• Dzintra Kazoka Rīga Stradiņš University, Institute of Anatomy and Anthropology (LV)
  • Mara Pilmane Rīga Stradiņš University, Institute of Anatomy and Anthropology (LV)




anatomy, performances, roles, teaching, tutor, virtual technology


Dynamical development of technologies changes not only education system in medicine at Rīga Stradiņš University, but there are a lot of performances in roles of the tutors, their skills and knowledge. The aim of this study was to investigate how the use of the 3D virtual dissection table “Anatomage”, like a platform for teaching of the students, transforms the tutors roles. In years 2016-2019 ten tutors learned the virtual technology well enough to utilize it in the practical classes and to integrate new, modern content into Human Anatomy curriculum at Department of Morphology. Tutors used virtual dissection platform and tools for a variety of purposes and in many ways. New technology helped tutors to develop topics with more interactive, complex tasks and collaboration among students, promoted required assessment methods and student self-assessment. Based on the variety of roles played by the Human Anatomy tutor in this virtual experience, through the focus groups we were fixed four main tutors roles types (technical, pedagogical, social and leadering). Variations in the usage of the “Anatomage” offered and reflected important performances, differences and divergences in tutors and their`s beliefs about the utility of this technology in the study course.


Download data is not yet available.


Ang, E. T., Chan, J. M., Gopal, V., & Li Shia, N. (2018). Gamifying anatomy education. Clinical Anatomy, 31, 997-1005. DOI: 10.1002/ca.23249.

Arantes, M., Arantes, J., & Ferreira, M. A. (2018). Tools and resources for neuroanatomy education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 18, 94. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1210-6

Attardi, S. M., Barbeau, M. L., & Rogers, K. A. (2018). Improving Online Interactions: Lessons from an Online Anatomy Course with a Laboratory for Undergraduate Students. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11, 592-604. DOI :10.1002/ase.1776.

Bernardo, A. (2017). Virtual Reality and Simulation in Neurosurgical Training. World Neurosurgery, 106, 1015-1029. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.140.

Brucoli, M., Boccafoschi, F., Boffano, P., Broccardo, E., & Benech, A. (2018). The Anatomage Table and the placement of titanium mesh for the management of orbital floor fractures. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 126, 317-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.04.006

Doubleday, A. F. & Lee, L. M. (2016). Dissecting the voice: Health professions students' perceptions of instructor age and gender in an online environment and the impact on evaluations for faculty. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9, 537-544. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1609

El Bialy, S. & Jalali, A. (2015). Go Where the Students Are: A Comparison of the Use of Social Networking Sites Between Medical Students and Medical Educators. JMIR Medical Education, 1, e7. DOI: 10.2196/mededu.4908

Erolin, C. (2019). Interactive 3D Digital Models for Anatomy and Medical Education. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 1138, 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14227-8_1

Erolin, C., Reid, L., & McDougall, S. (2019). Using virtual reality to complement and enhance anatomy education. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 42, 93-101. DOI: 10.1080/17453054.2019.1597626.

Guimarães, B., Dourado, L., Tsisar, S., Diniz, J. M., Madeira, M. D., & Ferreira, M. A. (2017). Rethinking Anatomy: How to Overcome Challenges of Medical Education's Evolution. Acta Médica Portuguesa, 30, 134-140. DOI: 10.20344/amp.8404

Helle, L., Nivala, M., & Kronqvist, P. (2013). More technology, better learning resources, better learning? Lessons from adopting virtual microscopy in undergraduate medical education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 6, 73-80. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1302

Juneja, S. & Juneja, M. (2017). Virtual digital pathology: The future is near. Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology, 60, 306-307. DOI: 10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_324_16

McCarty, J.L., Gołofit, P., Tigges, S., & Skalski, M. (2018). Digital Medical Illustration for the Radiologist. Radiographics, 38, 1145-1157. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170088

Meedya, S., Moroney, T., Nielsen, W., & Najafi Bokat, I. (2019). Digital explanations and nursing students' perception of learning science. Nurse Education in Practice, 41, 102636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.102636

Oh, C.S., Kim, K. ., Chung, E., & Choi, H. . (2015). Digital report in an anatomy laboratory: a new method for team-based dissection, reporting, and evaluation. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 37, 293-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1353-z

Peterson, D.C. & Mlynarczyk, G.. (2016). Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9, 529-536. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1612

Pickering, J.D. & Roberts, D.J.H. (2018). Flipped classroom or an active lecture? Clinical Anatomy, 31, 118-121. DOI: 10.1002/ca.22983.

Pyörälä, E., Mäenpää, S., Heinonen, L., Folger, D., Masalin, T.. & Hervonen, H. (2019). The art of note taking with mobile devices in medical education. BMC Medical Education, 19, 96. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1529-7

Singh, A. & Min, A.K. (2017). Digital lectures for learning gross anatomy: a study of their efficacy. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 29, 27-32. DOI: 10.3946/kjme.2017.50

Stepan, K., Zeiger, J., Hanchuk, S., Del Signore, A., Shrivastava, R., Govindaraj, S., & Iloreta, A. (2017). Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy. Internal Forum of Allergy and Rhinology, 7, 1006-1013. DOI: 10.1002/alr.21986

Sweet, R.M. (2017). The CREST Simulation Development Process: Training the Next Generation. Journal of Endourology, 31, S69-S75. DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0613

Taylor, M., Yates, A., Meyer, L.H., & Kinsella, P. (2011). Teacher professional leadership in support of teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 85-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.07.005

Trelease, R.B. (2016). From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e-learning: How computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9, 583-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1620

Wilson, A.B., Miller, C. H., Klein, B.A., Taylor, M.A., Goodwin, M., Boyle, E. K., Brown, K., Hoppe, C., & Lazarus, M. (2018). A meta-analysis of anatomy laboratory pedagogies. Clinical Anatomy, 31, 122-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22934

Wu, Y., Hikspoors, J.P.J.M., Mommen, G., Dabhoiwala, N.F., Hu, X., Tan, L.W., Zhang, S.X., & Lamers, W. H. (2019). Interactive three-dimensional teaching models of the female and male pelvic floor. Clinical Anatomy, Oct, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23508

Zilverschoon, M., Vincken, K.L. & Bleys, R.L. (2017). The virtual dissecting room: Creating highly detailed anatomy models for educational purposes. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 65, 58-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.11.005




How to Cite

Kazoka, D., & Pilmane, M. (2020). TUTOR`S ROLES AND PERFORMANCES IN MODERN HUMAN ANATOMY COURSE SUPPORTED BY VIRTUAL TECHNOLOGY. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 341-349. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol1.4954