THE STATE POLICY OF UKRAINE IN THE FIELD OF CONTINUOUS ECONOMIC EDUCATION

Authors

  • Oleksandr Bezliudnyi Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University (UA)
  • Oleksandr Kirdan Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University (UA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol6.4965

Keywords:

continuing education, economic education, educational levels, informal education, formal education, non-formal education, public education policy

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to substantiate the main components and factors of the state policy of Ukraine that influence the development of continuous economic education and to outline ways of its improvement. Achieving the aim of the research study made it possible to use the following methods: comparative and structural-logical analysis, classification, systematization, generalization. Results of the research. The essence of continuous economic education, its role and importance at national and world levels are considered. On the basis of a structural-logical analysis and systematization, the current normative-legal acts of Ukraine are grouped into the following groups: strategic guidelines for the development of continuous economic education; documents regulating the content of continuing economic education; regulatory and legal regulation of state supervision measures in the field of education and quality assurance. The main components of the state policy of Ukraine that influence the development of continuous economic education are defined, namely: development of the system of continuous economic education throughout life; creation of equal opportunities for formal, informal and non-formal economic education for all citizens of Ukraine; formation of values and social economic responsibility; a policy of enhancing the culture of teaching, learning and assessment. The dynamics of applicants for higher economic education of bachelor's and master's degrees are analysed.

 

 

References

https://www.csb.gov.lv/lv/statistika/db

Bērziņš, A. (2019). Iedzīvotāju sastāva novecošana. Krūmiņš, J., Krišjāne, Z. (zin.red.) Tautas ataudze Latvijā un sabiedrības atjaunošanas izaicinājumi. LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, Rīga.

Booth, H. (2006). Demographic forecasting: 1980 to 2005 in review. International journal of forecasting, 22(3), 547-581.

Eglīte, P., Ivbulis, B., & Gņedovska I. (2012) Demogrāfiskās prognozes Rīgā un Pierīgā. Retrieved from: http://www.sus.lv/sites/default/files/media/faili/demografiskas_prognozes_riga_un_pieriga_rd_lza_2012.pdf

Fihel, A., & Okólski, M. (2019). Demographic change and challenge. In Gorzelak, G. (Ed.). Social and Economic Development in Central and Eastern Europe: Stability and Change after 1990. Routledge, London and New York, 124-158.

Kabisch, N., & Haase, D. (2011). Diversifying European agglomerations: evidence of urban population trends for the 21st century. Population, space and place, 17 (3), 236-253.

Krūmiņš, J., & Krišjāne, Z. (2016). Demogrāfiskā attīstība Latvijā: problēmas un izaicinājumi. Latvijas Zinātņu Akadēmijas Vēstis "A" daļa, 70 (3), 40-50.

Krūmiņš, J., & Bērziņš, A. (2019). Demogrāfiskās attīstības vērtējumi un prognozes. Krūmiņš, J., Krišjāne, Z. (zin.red.) Tautas ataudze Latvijā un sabiedrības atjaunošanas izaicinājumi. LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, Rīga.

Krumins, Juris, et al. (2017). Demographic implications of the recent regional and cohesion policy developments in Latvia. New Challenges of Economic and Business Development–2017 Digital Economy, 288.

Langford, M., Higgs, G., & Dallimore, D. J. (2019). Investigating spatial variations in access to childcare provision using network‐based Geographic Information System models. Social Policy & Administration, 53 (5), 661-677.

Mayaud, J. R., Tran, M., Pereira, R. H., & Nuttall, R. (2019). Future access to essential services in a growing smart city: The case of Surrey, British Columbia. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 73, 1-15.

Rīgas domes Izglītības, kultūras un sporta departaments (RD IKSD), 2020. Iestāžu katalogs. Retrieved from: http://katalogs-iksd.riga.lv/lv/sakums

Rīgas domes Pilsētas attīstības departaments (RDPAD) 2020, projekts “Rīgas apkaimes”. Retrieved from: https://apkaimes.lv/

Rivza, B., & Jermolajeva, E. (2018). Beyond a century. The smart Latvia. The national research programme EKOSOC-LV “Economic transformation, smart growth, governance and legal framework for the state and society for sustainable development-a new approach to the creation of a sustainable learning community”. Riga, Latvian Academy of Sciences, 416.

Terama, E., Clarke, E., Rounsevell, M. D., Fronzek, S., & Carter, T. R. (2019). Modelling population structure in the context of urban land use change in Europe. Regional environmental change, 19 (3), 667-677.

Vihalemm, P., Masso, A. & Opermann, S. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge International Handbook of European Social Transformations. Routledge.

Weishaupt, H. (2016). How Demographic Change Affects Education? HERJ Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 6(3), 84-94.

Wilson, T. & Rees, P. (2005). Recent developments in population projection methodology: A review. Population, Space and Place, 11 (5), 337-360.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-20

How to Cite

Bezliudnyi, O., & Kirdan, O. (2020). THE STATE POLICY OF UKRAINE IN THE FIELD OF CONTINUOUS ECONOMIC EDUCATION. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 6, 521-531. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol6.4965