• Dace Stiegele Liepaja University
  • Mirdza Paipare Liepaja University



lifelong learning, life satisfaction, quality of life, social interaction, subjective well-being


In recent decades, quality of life issues and research have been increasingly focused on seeing a direct link between indicators of subjective well-being and economic growth. In Latvia, the issue of subjective well-being has also been raised in recent years in population surveys, but there are no trends in emphasizing the importance of these indicators in the context of quality of life.

In Latvia, education is included in the statistical data collection among the most important quality of life indicators. In Latvia, the level of life satisfaction decreases most rapidly at the age of 45-54.

Purpose of the article: to research the components of quality of life in Europe and Latvia, identify significant indicators for the mantaining of adult quality of life and view on education and subjective well-being in the context of assessment of quality of adults life.

Method: the study carried out an content analysis of the data of Eurostat population quality of life surveys, the EU and the Republic of Latvia's official guidelines on quality of life and lifelong learning, as well as pedagogical and psychological literature and scientific articles on quality of life, subjective well-being and adult education issues.

Results: according to survey data, adults with higher level of education experience higher level of participation in lifelong learning activities; the level of education affects the assessment of life satisfaction.



Author Biographies

  • Dace Stiegele, Liepaja University
    Music therapist, PhD first year student
  • Mirdza Paipare, Liepaja University
    Course Director, Liepaja University


Bowling, A. (2004). A Taxonomy and Overview of Quality of Life. In Brown, J., Bowling, A., Flynn, T. (Ed.) Models of Quality of Life: A Taxomony, Overview and Systematic Review of the Literature. (pp. 6–77). European Forum on Population Ageing Research. Retrieved from

Centrālās statistikas pārvalde. (n.d.). Dzīves kvalitāte. Retrieved from

Centrālās statistikas pārvalde. (2019). Pērn ar savu dzīvi. Piejams: Retrieved from

Eurofound. (2019). Dzīves kvalitāte un publiskie pakalpojumi. Retrieved from

Eurofound. (2019a). Subjective well–being. Retrieved from

Eurostat. (2019). About one third. Retrieved from

Eurostat. (2019a). Education in the context of quality of life. Retrieved from

Eurostat. (2019b). Life satisfaction by income and age groups. Retrieved from

Eurostat. (2019c). Life satisfaction in Europe. Retrieved from

Eurostat. (2019d). Overall life satisfaction in the context of quality of life. Retrieved from

Eurostat. (2019e). Quality of life indicators. Retrieved from

Eurostat. (2019f). Quality of life indicators – education. Retrieved from

Eurostat. (2018). Quality of life indicators – leisure and social interactions. Retrieved from

Eurostat. (2019g). Quality of life indicators - overall experience of life. Retrieved from

Eurostat. (2018a). Social interactions. Retrieved from

Eurostat. (2019h). 10.9 % of those aged 25–64. Retrieved from

Ivanova, I. (2016). Pieaugušo mācīšanās īpatnības. Retrieved from

Lieģeniece, D. (2002). Ievads andragoģijā jeb mācīšanās “būt” pieaugušo vecumā. Rīga: Raka.

Proctor, C.L. (2014). Subjective well-being. From book Greydanus, D. E., Pratt, H. D. & Patel, D. R. (2013). Health Promotion: Adolescent Well Being. In: Michalos, A. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. (pp 2735-2743). Netherlands: Springer. Retrieved from

Svence, G., & Majors, M. (2016). Labizjūtas saistība ar dzīvesspēku un vecumu pieaugušo izlasēs. Latvijas Universitātes raksti, 810, 57-69.