LEARNING OUTCOMES APPROACH IMPLEMENTATION: FUTURE PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHERS’ DIDACTIC COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT

Authors

  • Rasma Jansone Latvian Academy of Sport Education
  • Andra Fernāte Latvian Academy of Sport Education
  • Inta Immere Latvian Academy of Sport Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2014vol3.698

Keywords:

learning outcomes approach, physical education teacher qualification, study programs

Abstract

Education process in Latvian Academy of Sport Education (LASE) is directed to provide all education level physical education (PE) teacher adequate preparation. Everyone in any country has the right to a quality education, which is determined by the contribution in student preparation, teacher qualification, learning environment organization, investment in education, and the planned outcomes. Contextual approach to quality is not determined; it depends on the creativity and continuous development. Learning outcomes assessment approach is the basis for an objective study achievement assessment. In the result of the research are obtained assessments of future PE teacher's ability to develop lessons, choose their content, conduct them using holistic approach, critically analyze their performance and make decisions for the improvement of their qualification. Education leaders will use the obtained results in long-term program changes.

Author Biographies

  • Rasma Jansone, Latvian Academy of Sport Education

    Dr.paed., professor 

  • Andra Fernāte, Latvian Academy of Sport Education
    Dr.paed., associate prof.
  • Inta Immere, Latvian Academy of Sport Education

    Mg.paed., Assistant professor

References

Adam, S. (2004). Using learning outcomes: a consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for European education of employing “learning outcomes” at the local, national and international levels. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. http://www.ehea.info/Uploads/Seminars/040620LEARNING_OUTCOMES-Adams.pdf

Cartelli, A. (2006). Teaching in the Knowledge Society: New Skills And Instruments for Teachers. Information Science Pub

Education International (2011). Policy Paper on Education: Building the Future through Quality Education. Adopted by 6th World Congress, Cape Town, South Africa. http://pages.ei-ie.org/library/en/libraries/detail/157

Entwistle, N. (2005). Learning outcomes and ways of thinking across contrasting disciplines and settings in higher education. The Curriculum Journal, 16(1), 67–82.

European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2013). Physical Education and Sport at School in Europe Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/150EN.pdf

Nygaard, C., Højlt, T., & Hermansen, M. (2008). Learning-Based Curriculum Development. Higher Education, 55(1), 33–50.

Nygaard, C., Holtham, C., & Courtney, N. (2009). Learning Ourcomes – Politics, Religion or Improvement? In Nygaard et al. (Eds.), Improving Students’ Learning Outcomes. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.

Pušnik, M. and Zorman, M. (2004). Od znanja h kompetencam. Vzgoja in izobraževanje [From Knowledge to Competencies. Education], 3, 9-18.

Rauhvargers, A., Rusakova A. (2010). Improving recognition in the European Higher Education Area: an analysis of national action plans (Council of Europe higher education series No.12)

Downloads

Published

2015-07-24