USE OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN CHILDREN'S SPEECH AND LANGUAGE CORRECTION WORK IN PRESCHOOL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol4.4907Keywords:
corrective means, digital technologies, language correctionAbstract
In today's society, a child lives in a technology environment since birth, and it changes children's perception and learning habits, determining the necessity to use digital technologies that are interesting for preschool children, motivates them to perform speech and language corrective actions consciously, and enables the development of self-control of speech.
The objective of the paper is to stimulate discussion on the possibilities of using digital technologies in the correction of children's speech and language in preschool, based on the analysis of theoretical literature and the availability of means used in speech therapy correction.
Methods - literature analysis, survey of practicing speech therapists.
The results suggest that choice of means is determined by speech therapists' personal attitude toward digital technologies, which is influenced by respondents' experience and availability of technologies within the educational institution.
References
Alexander, R. (2008). Towards Dialogic Teaching: rethinking classroom talk (4th Edition). York: Dialogos.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The “digitalnatives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British journal of educational technology, 39(5), 775-786. Retrieved from: https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2465&context=edupapers
Bowman, B., Donovan, M.S. & Burns, M.S. (Eds.) (2000). Eager to Learn: Educating Our Preschoolers (Washington DC, National Academy Press). Retrieved from www.nap.edu/books/0309068363/html/
Bremer, J. (2005). The internet and children: advantages and disadvantages. Child & Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North Ammerica, 14, 405-428. DOI: 10.1016/j.chc.2005.02.003
Ching, D., Shuler, C., Lewis, A., & Levine, M. (2009). Harnessing the potential of mobile technologies for children and learning. Mobile technology for children: designing for interaction and learning,. 23-42 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374900-0.00002-8
Gros, B. (2016). The design of smart educational environments. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 15. Retrieved from https://slejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40561-016-0039-x
Eurostat (2019). Teachers in the EU. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/EDN-20191004-1
Finnish Excellence in Education, https://www.innofactor.com/what-we-do/modern-digital-organization/public-sector/education/
Jackson, L. A., Eye, A., Fitzgerald, H.E., Witt, E.A., & Zhao, Y. (2011). Internet use, videogame playing and cell phone use as predictors of children’s body mass index (BMI), body weight, academic performance, and social and overall self-esteem. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 599–604. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.019
Kaimara, P., Poulimenou, S.M., Oikonomou, A., Deliyannis, J., & Plerou, A. (2018). Smartphones at Schools? Yes, Why not? European Journal of Engineering Research and Science, 1-6. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.24018/ejers.2019.0.CIE.1288
Kim, T., Cho, J.Y., & Lee, B.G. (2013). Evolution to Smart Learningin Public Education: A Cas Study of Korean Public Education. In: Ley T., Ruohonen M., Laanpere M., Tatnall A. (eds). Open and Social Technologies for Networked Learning. OST 2012. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 395. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37285-8_18
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6-36.
Li, X., Atkins, M. S., & Stanton, B. (2006). Effects of home and school computer use on school readiness and cognitive development among head start children: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 239–263.
Linnenbrink, E.A. & Pintrich, P.R. (2003). The Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs Instudent Engagement and Learning in the Classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308223
Miltuze A., Sebre, B. & Vedeņejeva V. (2018). Pirmsskolas vecuma bērnu māšu audzināšanas pieeja, aktīva līdzdalība bērnu digitālajās aktivitātēs un to saistība ar bērnu uzvedības problēmām un prosociālu uzvedību. Society. Integration. Education, VII, 153-162. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3237
Marouli, C., Misseyanni, A., Papadopoulou, P., Lytras, M. (2016). ICT in Education for Sustainability: Contributions and Challenges. In International Conference The Future of Education (p. 189À193). Florence: Libreria universitaria.
Misják, B., Berecz, A., & Gabor, D. ( 2019). Developing Skills in Pre-School Age with Computer and Mobile Applications. Journal of Applied Multimedia 13(4), 97-101. DOI: 10.26648/JAM.2018.4.001.
Nathanson, A. I. (1999). Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children's aggression. Communication Research, 26(2), 124—143
OECD (2014). PISA 2012 Results in Focus. What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
Plowman, L., McPake, J., &Stephen, C. (2008). Just picking it up? Young children learning with technology at home. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(3), 303–319.
Rubene, Z. ( 2016). Tehnoloģiju integrēšana izglītībā – izaicinājums un iespējas skolotājam. Tagad, 1(10). Retrieved from http://www.telerehabilitation.lv/sites/default/files/Tagad_10_16.pdf
Schunk, D.H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159-172.
Siraj-Blatchford, I., & Siraj-Blatchford, J. (2006). A guide to developing the ICT curriculum for early childhood education. Trentham books.
Søby, M. (2014). Look to Denmark. Retrieved from
https://www.idunn.no/file/pdf/66722081/look_to_denmark.pdf
Spector, J.M. (2014). Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments. Smart learning environments, 1(1), 2. Retrieved from https://slejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40561-014-0002-7
Subrahmanyam, K., Kraut, R., Greenfield, P.M., & Gross, E.F.(2000). The Impact of Home Computer Use on Children's Activities and Development. The Future of Children 10(2), 123-144. DOI: 10.2307/1602692.
Toki, E.I., & Pange, J. (2010). E-learning activities for articulation in speech language therapy and learning for preschool children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4274-4278. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.678
Van den Bulck, J., & Van den Bergh, B. (2000). The influence of perceived parental guidance patterns on children’s media use: gender differences and media displacement. Journal of Broadcast & Electronic Media, 44, 329–348.
Vindece, A. & Usca, S. (2019). Language development and speech therapy support: literature analysis. Education Reform: Education Content Research and Implementation Problems. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/er2019.2.4367
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981b). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144-188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
Wu, C. S. T., Fowler, C., Lam, W. Y. Y., Wong, H. T., Wong, C. H. M., & Loke, A. Y. (2014). Parenting approaches and digital technology use of preschool age children in a Chinese community. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 40, 1-8.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
