THE PARTICIPATION OF PARENTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PUPILS' READING SKILLS AND INTERESTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2016vol2.1402Keywords:
literacy, 6-11 years old pupils, parentsAbstract
The skill of reading and comprehension of a written text will have a significant impact on the quality of life: during school years the reading effectiveness ensures optimal
learning conditions, but in the long term – inclusion in today's economical, social and cultural processes. The studies on pupils' literacy (OECD, ADORE, etc.) show that the average level of literacy is not high. It is necessary to pay more attention to the pupils' reading skill at the primary school, as well as to the development of reading interests and motivation. Not only teachers but also parents should be actively involved in this process.
The aim of the paper – on the basis of literature analysis and obtained questionnaire results of the project „Reading with Ease and Fun – REF”, 2015-1-BG01-KA201-014354, to draw attention to the role of parents and their responsibility in the development of child's reading skill and interest.
Downloads
References
ALIRANA (2015). Labas un nostiprinātas valodas prasmes sākumskolā. Pieejams http://www.alirana.lv/blogs/category2
Artelt, C. (2001). Lesekompetenz: Textkompetenz und Ergebnisse. In J. Baumert (Hrg.), PISA 2000. Basiskompetenz von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich (S. 69–137). Oplanden: Lesk + Budrich.
Dearing, E., McCartney, K., Weiss, H. B., Kreider, H., & Simpkins, S. (2004). The promotive effects of family educational involvement for low-income children's literacy. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 445–460.
Fišers, R. (2005). Mācīsim bērniem domāt. R., RaKa.
Fryer, R.G. Jr. & Levitt, S.D. (2006). The Black-White Test Score Gap Through Third Grade. American Law and Economic Review 8(2), pp.249-281.
Garbe, C. (2007). Lesen – Sozialisation – Geschlecht. Geschlechterdifferenzierende Leseforschung und -Förderung. In A. BertschiKaufmann, ed. Lesekompetenz – Leseleistung – Leseförderung. Grundlagen, Modelle und Materialien. Seelze: Klett und Balmer; Friedrich Kallmeyer, pp. 66–82.
Geske, A. & Ozola, A.(2007). Skolēnu sasniegumi lasītprasmē Latvijā un pasaulē. Rīga, LU Akadēmiskais apgāds.
Gurung, A., & Schwartz, B. (2009). Optimizing teaching and learning practicing pedagogical research. Willey-Blackwell.
Hart, B. & Risley, T.R. (1995). Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Hood, M., Conlon, E., & Andrews, G. (2008). Preschool home literacy practices and children's literacy development: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 252–271.
Horvat, E. M., Weininger, E. B., & Lareau, A. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 319–351.
Lasītprasmes mācīšana Eiropā: konteksts, rīcībpolitika un prakse (2011). Pieejams http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/Eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/130LV.pdf
Mullis, I.V.S. et al. (2007). PIRLS 2006 international report: IEA’s progress in international reading literacy study in primary schools in 40 countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center.
OECD (2010). PISA 2009 Results: Overcoming Social Background – Equity in Learning Opportunities and Outcomes. Volume II. Paris: OECD.
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). Parent involvement in homework: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78, 1039–1101.
Reardon, S. (2011). The Widening Academic Achievement Gap Between the Rich and the Poor: New Evidence and Possible Explanation. In Whither Opportunity? Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children’s Life Chances. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 91-116.
Schneider, W., & Hasselhorn, M. (Hrsg.) (2008). Handbuch der Pädagogischen Psychologie, Band 10. Götingen; Bern; Wien; Paris: Hogrefe, S. 771.
Sénéchal, M., & Young, L. (2008). The effect of family literacy interventions on children’s acquisition of reading from kindergarten to grade 3: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 78, 880–907. doi:10.3102/0034654308320319
Skujiņa, V., Anspoka, Z. u.c. (2011). Lingvodidaktikas terminu skaidrojošā vārdnīca. Jelgava: Jelgavas tipogrāfija.
Torppa, M., Poikkeus, A.M., Laakso, M.L., Eklund, K., & Lyytinen, H. (2006). Predicting delayed letter knowledge development and its relation to grade 1 reading achievement among children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1138–1142.
Upeniece, I., Šenne, A.(2014). Notikusi konference valodu skolotājiem par lasītprasmes veicināšanu. Pieejams http://visc.gov.lv/vispizglitiba/saturs/dokumenti/maseminari/2014/20141204_par_lasitprasm_konferenci.pdf
Vanags, E. (2014). Pētījumi: jo regulārāk lasīsi priekšā bērnam bērnībā, jo labāk viņam veiksies karjeras veidošanā. Pieejams http://www.mammamuntetiem.lv/articles/30836/petijumi-jo-regularak-lasisi-prieksa-bernam-berniba-jo-labak-vinam-veiksies-karjeras-veidosana/
Zumbach, J., & Mandl, H. (2008). Pädagogische Psychologie in Theorie und Praxis. Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag GmbH & Co, S. 353.
Xu, J. (2012). Predicting students' homework environment management at the secondary school level. Educational Psychology, 32, 183–200.
Эльконин, Д. Б. (1998). Развитие устной и письменной речи учащихся. Москва: Асадемия.
