FEATURES OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING OF STUDENT YOUTH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol7.5142Keywords:
factors of psychological well-being, psychological well-being, social approval, subjective social well-beingAbstract
The purpose of the article is to study the characteristics and factors of students’ psychological well-being. The basic approaches to psychological well-being studies are considered. The study was based on C. Ryff’s model, according to which psychological well-being is a complex, integral phenomenon that characterizes an individual’s positive functioning and is expressed in the subjective experience of life satisfaction, realization of one’s own potential and depends on the subjective quality of an individual’s communication with others. The empirical research tools used in the study are: Ryff's Six-factor Model of Psychological Well-being and the Questionnaire of Subjective Social Well-Being (T. V. Danylchenko). The main characteristics of modern students’ psychological profile are: independence, self-sufficiency, clearly set goals and understood ways of their implementation, a large number of trusting relationships with other people and a moderate level of control over life situations.The article shows that students’ psychological well-being is associated with their subjective social well-being: personal achievements alone do not make students feel psychologically well without their positive assessment from the side of their social environment. Based on the factor analysis results, students’ psychological well-being factors depending on their gender are identified. Boy’s psychological well-being factors are: self-sufficiency, social approval and social activity; those of girls are: self-improvement / self-realization, social noticeability (publicity), social proximity.References
Alesina, A, Di Tella, R, & MacCulloch, R. (2004). Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different? Journal of Public Economics, 88(9-10), 2009-2042. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.07.006
Batz, C., & Tay, L. (2018). Gender differences in subjective well-being. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321058044_Gender_Differences_in_Subjective_Well-Being
Berry, J.W., & Sabatier, C. (2011). Variations in the assessment of acculturation attitudes: Their relationships with psychological wellbeing. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(5), 658-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.02.002
Burris, J.L., Brechting, E.H., Salsman, J., & Carlson, C.R. (2009). Factors associated with the psychological well-being and distress of university students. Journal Of American College Health, 57(5), 536-544. https://doi.org/10.3200/JACH.57.5.536-544
Danylchenko, T.V. (2018). Psyxolohiya sub’yektyvnoho social"noho blahopoluchchya: dis. … d-ra psyxol. n. : spec: 19.00.05 «social"na psyxolohiya; psyxolohiya social"noyi roboty». Kyiv. Retrieved from
http://scc.univ.kiev.ua/upload/iblock/e13/dis_Danilchenko%20T.%20V..pdf
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. DOI: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Diener, E. (2009). The science of well-being: the collected works. Social Indicators Research Series, 37, 274. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6
Diener, E., & Suh, M.E. (1997). Subjective Well-being and Age: An International Analysis. In K. Warner Schaie (Eds.) Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Volume 17: Focus on Emotion and Adult Development, Springer Publishing Company, 384. Retrieved from https://goo-gl.su/EmjrKjX
Eagly, A.H., & Karau, S.J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, Vol. 109(3), 573-598. Retrieved from http://web.pdx.edu/~mev/pdf/Eagley_Karau.pdf
Howell, R.T., Kern, M.L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). Health benefits: Meta-analytically determining the impact of well-being on objective health outcomes. Health Psychology Review, 1, 83-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17437190701492486
Huppert, F.A., Baylis, N., & Keverne, B. (Eds.) (2005). The science of well‐being. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://goo-gl.su/BFUb
Huppert, F.A. (2014). The state of wellbeing science:Concepts, measures, interventions, and policies. In F. A.Huppert & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Wellbeing: A completereference guide: Interventions and policies to enhance well-being. Vol. IV. (pp. 1–50). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Retrieved from
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7c8f/38ebb05092104f1e224b33ed41c07db74216.pdf
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, values and frames. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814417358_0016
Linley, P.A., Maltby, J., Wood, A.M., Osborne, G., & Hurling, R. (2009). Measuring happiness: The higher order factor structure of subjective and psychological well-being measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 878-884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.010
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L. A., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803-855. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
Magnus, K., & Diener E. (1991). A longitudinal analysis of personality, life events, and subjective well-being, Paper presented at the Sixty-third Annual Meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association (May 2–4), Chicago. Retrieved from http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_bib/freetexts/magnus_k_1991.pdf
Margaret, L. Kern, Lea, E. Waters, A.A., & Mathew A. White (2015). A multidimensional approach to measuring well-being in students: Applicationof the PERMA framework. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(3), 262-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.936962
Meisenberg, G., & Woodley of Menie, M. (2015). Gender Differences in Subjective Well-Being and Their Relationships with Gender Equality. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 1539-1555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9577-5
Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2014). Residents of Poor Nations Have a Greater Sense of Meaning in Life Than Residents of Wealthy Nations. Psychological Science, 25(2), 422-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613507286
Peterson, C. (2006). A primer in positive psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.2304/plat.2007.6.2.160
Phinney, J.S., Horenczyk, G., Liebkind, K., & Vedder, P. (2001). Ethnic Identity, Immigration, and Well‐Being: An Interactional Perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 493-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00225
Ridner, S., Newton, K., Staten, R., Crawford, T., & Hall, L. (2015). Predictors of well-being among college students. Journal of American College Health, 64, 2, 116-124. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2015.1085057
Røysamb, E., Harris, J.R., Magnus, P., Vittersø, J., & Tambs, K. (2002). Subjective well-being: Sex-specific effects of genetic and environmental factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(2), 211-223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00019-8
Ruini, C., Ottolini, F., Rafanelli, C., Tossani, E., Ryff, C.D., & Fava, G.A. (2003). The relationship of psychological well-being to distress and personality. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 72(5), 268-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000071898
Ruth, M.S.L., & Napier, J. (2014). Gender Inequality and Subjective Well-Being. In: Michalos A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5
Ryff, C.D. (1995). Psychological Well-Being in Adult Life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 99-104. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772395
Salami, S. (2010). Emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, psychological well-being and students attitudes: Implications for quality education. European Journal of Educational Studies, 2, 247-257. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266419723
Serdiuk, L. (2011). Psychological well-being of future specialists in the integrated educational environment and the factors of its formation. Social welfare. Interdisciplinary approach, 1(1), 44-51. Retrieved from http://socialwelfare.eu/index.php/sw/article/view/178/135
Sujoldzić, A., & Lucia, A. (2007). A cross-cultural study of adolescents--BMI, body image and psychological well-being. Collegium antropologicum, 31, 123-30. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6239941_A_cross-cultural_study_of_adolescents--BMI_body_image_and_psychological_well-being
Taylor, S.E.(2011). Social support: A review. In H.S. Friedman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of health psychology (pp. 189–214). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195342819.013.0009
Tesch-Römer, C., Motel-Klingebiel, A., & Tomasik, M. J. (2008). Gender differences in subjective well-being: Comparing societies with respect to gender equality. Social Indicators Research, 85(2), 329-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9133-3
Waters, L. (2014). Balancing the curriculum: Teaching gratitude, hope and resilience. In H. Sykes (Ed.), A love of Ideas (pp. 117–124). Albert Park: Future Leaders Press. Retrieved from https://www.strengthswitch.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Waters-2014-balancing-the-curriculum-teaching-hope-gratitude-and-resilience.pdf
World Health Organisation (2001). The world health report—Mental health: New understanding, new hope. Geneva: World Health Organisation. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42390
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
