DIFFERENCES OF THE LATVIAN POPULATION PERCEPTIONS AND MEMORIES OF THE DAILY ACTIVITIES OVER 30 YEARS

Authors

  • Zane Ulmane Riga Stradiņš University
  • Kristīne Šneidere Riga Stradiņš University
  • Gatis Upesleja Riga Stradiņš University,The Military Medicine Research and Study Centre
  • Ainārs Stepens Riga Stradiņš University, The Military Medicine Research and Study Centre, Rietumu Clinic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol6.5122

Keywords:

life-time, physical activity, primary data, tertiary data

Abstract

Regular physical activity helps to improve physical and mental functions as well as reverse some effects of chronic disease to keep older people mobile and independent (McPhee et al., 2016). However, physical activity with aerobic load elements could be a contributing factor to aging (Prakash, Voss, Erickson, & Kramer, 2015). Epidemiological studies have shown that the intensity of daily physical activity might have an important role to maintain life-long cognition (Kimura, Yasunaga, & Wang, 2013). The aim is to identify differences Latvian time use from the retrospective surveying primary data from Total Life-span Physical Activity questionnaire and tertiary data from 1979 published data on population time use and trends (Eglite, Svikis, & Zarina, 1979). Methods: The primary data of daily activities was from April to December 2019 obtained from the retrospective questionnaire “Total Lifespan Physical Activity questionnaire” (Ulmane, Šneidere, & Stepens, 2019) and tertiary data were used from 1979 published data on population time use and trends (Eglite, Svikis, & Zarina, 1979). The data were adjusted to six physical activity categories to be comparable - Work/education, physiological needs, Transportation, Leisure time, Household activities and Sports. Results: did not affect males and females differently in these measures, but only differences of some categories. Results show that the most differences were found in the categories – transportation, household activities, and sport. Conclusions: The study had several limitations because data from the 1979 published book (Eglite, Svikis, & Zarina, 1979) was only available in aggregate form. Together these results provide important insights into the difference between the capital city, small towns or rural areas, but 2019 study respondents were almost always from the capital city. However, in the future for more precise data analysis needed primary or secondary data.

 

References

Allender, S., Foster, C., & Boxer, A. (2008). Occupational and Nonoccupational Physical Activity and the Social Determinants of Physical Activity: Results From the Health Survey for England. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 5(1), 104–116.

Boulton, E.R., Horne, M., & Todd, C. (2018). Multiple influences on participating in physical activity in older age: Developing a social ecological approach. Health Expectations, 21(1), 239-248.

Bruderer-Hofstetter, M., Rausch-Osthoff, A.-K., Meichtry, A., Münzer, T., & Niedermann, K. (2018). Effective multicomponent interventions in comparison to active control and no interventions on physical capacity, cognitive function and instrumental activities of daily living in elderly people with and without mild impaired cognition – A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews, 45, 1–14.

Burke, V., Beilin, L. J., Dunbar, D., & Kevan, M. (2004). Changes in health-related behaviours and cardiovascular risk factors in young adults: associations with living with a partner. Preventive medicine, 39(4), 722-730.

De Lira, C.A.B., Taveira, H.V., Rufo-Tavares, W., Amorim, A. dos S., Ferreira, L.M.C., Andrade, M.S., & Vancini, R.L. (2018). Engagement in a Community Physical Activity Program and Its Effects Upon the Health-Related Quality of Life of Elderly People: A Cross-Sectional Study. Value in Health Regional Issues, 17, 183–188.

Dumith, S.C., Hallal, P.C., Reis, R.S., & Kohl, H.W. (2011). Worldwide prevalence of physical inactivity and its association with human development index in 76 countries. Preventive Medicine, 53(1-2), 24–28.

Drizulis, A. (1980). Rīga sociālisma laikmetā. Izdevniecība “Zinātne”.

Eglite, P., Svikis, A., & Zarina, I. (1979). Iedzīvotāju laiks. Izdevniecība “Liesma”.

Hamer, M., Kivimaki, M., & Steptoe, A. (2012). Longitudinal patterns in physical activity and sedentary behaviour from mid-life to early old age: a substudy of the Whitehall II cohort. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 66(12), 1110–1115.

Garcia, A., Pender N., Antonakos, C., & Ronis, D. (1998). Changes in Physical Activity Beliefs and Behaviors of Boys and Girls Across the Transition to Junior High School. Journal of Adolescent Health, 22(5), 394–402.

Kramer, A.F., Erickson, K.I., & Colcombe, S.J. (2006). Exercise, cognition, and the aging brain. Journal of applied physiology, 101(4), 1237-1242.

Kimura, K., Yasunaga, A., & Wang, L.-Q. (2013). Correlation between moderate daily physical activity and neurocognitive variability in healthy elderly people. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 56(1), 109–117.

Langhammer, B., Bergland, A., Rydwik, E. (2018). The Importance of Physical Activity Exercise among Older People. BioMed Research International Volume 2018, Article ID 7856823, 3 pages.

Manini, T.M., & Pahor, M. (2009). Physical activity and maintaining physical function in older adults. British journal of sports medicine, 43(1), 28-31.

McIntyre, C.A., & Rhodes, R.E. (2009). Correlates of leisure-time physical activity during transitions to motherhood. Women & health, 49(1), 66-83.

McPhee, J.S., French, D.P., Jackson, D., Nazroo, J., Pendleton, N., & Degens, H. (2016). Physical activity in older age: perspectives for healthy ageing and frailty. Biogerontology, 17(3), 567–580.

Muchiri, W.A., Olutende, O.M., Kweyu, I.W., & Vurigwa, E. (2018). Meaning of Physical Activities for the Elderly: A Review. American Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 6(3), 79-83.

Pavlovičs, J. (2012). Padomju Latvijas ikdiena. Apgāds “Jumava”.

Prakash, R.S., Voss, M.W., Erickson, K.I., & Kramer, A.F. (2015). Physical Activity and Cognitive Vitality. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 769–797.

Puggina, A., Aleksovska, K., Buck, C., Burns, C., Cardon, G., Carlin, A. (2017). Policy determinants of physical activity across the life course: a “DEDIPAC” umbrella systematic literature review. European Journal of Public Health, 28(1), 105–118.

Raymore, L.A., Barber, B.L., & Eccles, J.S. (2001). J. Leaving home, attending college, partnership and parenthood: the role of life transition events in leisure pattern stability from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30(2), 197–223.

Stessman, J. (2009). Physical Activity, Function, and Longevity Among the Very Old. Archives of Internal Medicine, 169(16), 1476.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-20