KINAESTHETIC LEARNING STYLE AND ITS USAGE IN LEARNING PROCESS IN BASIC SCHOOL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3315Keywords:
holistic approach, kinaesthetic learning style, sustainable educationAbstract
The aim of the research is to explore the possibilities and methodological solutions of using kinaesthetic teaching style in the teaching/learning process in basic school and its impact on pupil involvement in learning activities and attainment of goals. Qualitative and quantitative methods - experienced teacher’s survey and student-trainee survey after observation and analysys of lessons at school are used during the study. It is concluded that: 1)the kinesthetic style of learning involves different forms - tactile, movement-based learning, warm-up and relaxation exercises; 2)it is applicable at all stages of education and in teaching/ learning and extra-curricular activities; 3) it is effective during the classroom if it is consistent with the age of the pupils and the learning content. The survey concluded that majority of surveyed teachers positively evaluate the kinesthetic teaching/ learning style and quite often apply it in their lessons according to their competence.
References
Bell, D.V.J. (2016). Twenty-first Century Education: Transformative Education for Sustainability and Responsible Citizenship. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 48 -56.
Bethere, D., Cupere I., Kaupužs A. u.c. (2016). Pusaudžu fiziskā, emocionālā un sociālā līdzsvara attīstība iekļaujošajā izglītībā. Rēzekne: Rēzeknes Tehnoloģiju akadēmija.
Fedels Č., Bialika M., Trilings B. (2017). Četru dimensiju izglītība.Lielvārde: Lielvārds.
Fleming, N., and Baume, D. (2006). Learning Styles Again: VARKing up the right tree!, Educational Developments, SEDA Ltd, Issue 7.4, 4-7.
Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind – The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. 10- anniversary edition. Basic Books.
Kauchak, D.P., Eggen, P.D. (1998). Learning and teaching: Research-based methods (3rd ed.), Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Kte’pi, B. M. (2016). VARK model. Salem Press Encyclopedia, 1-4.
Lengel, T., M Kuczala (2010). The Kinesthetic Classroom: Teaching and Learning Through Movement Corwin. California: A SAGE Company.
Lengel L. (2015). The Kinesthetic Classroom: Teaching and Learning through Movement. Retrieved from https://pottstownfoundation.org/media/33866/the-kinesthetic-classroom-handout_mike-kuczala.pdf
LIZDA, (2017). LIZDA diskutē, kā panākt kvalitatīvas mācību satura izmaiņas, LIZDA Vēstnesis 2017 (5) 10. -11. lpp.
Namsone D., Čakāne L. (2015). What lesson observation data reveal about the changes in teaching science and mathematics. Retrieved from http://telerehabilitation.lv/sites/default/files/ESERA%202015%20stundas%20POSTER.pdf.
Perkins, D. (2006). Constructivism and Troublesome Knowlwdge. In: Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding:Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowlwdge. Ed. Jan Meyer et.all.New York. Routledge, p. 33-47.
Pipere, A., Iliško, Dz., Mičule, I. (2015). Ilgstpējīga attīstība – no zināšanām uz darbību. Palīgs skolām un skolotājiem. Daugavpils: Daugavpils Univeristātes Akadēmiskais apgāds “Saule”.
Pipere, A. (2011). Datu analīze kvalitatīvajā pētījumā. In Martinsone, K. (ed.) Ievads pētniecībā: stratēģijas, dizaini, metodes. Rīga: Raka, 220–243.
Pipere, A., Mičule, I. (2014). Mathematical Identity for a Sustainable Future: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 5-31.
Rutka, L., Ušča, S., Žogla, I., Kriņģele, I. (2016). Pusaudžu fiziskais, garīgais, sociālais līdzsvars kā attīstības aktualitāte. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Society. Integration. Education. Volume II, 319-329.
Saeima (2010). Latvijas ilgtspējīgas attīstības stratēģija 2030. gadam.
Salīte, I., Drelinga, E., Iliško, Dz., Zariņa, S., Oļehnoviča, E. (2016). Sustainability from the transdisciplinary perspective: An action research strategy for continuing education course development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(2) p.135-152.
Yamada, K., Nabeshima, T. (2003). Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/TrkB Signaling in Memory Processes . Journal of Pharmacological Sciences. 91 (4). 267-270.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
