FEATURES OF COGNITIVE ACTIVENESS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS IN RUSSIA

Authors

  • Alexej Nikolaev Pskov State University (RU)
  • Irina Kolbasova Pskov State University (RU)
  • Natalia Shlat Pskov State University (RU)
  • Evgenia Suvorova Pskov State University (RU)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol2.5157

Keywords:

adaptability, cognitive activeness, correspondence of goals to results, motives for profes-sional activity, pedagogical abilities, satisfaction, stress resilience for the activity, success-fulness of the performance

Abstract

There has been a decrease of the activeness in the sphere of self-improvement among specialists. It can be assumed that this happens with university teachers as well, and the reason for this might be the fall of their cognitive activeness. The author of the article determines the particularity of the cognitive activeness, its most valuable indicators, as well as their psychological factors. The objective is to reveal the peculiarities of cognitive activeness for further scientific justification of the ways of its development. The questionnaire and the experiment methods were used, the cognitive activeness of the teachers was measured with the scale-type survey, worked out by J. J. Zhukov; the satisfaction with the performance was measured with the expert assessments survey, worked out by G. V. Lozovaja; the pedagogical abilities, the motives of professional activity, the successfulness of the performance and the adaptation to it were determined by the A. N. Nikolaev´s surveys. The main results are the following: the components of cognitive activeness dominate – the integration of educational material, supra-situational activity, the interest in cognition. The components of cognitive activeness have an impact on all indicators of teachers' adaptability. Three types of teachers have been identified: those motivated to the success of their activity; those motivated to the process itself; and those who are passionate about their activities. These types correspond to the results of the factor analysis with factors that are focused on the profession and self-improvement through cognitive activeness, on the activity preference based on one´s interests, and on the success of the activity according to one´s abilities.

 

References

Fromm, E. (1990). Imet ili dit? Мoskva: Progress.

Lozovaia, G.V. (2001). Metodika izucheniia udovletvorennosti professionalnoyu deiatelnostyu. Psihologicheskie osnovi pedagogicheskoi deiatelnosti, 2, 78−81

Nikolaev, A.N. (2005). Psihologiia trenera v detsko-yunosheskom sporte. Sankt-Peterburg: GAPPO.

Pevzner, А.Е. (1996). Psihologicheskie faktori effektivnosti stereotipnoi i variatipnoi strategi povedenia: Diss. … kand. psihol. nauk. Sankt-Peterburg.

Priazhnikov, N.S. (2001). Аktivnie metodi professionalnogo samoopredeleniia: Utshebnoe posobie. Мoskva: МGPPI.

Priazhnikov, N.S. (2008). Prjfessionalvoe samoopredelenie: teoriia i praktika. Мoskva: Akademiia.

Shalova, S. Ju. (2012). Vliianie nautshno-issledovatekskoi deiatelnosti na razvitie poznavatelnoi aktivnosti studentov. Retrieved from https://www.sworld.com.ua/index.php/ru/pedagogy-psychology-and-sociology-312/theory-and-methods-of-studying-education-and-training-312/13865-312-115

Shlat, N., Borisov, B., Eyliseyeva, N., & Shakirova, N. (2019). Conditions of formation of creative activity of students by means of information – communication technologies. Society, Integration, Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol5.3762

Zhukov, Yu. (2013). Poznavatelnaia aktivnost kak factor uspevaemosti studentov vuzov fizicheskoi kulturi. Uchenie zapiski universiteta imeni P.F. Lesgafta, 9(103), 44−50.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-20

How to Cite

Nikolaev, A., Kolbasova, I., Shlat, N., & Suvorova, E. (2020). FEATURES OF COGNITIVE ACTIVENESS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHERS IN RUSSIA. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 2, 130-140. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol2.5157