Grabovska, R. (2011). Mācību Process Ilgtspējīgai Ekonomikai un Sabiedrībai: Gadījumai Izpēte Latvijas Kontekstā. [Study process for sustainable economic and society: Latvian case study] Daugavpils Universitātes 53.Starptautiskās zinātniskās konferences materiāli 2011.gada 13.-15.aprīlis. Daugavpils, Downloaded from http://dukonference.lv/public /proceedings_of_conf/53konf/pedagogija/Grabovska.pdf

Hicks, D. (2010). The Long Transition: Educating for Optimism and Hope in Troubled Times. 3rd Annual Conference of the UK Teacher Education Network for Education for Sustainable Development/ Global Citizenship, July 2010 1-28.

Hughes, D., DuMont, K. (1993). Using Focus Groups to Facilitate Culturally Anchored Research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21 (6): 775 – 806.

Iliško, Dz., Ignatjeva, S., & Mičule, I. (2010). Teachers as Researchers: Bringing Teachers’ Voice to the Educational Landscape. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 12 (1), 51-65 (ISSN 1691-4147). DOI: 10.2478/v10099-009-0046-x

Jupp, V. (Ed.) (2006). The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods. London: Sage Publications. (pp.122-123). Downloaded from: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/the-sage-encyclopediaof-social-science-research-methods/n82.xml?rskey=5OWXn6 [2011.04.30].

Kolb, B. (2008) Marketing Research: 8 Planning and Conducting Focus Groups. SAGE Research Methods Online. Sage Publications, Inc. 124-140 DOI: 10.4135/9780857028013

Krueger, R., Casey, M. (2000). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. (3rd edition) Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Miller, R. (1995). Educational Freedom for a Democratic Society: A Critique of National Goals, Standards, and Curriculum. Brandon, VT: Resource Center for Redesigning Education.

Miller, R.L., & Brewer, J. (Ed.). (2003). The A-Z of Social Research. London: Sage Publications. (pp. 121-123). Downloaded from http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/the-a-z-of-socialresearch/n41.xml?rskey=5OWXn6.

Munday, J. (2006). Identity in Focus: The use of Focus Groups to Study the Construction of Collective Identity. Sociology, 40,1, 89–105.

Noddings, N. (1998). Philosophy of Education. Colorado: Westview Press.

O'Sullivan, E. (1999). Transformative learning: Educational vision for the 21 st century. London, New York: Zed Books, In Association with University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

Pipere, A. (2011). Fokusgrupas [Focus groups] In: Martinsone, K. (Ed.) (2011). Ievads pētniecībā: Stratēģijas, Dizaini, Metodes. (pp.177-181) [Introduction in research: strategy, design and methodology] Rīga: Raka.

Posch, A., & Steiner, G. (2006). Integrating Research and Teaching on Innovation for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(3), 276-292, Downloaded from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/1467-6370.htm.

Salīte, I. (2002). Teachers’ Views on the Aim of Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Teacher Education and Training, 1, 68–80.

Salīte, I. (2006). Aim of Education in the Context of Present and Future Educational Issues: Perspective of Teachers. In: A. Pipere (Ed.). Education & Sustainable Development: First Steps toward Changes, 1, (pp. 390 - 407). Daugavpils: Daugavpils University Publishing House “Saule”.

Salīte, I. (2008). Educational Action Research for Sustainability: Constructing a Vision for the Future in Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10, 5–16.

Thoresen, V. (2004). Cultivating Sustainable Lifestyles. UNESCO: IEF Conference, Greece: University of Thessaloniki.

UN ESD (2004). DESD Draft International Implementation Scheme. Paris: UNESCO

Webster, K, & Johnson, C. (2010). Sense & Sustainability.Educating for a Circular Economics. UK: Ellen MacArthur Foundation.