THE IMPACT OF INTERACTIVE METHODS ON ONLINE DIDACTIC ACTIVITIES

Authors

  • Luiza Enachi-Vasluianu University of Bucharest, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences (RO)
  • Flavia Mălureanu University of Bucharest, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences (RO)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2022vol1.6860

Keywords:

eLearning, interactive methods, online learning

Abstract

The period of online didactic activities, caused by Sars-CoV-2 pandemic, offered teachers and students the opportunity to focus more on what is essential, on the elements with qualitative impact, on abilities and skills, rather than on content and peripheral elements (Botnariuc & Cucoș, 2020). From this perspective, the use of interactive methods in teaching and in solving cooperative learning assignments was one of the strategies used by teachers to maintain interest in learning, to strengthen the teaching process and to promote intellectual, verbal, social and emotional exchanges among students.

Our study focuses on the opinions of teachers from primary and lower secondary schools regarding the impact, the effectiveness of interactive methods in online didactic activities. The study involved focus group discussions and the selection of the most often used interactive methods (clustering technique, quadrants, conceptual maps, starbursting, brainstorming, quintet, think-pair-share, lotus blossom technique etc.) to be transposed into items in the questionnaire used in the research. The information gathered was interpreted using the SPSS analysis. The results of the study provide a data base and a possible framework to facilitate eLearning and a possible working strategy for primary and lower secondary school teachers to ensure students effective interactive learning experiences.

 

References

Bocoș, M.-D. (2013). Instruirea interactivă: repere axiologice și metodologice. Iași: Polirom.

Botnariuc, P., & Cucoș, C. (ed.). (2020). Școala online. Elemente pentru inovarea educației. Raport de cercetare evaluativă. București: Editura Universității din București.

Dulamă, M.E. (2008). Metodologii didactice activizante. Cluj-Napoca: Clusium.

Holcomb, E.L. (2001). Asking the Right Questions: Techniques for Collaboration and School Change. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Knapen, R. (2018). 20 Interactive Teaching Activities for the Interactive Classroom. Retrieved from https://www.bookwidgets.com/blog/2018/06/20-interactive-teaching-activities-for-in-the-interactive-classroom

Krantz, C. M., & Smith, L. G. (2021). Beyond Think-Pair-Share: A Quick Guide to Effective Collaboration. New York: Routledge.

Moise, C., & Seghedin, E. (2008). Metodele de învățământ. In Cucoș, C. (Ed.) Psihopedagogie pentru examenele de definitivare și grade didactice (305-353). Iași: Polirom.

Oprea, C.L. (2003). Pedagogie. Alternative metodologice interactive. București: Editura Universității din București.

Oprea, C.L. (2006). Strategii didactice interactive. Editura Didactică și Pedagogică, București.

Steele, J.L., Meredith, K.S., & Temple, C., (1998). Lectura şi scrierea pentru dezvoltarea gândirii critice, I. Bucureşti: Educaţia 2000+.

Taras, V., & Gonzalez-Perez, M. (2015). The Palgrave Handbook of Experiential Learning in International Business. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-19

How to Cite

Enachi-Vasluianu, L., & Mălureanu, F. (2022). THE IMPACT OF INTERACTIVE METHODS ON ONLINE DIDACTIC ACTIVITIES. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 351-358. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2022vol1.6860