ASSESSMENT OF TEACHERS’ WORK – EXPECTATIONS AND REALITY: THE CASE STUDY OF REZEKNE

Authors

  • Ginta Kronberga Latvia University of Agriculture (LV)
  • Ieva Dzene Latvia University of Agriculture (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3260

Keywords:

evaluation of teachers' work, teachers' expectations

Abstract

Teachers play a very important role in the education system, as these people are subject to the requirements, constraints, and changes imposed by the education system and, at the same time, they are responsible for the quality education of pupils. Teachers are most directly confronted with the reality in existing educational institutions (in co-operation with colleagues, local authorities, parents of pupils, employers and acting in accordance with legislation) and with the shortcomings in the education system. The educational system in Latvia faces new challenges: liquidation and reorganization of schools, work in combined classes, the need to adapt and respond to educational system reforms. Teachers’ work is subject to constant change; but is it evaluated according to efforts teachers are making? The aim of the article is to investigate the expectations and reality of teachers of primary schools in Rezekne in relation to the assessment of their work. The paper uses a combined research approach: a qualitative research method – semi-structured interviews and a quantitative survey questionnaire. The teachers' expectations regarding job evaluation are related to pay, equity, support, and changes in the education system. Teachers of Rezekne district primary schools are least satisfied with the assessment of the work by the state - teachers are not satisfied with wages and unfairness. The most important thing for teachers is the assessment of pupils, employers and school administrations, as well as parents of pupils.

 

 

References

Aslanargun, E. (2015). Teachers’ expectations and school administration: Keys of better communication in schools. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 60, 17-34. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1076650.pdf

Blyton, P., Jenkins J. (2007) Key Concepts in Work. SAGE Publications. 246 p.

Geske, A., Ozola, A. (2013). Skolotāju apmierinātība ar darbu – TALIS 2013 pētījuma rezultāti. Latvijas Universitāte. Retrieved from http://journals.ru.lv/index.php/SIE/article/viewFile/442/442

Good, T.L. (2008). 21st Century Education: A Reference Handbook . Retrieved from http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/education/n27.xml

Guide to Assessment (2015). Scottish Qualifications Authority. Glasgow, p. 3. Internetresurss.

Ministru kabinets (2010). Noteikumi par profesiju klasifikatoru, profesijai atbilstošiem pamatuzdevumiem un kvalifikācijas pamatprasībām un Profesiju klasifikatora lietošanas un aktualizēšanas kārtību (2010): MK 2010.gada 18.maija noteikumi Nr.461 Retrieved from http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=210806

Lunenburg, F.C. (2011). Expectancy Theory of Motivation: Motivating by Altering expctations. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, Vol. 15,No1. Retrieved from http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Luneneburg,%20Fred%20C%20Expectancy%20Theory%20%20Altering%20Expectations%20IJMBA%20V15%20N1%202011.pdf

Papageorge, N.W., Gershenson, S., Kang, K. (2016). Teacher Expectations Matter. Germany, Institute for the Study of Labor. 68.lpp. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp10165.pdf

Parijat, P., Bagga, S. (2014). Victor Vroom`s Expectancy Theory of Motivation – An Evaluation. International Research Journal of Business and Management, Vol. No 7, Issue 9. Retrieved from http://irjbm.org/irjbm2013/Sep2014/Paper1.pdf

Peršēvica, A. (2013). Vidusskolu skolotāju apmierinātība ar darbu un tās mijsakarības ar izglītības kvalitāti. Promocijas darbs. Retrieved from https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/bitstream/handle/7/4908/38759-Aija_Persevica_2012.pdf?sequence=1

Ravelli, B., Webber, M. (2010). Exploring Sociology: a Canadian Perspective. Canada: Pearson Prentice Hall, 650 lpp.

Rāta, A., Bite, D., Nāckalne, S., Barisa, L., Janmere, L., Krūzmētra, M. (2013). Izglītības darbinieku vajadzības nodarbinātības stabilitātes un cienīga darba apstākļu nodrošināšanai un šo jautājumu aktualizēšanai kolektīvajos līgumos. Jelgava: Latvijas Lauksaimniecības universitāte, 128 lpp.

Robinson, C., McCartan, K. (2016). Real World Research. John Wiley & Sons UK, 513 lpp.

Skaalvik E.M., Skaalvik. S. (2011) Teaching and Teacher Education. Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. An International Journal of Research and Studies, Vol. 27, Issue 6.

Vintiša, K. (2010). Latvijas Darba devēju konfederācijas Cilvēkresursu plānošanas un novērtēšanas metodes mazam un vidējam uzņēmumam. Retrieved from http://www.lddk.lv/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Cilv%C4%93kresursu-pl%C4%81no%C5%A1anas-un-nov%C4%93rt%C4%93%C5%A1anas-metodes-mazam-un-vid%C4%93jam-uz%C5%86%C4%93mumam.pdf

Downloads

Published

2018-05-25

How to Cite

Kronberga, G., & Dzene, I. (2018). ASSESSMENT OF TEACHERS’ WORK – EXPECTATIONS AND REALITY: THE CASE STUDY OF REZEKNE. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 2, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3260