Kristi Kiilu, Urve Läänemets, Katrin Kalamees-Ruubel


The current research on music teachers’ professional skills of structuring and developing supportive learning environments for implementation of National Curricula is the third in line, based on a pilot project of 2013, a study of 2015. The research problem for all the three studies was “How do music teachers at general comprehensive schools comprehend supportive learning environment and opportunities for their design and development. The data collected and analysed (n=70) in 2019 allow to follow the development of teachers’ professional abilities and creativity at structuring and designing supportive environments for learning music at general comprehensive schools and kindergartens. If smartly designed and created, they promote learning, lead to higher academic achievement and contribute to students’ self-esteem. The study has also provided information about teachers’ professional approaches, real environments at schools and the needs for improvement. The analysis of the data, providing some insights allows to make recommendations for teacher training, for curriculum design at school level and offer suggestions for cultural activities in local communities supporting cohesion and identity building in society. Current turbulent times require increasingly wider competences and creativity from teachers for making music education socially meaningful.



creativity; music education; professional skills; social impact of music education; supportive learning environments; teachers’ comprehension of environment structures

Full Text:



Aldridge, J. M., & Frazer, B. J. (2008). Outcomes-Focused Learning Environments: Determinants and Effects. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Best, J. W. (1970). Research in Education. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1997). Research Methods in Education. Fourth Edition. London: Routledge.

Creamer, E. G. (2017). An introduction to fully integrated mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Department of Basic Education. (2015). The effective use of textbooks in the classroom. The Ministry of Education of the Republic of South Africa. Retrieved from

Eerola, P. S., & Eerola, T. (2014). Extended music education enhances the quality of school life. Music Education Research. 16(1), 88–104.

Elomaa, E. (2009). Oppikirja eläköön! Teoreettisia ja käytännön näkökohtia kielten Oppimateriaalien uudistamiseen. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University Printing House.

Guerrettaz, A. M., & Johnston, B. (2013). Materials in the classroom ecology. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 779–796. Retrieved from

Guest, G. (2013). Describing mixed methods research: An alternative to typologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7, 141–151. Retrieved from

Eesti Vabariigi valitsus. (2011). Gümnaasiumi riiklik õppekava (National Curriculum forupper secondary schools. In Estonian). Retrieved from

Eesti Vabariigi valitsus. (2011). Põhikooli riiklik õppekava (National curriculum for basic schools. In Estonian). Retrieved from

Hall, R. A. (2015). Critical Thinking in Online Discussion Boards: Transforming an Anomaly. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, Spring 2015, Volume 81-3, 21–28.

Hallam, S. (2010). The power of music: Its impact on the intellectual, social and personal development of children and young people. International Journal of Music Education, 28(3), 269–289. Retrieved from

Harsh, S., & Young, J. (2015). Using varied Learning Environments for Deeper Learning and Student Mastery of Complex Content. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, Spring 2015, Volume 81-3, 7–16.

Heller, D. E. (2001). The states and public higher education policy: Affordability, access and accountability. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2014). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Kubota, R., & Austin, T. (2007). Critical approaches to world language education in the United States: An introduction. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 5(2&3), 73–83.

Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Laanemets, U., & Rostovtseva, M. (2015). Developing supportive learning environments. Psychology Research, 5(1), 32–41. David Publishing.

Läänemets, U. (2013, 2017). Didactica minima. (In Estonian). Tallinn: Juura.

Läänemets, U., Kalamees-Ruubel, K, Kiilu, K., & Sepp, A. (2018). Curriculum Development Considering Formal, Non-formal and Informal Education. In Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, II, 286–295.

Meador, D. (2019). Basic Strategies for Providing Structure in the Classroom. Retrieved from

Ruuska, H. (2015). Opettajan ei tarvitse tehdä työvälineitään. In H. Ruuska, M. Löytönen & A. Rutanen (Eds.), Laatua! Oppimateriaalit muuttuvassa tietoympäristössä, 41–46. Porvoo: Bookwell Oy.

Salomon, G. (2006). The systemic vs. analytic study of complex learning environments. In J. Ellen and R.E. Clark (Eds.). Handling Complexity in Learning Environments: Theory and Research, 255–274. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Tuomi, J., & Sarajärvi, A. (2009). Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi (5th ed.). Helsinki: Tammi.

Vanha, L. (2017). Teachers’ perspectives on the role of textbooks in English language learning and teaching in Finland. Master thesis. Faculty of Humanities, University of Oulu. Retrieved from

Vuorinen, K. (2015). Kieltenoppimateriaalit. In H. Ruuska, M. Löytönen & A. Rutanen (Eds.). Laatua! Oppimateriaalit muuttuvassa tietoympäristössä, 117–128. Porvoo: Bookwell Oy.

Wilson, B. (1995). Metaphors for instruction: Why we talk about learning environments. Educational Technology, 35(5), 25–30. Retrieved from

Zandvliet, D. B., & Fraser, B. (Eds.) (2019). Thirty Years of Learning Environments. Looking Back and Looking Forward. Series: Advances in Learning Environment Research, 11. Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.



  • There are currently no refbacks.