PLANNING AND APPLICATION OF METHODS IN DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION AND INDIVIDUAL APPROACH TO PUPILS WITH DIFFICULTIES IN PRIMARY SCHOOL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol3.6238Keywords:
differentiation of instruction, individualised approach, methods, pupils with difficulties, teachersAbstract
In an inclusive school teachers are expected to take responsibility for planning the teaching process in which they will apply adequate support (Ahon Adaka, 2013; Tomlinson, 2015). The aim of this research is to determine certain specificities of teachers’ differentiated instruction in their teaching and planning of individualised methods for the successful conduction of activities with pupils with difficulties in lower and higher grades of primary school. The set hypothesis states that there is a statistically significant difference between class teachers and subject teachers of primary schools of the Republic of Croatia (N=410) in the estimation of their own planning and application of methods in differentiated instruction and individualised approach to pupils with difficulties. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to test the differences between teachers groups. The results showed that class teachers applied methods relating to pupils’ more successful inclusion in activities and supported their individuality by applying individualised teaching aids more than subject teachers. Such results indicate that differentiated and individualised teaching methods which are most adequate for a certain pupil and which will support their self-activity during primary education are still insufficiently present, even more in higher grades of primary school.
References
Ahon Adaka, T. (2013). Preparing Teachers for Inclusion: Models and Strategies. In M. Chitiyo, L. Aylward, E. Dalton, G. Prater, G. Chitiyo, A. Hughes (Eds.), The Bridge from Segregation to Inclusion. A Long Journey (9–10). Proceedings for the Thirteenth Biennial Conference of the International Association of Special Education Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Bondie, R.S., Dahnke, C., & Zusho, A. (2019). How Does Changing “One-Size-Fits-All” to Differentiated Instruction Affect Teaching? Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 336–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821130
Buli-Holmberg, J. (2008). Teachers role in Inclusive education. In H. Bjørnstud, & S. Nilsen, (Eds.), Adapted Education – intension and school development. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
Buli-Holmberg, J., & Jeyaprathaban, S. (2016). Effective practice in inclusive and special needs education. International journal of special education, 31(1), 119–134.
Conderman, G., & Johnston-Rodriguez, S. (2009). Beginning teachers’ views of their collaborative roles. Preventing School Failure, 53, 235-242.
Grimes, K.J., & Stevens, D.D. (2009). Glass, bug, mud. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 677–680.
Jenkins, J., Schiller, E., Blackorby, J., Thayer, S., & Tilly, W. (2013). Responsiveness to intervention in reading: Architecture and practices. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(1), 36–46.
Kudek Mirošević, J., & Bukvić, Z. (2017). Differences in the provision of individualised educational support to students in different grades. Hrvatska revija za rehabilitacijska istraživanja, 53 (Supplement), 265–277.
Obiakor, F.E., Harris, M., Mutua, K., Rotatori, A., & Algozzine, B. (2012). Making inclusion work in general education classrooms. Education and Treatment of Children, 35(3), 477–490.
Rock, M.L., Gregg, M., Ellis, E., & Gable, R. A. (2008). REACH: A framework for differentiating classroom instruction. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 31–47.
Schleicher, A. (2016). Teaching Excellence Through Professional Learning and Policy Reform: Lessons from Around the World. Paris: International Summit on the Teaching Profession; OECD Publishing.
Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & Marshak, L. (2012). Peer-mediated instruction in inclusive secondary social studies learning: Direct and indirect learning effects. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(1), 12–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00346.x
Smale-Jacobse, A.E., Meijer, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Differentiated Instruction in Secondary Education: A Systematic Review of Research Evidence. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366
Subban, P. (2006). Differentiated instruction: A research basis. International Education Journal, 7(7), 935–947.
Thousand, J.S., Villa, R.A., & Nevin, A.I. (2007). Differentiating instruction: Collaborative planning and teaching for universally designed learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Tomlinson, C.A. (2000). Differentiation of Instruction in the Elementary Grades. ERIC Digest. Washington, D.C.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education.
Tomlinson, C.A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.) Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tomlinson, C.A. (2004). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Tools and strategies for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tomlinson, C.A. (2015). Teaching for Excellence in Academically Diverse Classrooms. Society 52(3), 203–209.
Tomlinson, C.A., & Allan, S.D. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools & classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Van Casteren, W., Bendig-Jacobs, J., Wartenbergh-Cras, F., Van Essen, M., & Kurver, B. (2017). Differentiëren en Differentiatievaardigheden in Het Voortgezet Onderwijs. Nijmegen: Research Ned.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
