THE EFFECTS OF THE LOWERED COMPULSORY SCHOOL ENTRY AGE ON THE CURRICULUM

Authors

  • Ilona Tandzegolskiene-Bielaglove Vytautas Magnus University
  • Nijole Ciuciulkiene Vytautas Magnus University
  • Ingrida Kvediene Vytautas Magnus University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2023vol1.7154

Keywords:

curriculum change, lowered compulsory school entry age, primary education

Abstract

The question at what age a child should start compulsory education raises debates both in the scientific and public interest contexts. This topic is also relevant all over the world, but a uniform answer is still not found, so the problem of the research emerges - the disclosure of the prerequisites for the change of the educational content during early primary education. The article raises questions related to the possibilities and assumptions of early school entry age for children and the structuring of educational content. 12 education experts and 6 preschool and primary education pedagogues participated in the study. Qualitative research methodology was chosen for this study: semi-structured interview and group discussion methods. During the research, 4 main topics were distinguished. They are as follows: relevance of lowering the school entry age of children; changes in the educational content when the educational age is advanced; characteristics of age change; change processes taking place in the education system. The research findings state that in order to lower the compulsory school age and achieve quality education, it is necessary to reform the educational content: educational programs must be reviewed, reasoned and changed, educational methods and tools must be selectedin a more detailed way, new educational environments created and developed, the evaluation system has to be changed, and teachers must be properly trained to work with younger children.

 

Author Biography

  • Nijole Ciuciulkiene, Vytautas Magnus University
    VMU Academy of Education, Teacher Training Institute, Department of Education Policy and ManagementAssociate professor, dr.

References

Altwicker-Hamori, S., & Kollo, J. (2012). Whose children gain from starting school later? – Evidence from Hungary. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(5), 459–488.

Bassok, D., & Reardon, S. F. (2013). „Academic redshirting” in kindergarten. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(3), 283–297.

Clarke, P., Crawford, C., Steele, F., & Vignoles, A. (2015). Revisiting fixed – and random – effects models: Some considerations for policy-relevant education research. Education Economics, 23(3), 259–277.

Datar, A., & Gottfried, M. A. (2015). School entry age and children’s social-behavioral skills: Evidence from a national longitudinal study of U. S. Kindergartners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(3), 333–353.

Dee, T. S., & Sievertsen, H. H. (2018). The gift of time? School starting age and mental health. Health Economics, 27(5), 781–802.

Eurydice. (2017). Compulsory Education in Europe – 2017/2018. Eurydice Facts and Figures. Luxemburg: Publications Office in the European Union.

Fortner, C. K., & Jenkins, J. M. (2017). Kindergarten redshirting: Motivations and spillovers using census-level data. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 38, 44–56.

Frazier-Norbury, C., Gooch, D., Baird, G., Charman, T., Simonoff, E., & Pickles, A. (2015). Younger children experience lower levels of language competence and academic progress in the first year of school: Evidence from a population study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(1), 65–73.

Görlitz, K., Penny, M., & Tamm, M. (2022). The long-term effect of age at school entry on cognitive competencies in adulthood. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 194, 91-104.

Guo, C., Wang, X., & Meng, C. (2023). Does the early bird catch the worm? Evidence and interpretation on the long-term impact of school entry age in China. China Economic Review, 77, 101900.

Herbst, M., & Strawinski, P. (2016). Early effects of an early start: Evidence from lowering the school starting age in Poland. Journal of Policy Modeling, 38(2), 256–271.

Jankowska, A. M., Takagi, A., Bogdanowicz, M., & Jonak, J. (2014). Parenting style and locus of control, motivation, and school adaptation among students with borderline intellectual functioning. Current issues in personality psychology, 2(4).

Jerrim, J., Lopez-Agudo, L. A., & Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O. D. (2022). Grade retention and school entry age in Spain: a structural problem. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 34(3), 331-359.

Le, K., & Nguyen, M. (2021). Education and political engagement. International Journal of Educational Development, 85, 102441.

Lubotsky, D., & Kaestner, R. (2016). Do “Skills beget skills”? Evidence of the effect of kindergarten entrance age on the evolution of cognitive and non-cognitive skill gaps in childhood. Economics of Education Review, 53, 194–206.

Morrow, R. L., Garland, E. J., Wright, J. M., Maclure, M., Taylor, S., & Dormuth, C. R. (2012). Influence of relative age on diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder in children. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 184(7), 755–762.

OECD. (2013). Education at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2017a). Education in Lithuania, reviews of national policies for education. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2017b). Starting Strong 2017: Key OECD indicators on early childhood education and care. OECD Publishing.

PIRLS. (2017). PIRLS 2016. Ataskaita 4 klasė. Tarptautinis skaitymo gebėjimų tyrimas. Vilnius: Nacionalinis egzaminų centras.

PISA. (2016). OECD PISA 2015 ataskaita. Vilnius: Nacionalinis egzaminų centras.

Ponzo, M., & Scoppa, V. (2014). The long-lasting effects of school entry age: Evidence from Italian students. Journal of Policy Modeling, 36(3), 578–599.

UNESCO. (2013). Training Tools for Curriculum Development a Resource Pack. Geneva, IBE.

UNICEF. (2019). A world ready to learn: Prioritizing quality early childhood education. Global Report on Pre-primary Education.

Valantinas, A. (2011). Ikimokyklinis ugdymas: ką apie jo poveikį vaiko raidai sako tyrimų duomenys? Švietimo problemos analizė, 4(54). Vilnius: Švietimo aprūpinimo centras.

Zabalcke, R., & Grazyte, A. (2017). Privalomojo ugdymo ankstinimas – kodėl tai svarbu? Švietimo problemos analizė, 9(165). Vilnius: Švietimo aprūpinimo centras.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-03