Principles of Sampling in Educational Research in Higher Education

Andreas Ahrens, Jelena Zascerinska

Abstract


Innovation and creativity in European society are fostered via a dynamic and flexible European higher education based on the integration between education and research at all levels (Communiqué, 2009). The synergy between education and research is effeciently driven via educational research. Sampling as an element of the educational research has a two-fold role: sample size is inter-connected with statistical analysis of the data and generalisation. Against this background, little attention has been given to principles of sampling in educational research. The research question is as follows: what principles form sampling in educational research? The aim of the research is to analyse scientific literature and work out principles of sampling in educational research underpinning elaboration of a new research question for further studies in educational research. The present research involves a process of analysing the meaning of the key concept “principle”. In the empirical study, explorative research was employed. Interpretive research paradigm was used. The empirical study involved six experts from different countries in February 2013 – July 2014. The findings of the research allow drawing the conclusions on the elaborated principles of sampling in educational research. Directions of further research are proposed.

Keywords


Educational Research; Higher Education; Interdisciplinary Research; Principle; Principles of Sampling; Sample; Sampling

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahrens, A., Zaščerinska, J. (2014a). Factors that Influence Sample Size in Educational Research. 2014 ATEE Spring University proceedings Changing Education in a Changing Society, pp. 19-32. Published by Klaipeda University, Lithuania.

Ahrens, A., Zaščerinska, J. (2014b). A Framework for Selecting Sampe Size in Educational Research on e-Business Application. Mohammad S. Obaidat, Andreas Holzinger, Marten van Sinderen and Peter Dolog (Eds), In Proceedings of ICE-B 2014 11th International Conference on E-Business, Vienna, Austria, 28-30 August 2014, pp. 31-38. Publisher: SciTePress - Science and Technology Publications. Printed in Portugal.

Bartlett, J.E., Kotrlik J.W., Higgins, C.C. (2001). Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, 43-50. Spring 2001.

Beļickis, I., Blūma, D., Koķe, T., Markus, D., Skujiņa, V. (vad.), Šalme, A. (2000). Pedagoģijas terminu skaidrojošā vārdnīca. Termini latviešu, angļu, vācu, krievu valodā. Rīga: “Zvaigzne ABC”.

Coe, R. (1996). Sampling Size Determination in Farmer Surveys. ICRAF Research Support Unit Technical Note No 4. ICRAF World Agroforestry Centre Nairobi, Kenya. 11 pp.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrsion, K. (2003). Research Methods in Education. London and New York: Routledge/Falmer Taylor & Francis Group.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry,12(2), 219-245, (2006).

Hunter, A., Brewer, J. (2003). Multimethod Research in Sociology. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (Eds). Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, p. 577-593. London, New Delhi: Sage Publications, International Educational & Professional Publisher. Thousand Oaks.

Kamau, Guandaru, C., Kariuki, Nduati, S. .(2012). Factors Influencing Sample Size for Internal Audit Evidence Collection in the Public Sector in Kenya. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics. Mar.-April. 2012 | Vol.1 | Issue 2|42-49.

Kroplijs, A., Raščevska, M. (2004). Kvalitatīvās pētniecības metodes sociālajās zinātnēs. Rīga: RaKa.

Kumar R (1996). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners. Sage Publications, London.

Lopez, C., Salmeron, J. (2011). A Framework for Classifying Risks in ERP Maintenance Projects. Proceedings of International Conference on e-Business (ICE-B 2011), July 18-21 2011, Seville, Spain,201-204. Publisher: SciTePress - Science and Technology Publications.

Maslo, E. (2007). Transformative Learning Space for Life-Long Foreign Languages Learning. In International Nordic-Baltic Region Conference of FIPLV Innovations in Language Teaching and Learning in the Multicultural Context, 38-46, Rīga: SIA "Izglītības soļi".

Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative Content Analysis. In U. Flick, E. Von Kardoff and I. Steinke (Eds). A Companion to Qualitative Research, pp. 266-269. SAGE, UK, Glasgow.

Mayring, Philip (2007). On Generalization in Qualitatively Oriented Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(3), Art. 26, 1-8.

McMIllan, J.H. (1996). Educational Research Fundamentals for the Consumer. Second Edition. Virginia Commonwealth University, HarperCollins College Publishers.

Minkkinen, P. (2008). Theory of Sampling: General principles for sampling heterogeneous materials. Paper presented at Reliable Data for Waste Management September 25-26, 2008, Vienna, Austria.

Morse, J.M. (1991). Strategies for sampling. In: Morse J.M. ed., Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue, pp. 127–145. Sage, Newbury Park, California.

Okoli, C., Pawlovski, S. (2004). The Delphi Method as a Research Tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information and Management, 42(1), 15-29, (2004).

Phillips, D. (2006). Comparative Education: method. Research in Comparative and International Education, Volume 1, Number 4, 304-319, (2006).

Reich, K. (2005). Systemisch-konstruktivistische Pädagogik. Weinheim u.a., Beltz.

Repko, A. (2012). Interdisciplinary Research Process and Theory Second Edition. SAGE.

Smith, P. L. (2008). An Introduction to General Sampling Principles: Reducing Bias and Variation in Bulk Sampling. Journal of GXP Compliance Vol. 12, Issue 4, Jul 2008, 60-65.

Summers, S. (1991) Selecting the sample for a research study. J Post Anesth Nurs. Oct;6(5):355-8.

Sweeney, D. (2013). Statistics: The Normal Distribution. In Encyclopædia Britannica.

Taylor, P.C., & Medina, M.N.D. (2013). Educational Research Paradigms: From Positivismto Multiparadigmatic. The Journal of Meaning-Centered Education. Volume 1, Article 2.

The Bologna Process 2020 - The European Higher Education Area in the new decade. (2009). Communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education, Leuven and Louvain-la-Neuve, 28-29 April 2009.

Yount, W.R. (2006). Research Design and Statistical Analysis for Christian Ministry. Publisher: Dr. Rick Yount.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2015vol1.310

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.