TEACHER IN CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION LEARNING PROCESS

Authors

  • Ireta Čekse Institute of Educational Research Faculty of Education, Psychology and Art University of Latvia (LV)
  • Andrejs Geske Institute of Educational Research Faculty of Education, Psychology and Art University of Latvia (LV)
  • Olga Pole Institute of Educational Research Faculty of Education, Psychology and Art University of Latvia (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3127

Keywords:

citizenship education, comparative studie, ICCS, teacher, paradigm shift, learning process

Abstract

The recent reforms in the Latvian general education curriculum along with a school network reorganization have brought new attention  to the issues related to a teacher education and the level of professionalism in everyday teaching work. Soviet-era education and work experience in diverse political and education systems (under the Soviet rule and after the restoration of independence) are factors that should be taken into account when analyzing the teacher in the citizenship education learning process. For the needs of this Paper, the authors used the data of the IEA ICCS 2016 (International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement International Civic and Citizenship Study 2016) teachers who teach citizenship education-related school subjects (n=249) and their students (N=3224, Grade 8, average age from 13 to 14). To process the data, the authors usedclusters, correlations, regression analysis and descriptive statistics.The aim of this Paper is to study what the teacher is like in the process of citizenship education. The findings allow making two conclusions: First, the teacher’s personality, experience and networking skills plays an important role; Second, the popular assumption among both professionals and nonprofessionals  that cooperation between an eighth-grade teachers and parents leads to a better student achievements is false.

 

References

Ainley, J., Schulz, W., & Friedman, T. (Eds.). (2012). ICCS 2009 Encyclopedia. The Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

Blūma, D. (2016). Skolotāju izglītība Latvijā paradigmu maiņas kontekstā (1991-2000). Monogrāfiju sērija IZglīības pētniecība Latvijā Nr.9. Rīga: LU PPMF Izglītības pētniecības institūts.

Braslavsky, C. (2003). Teacher Education for Living together in the 21st Century. Journal of Research in International Education, 2(2), 167-183.

Channell, L., & Opra-Nadi, L. A. (2014). Collective Teacher Efficacy and Student Academic Achievement. NAAAS & Affiliates Conference Monographs 2014, (pp. 85-161).

OECD. (2014, 01 05). Talis 2013 Results: An international Perspective on Teaching and learning. OECD Publishing.

Reeves, P. M., Pun, W. H., & Chung, K. S. (2017, October). Influence of Teacher Collaboration on Job Satisfaction and Student Achievement. Teaching & Teacher Education, 67, 227-236.

Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Bruno, L., Gabriella, A., & Tim, F. (2017). Becoming to Citizens in a Changing World. IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2016. International Report. Amsterdam: The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

Schulz, W., Frallion, J., Ainley, J., Losito, B., & Kerr, D. (2008). Internacional Civic and Citizenship Education Study. Assessment Framework. Amsterdam: The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).

Downloads

Published

2018-05-25

How to Cite

Čekse, I., Geske, A., & Pole, O. (2018). TEACHER IN CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION LEARNING PROCESS. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 2, 84-92. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3127