The Inclusive Education Process Implementation Problems and Solutions to the Teachers' Point of View


  • Mārīte Rozenfelde Rezeknes University of Applied Sciences (LV)



inclusive education, inclusive society, support system, teachers’ attitude in the aspect of inclusion


Class teachers are the main resource to reach the goal of implementation of inclusive education in mainstream educational institutions. There will be different views and actions of teachers in any educational institution and we should not expect that everybody think and act in the same way. To implement inclusion in school a lot depends on teachers’ attitudes toward pupils with different needs, on whether teachers have necessary skills, competences, knowledge, pedagogical approaches, techniques, methods, materials that help to deal with diversity, whether a teacher has the necessary support inside and outside the school. In the article the issues of how teachers of mainstream schools in Latvia judge their ability to be inclusive; what challenges they see in their work and what kind of solutions they see on local and national level are emphasized. The article describes the overview study done by the author and it presents the findings and results of the study, the resolution of the scientific conference „Teacher in Inclusive Education” to promote implementation of inclusive education on national level supported by the participants of the conference.


Download data is not yet available.


Ainscow, M., Cesar, M. (2006). Inclusive Education Ten Years After Salamanca: Setting the Agenda. Pieejams vai (sk.10.01.2014.).

Booth, T., Ainscow, M.(2002). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol, UK: Centre for studies on Inclusive Education.

Būts, T., Einskovs M. (2000). Indekss iekļaujošai izglītībai – mācīšanās un līdzdalības attīstīšana skolās. Pieejams: ieklj_klase.pdf (sk. 10.01.2014.).

Dyson, A., Gallannaugh F., Millward A. (2002). Making space in the standards agenda: developing inclusive practices in schools. Pieejams: (sk.10.01.2014.).

Education White paper. (2001). Special Needs Education. Building an inclusive education and training system. Pieejams: (sk.10.01.2014).

Eiropas speciālās izglītības attīstības aģentūra. (2007). Mācību sasniegumu vērtēšana iekļaujošā mācību vidē.

Guidelines for Inclusion: Ensuring Access to Education for All. (2005). France: Paris. UNESCO.

Hannell, G. (2006). Identifying children with special needs. Corwin Press. California.

Integratīva mācību metodika adaptācijai sociālajā vidē kognitīvo un kustību funkciju uzlabošanai. (2012). I., II., III. daļas. Rīga: RPIVA.

Inclusive education and effective classroom. Practices. (2003). Summary report. Brussels: EADSNE.

National Association of State Boards of Education. (1990). Winning ways. Washington: DC.

North, M., McKeown, S. (2005). Meeting SEN in the Curriculum: ICT.D. Fulton publishers.

Pliners, J., Buhvalovs, V. (2002). Skolas izglītojošā vide. Rīga: Izglītības soļi

Turnbull, R.,Turnbull, A., Shank, M., Smith, S.J. (2004) Exceptional Lives. Special Education in todays schools. USA: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Winter, J.A. (2003). The Development of the Disability Rights Movement as a Social Problem Solver. Pieejams: (sk.10.01.2014.).




How to Cite

Rozenfelde, M. (2015). The Inclusive Education Process Implementation Problems and Solutions to the Teachers’ Point of View. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 3, 106-117.