Representations and Meanings of Adult Education Staff Evaluation. A Pedagogical Reflection on Six Case Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2015vol4.495Keywords:
Adult Education, Evaluation, Evaluation of Adult Education Staff, Evaluation Meanings, Individual Learning, Organizational Learning, Learning through ExperienceAbstract
This paper deals with six case studies of evaluation, which were discussed at the Mobility Workshop organized in the context of the EduEval Project (Evaluation for the Professional Development of Adult Education Staff, LLP Grundtvig).This paper depicts the different representations of evaluation explicitly and implicitly present. The aim of the article is twofold. First, it explores the meanings associated with the evaluation practicesdescribed, and it identifies both transversal and specific components. Second, it critically reflects on how evaluation may sustain and/or develop the competences of Adult Education Staff,in the light of the current pedagogical debate on the theme.
Downloads
References
Amietta, F. (2002), Valutare i processi formativi: il valore aggiunto per l’organizzazione. In Bisio C. (2002) (Ed), Valutare in formazione. Azioni, significati, valori (pp. 174-186). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Beeby, C. E. (1977). The meaning of evaluation, Current issues in education, 6, 66-78.
Bellotto, M. (2002). Valutare la dinamica del gruppo di formazione. In Bisio, C. (Ed), Valutare in formazione. Azioni, significati, valori (pp. 129-150). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Bertolini, P. (1999), La valutazione possibile. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
Bezzi, C. (2007). Che cos’è la valutazione. Un’introduzione ai concetti, le parole chiave e i problemi metodologici. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Bisio C. (2002) (Ed), Valutare in formazione. Azioni, significati, valori. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Boud, D. et al. (2000) (Eds), Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. New York: Nichols Publishing Company.
CEU (2000), Memorandum sull’istruzione e la formazione permanente. Retrieved from http://archivio.pubblica.istruzione.it/dg_postsecondaria/memorandum.pdf
CEU (2008). Council conclusions of 22 May 2008 on adult learning. Official Journal of the European Union, 6.6.2008, C 140/10 – C 140/13.
CEU (2011). Council Resolution on a renewed European agenda for adult learning. Official Journal of the European Union, 20.12.2011, C 372/1 – C 372/6.
Ciucci, F. (2008). Valutazione delle politiche e dei servizi sociali. Partecipazione, metodo, qualità. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005) (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.
Ferrario, P. (2013). Politiche dei servizi sociali. Strutture, trasformazioni, legislazione. Roma: Carocci.
Foucault, M. (1975), Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (2003), Le pouvoir psychiatrique. Cours au Collège de France 1973-1974. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1969). L’archéologie du savoir, Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1971). L’ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.
Gheno, S. (2002). Valutare l’empowerment nella formazione. In Bisio C. (2002) (Ed), Valutare in formazione. Azioni, significati, valor (56-77). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1985), Naturalistic Enquiry, Newbury Park, California; Sage Publication.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989), Fourth Generation Evaluation, Newbury Park, California: Sage Publication.
Hadji, C. (1992), L’évaluation des actions educatives, Paris: Press Universitaires de France.
Lichtner, M. (1999), La qualità delle azioni formative. Criteri di valutazione tra esigenze di funzionalità e costruzione del significato. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Mortari, L. (2003). Apprendere dall’esperienza. Il pensare riflessivo nella formazione, Roma: Carocci.
Mortari, L. (2007), Cultura della ricerca e pedagogia. Prospettive epistemologiche. Roma: Carocci.
Moss, P. (2005), Theoretical examination of quality. Early Education & Development, 4, 405-420.
Pandolfi, L. (2012), Valutare servizi educativi. Un’introduzione. Bari: Pensa Multimedia.
PANTEIA (2013). Developing the adult learning sector: Quality in the adult learning sector. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/library/study/2013/adult-quality_en.pdf
Reggio, P. (2002), La valutazione qualitativa nella formazione. In Bisio C. (Ed), Valutare in formazione. Azioni, significati, valori (pp. 220-246). Milano: FrancoAngeli
Research voor Beleid (2010). Key competences for adult learning professionals: Contribution to the development of a reference framework of key competences for adult learning professionals. Project number B3542. Zoetermeer: Research voor Beleid.
Rezzara, A. (2000), Pensare la valutazione. Pratiche valutative scolastiche e riflessione pedagogica. Mursia, Milano.
Righetti, E. (2002). La valutazione riflessiva: autovalutazione e apprendimento. In Bisio C. (2002) (Ed), Valutare in formazione. Azioni, significati, valori (78-93). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Rossi P. H., Lipsey M. W. & Frieman H. E. (2004), Evaluation: a Sistematic Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
Savignat P. (2009), Évaluer les établissements et les services socieaux et medico-socieaux. Des savoir-faire à reconnaître. Paris: Dunod.
Schön, D. A. (1991), The Reflective Practitioner. London: Temple Smith [1983].
Shaw I. F. & Lishman J. (1999), Evaluation and Social Work Practices, London: Sage Publication.
Striano, M. (2010), L’inclusione come progetto di sviluppo sociale nello scenario europeo. In Striano, M. (Ed), Pratiche educative per l’inclusione sociale (pp. 9-29), Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Vestman, O. K. & Conner, R. F. (2006). The relationship between evaluation and politics, in Shaw I. F. et al. (2006). The Sage Handbook of evaluation: politics, programs and practices (pp. 225-241), London, CA: Sage Publication.
Wolf, R. M. (1987), The nature of educational evaluation, in Wolf, R. M. (Ed.), Educational evaluation: the state of the field, international journal of educational research, 11 (1), 7-20.
www.edueval.eu
