DYNAMICS OF LEARNING MOTIVATION/ DE-MOTIVATION IN THE CONTEXT OF TEACHERS’ COMPETENCIES IN LEARNING MOTIVATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol1.4903Keywords:
dynamics of learning motivation, competencies in learning motivation, learning motivation/de-motivationAbstract
This article presents findings of the study of students’ attitude toward the dynamics of learning motivation/de-motivation and teachers’ competencies in learning motivation. The study is based on the assumption that students’ motivation in higher education (college or university) is to be supported and enhanced throughout their studies, while positive dynamics of it is subject to the use of learning motivation competencies by teachers in their teaching activities. It is highly important to identify the interrelation between teachers’ competencies in learning motivation and students’ motivation/de-motivation factors so that to establish tools for refining the objects under study, to enable a purposeful action, to make a focused intervention in the ongoing teaching processes for improvement thereof and obtaining better learning outcomes for students. Analysis of students’ attitude might help to respond more comprehensively the following problematic questions: What are motivation/de-motivation factors for student learning? What do teachers’ competencies in learning motivation consist of? In what ways can a teacher support the positive dynamics of learning motivation in students? Thus, this article is aimed to analyse factors for the dynamics of students’ motivation/de-motivation, a content of teachers’ competencies in learning motivation, and their practice from the students’ point of view. The article consists of an introduction and two parts: the first part provides theoretical discourse, the second part is dedicated to an empirical analysis of students’ attitude toward the learning motivation/de-motivation factors, teachers’ competencies in learning motivation, a content thereof, and dynamics of learning motivation. The article ends with a discussion and conclusions, followed by references.
References
Bagdonas, A., & Jankauskienė, I. (2017). Užsienio kalbų mokymosi poreikiai ir motyvacija. Mokslo taikomieji tyrimai Lietuvos kolegijose, 13, 77-85.
Bédard, D., & Viau, R. (2001). Le profil d’apprentissage des étudiantes et des étudiants de l’Université de Sherbrooke: résultats de l’enquête menée au trimestre d’automne 2000. (p. 74). Manuscrit inédit, Université de Sherbrooke, vice-rectorat à l’enseignement.
Bédard, D. (2014). Être enseignant ou devenir enseignant dans le supérieur : telle est la question... de posture ! In G. Lameul, & Loisy C. (Eds.), La pédagogie universitaire à l’heure du numérique (pp. 97-110). Brussels: De Boeck.
Bitinas, B. (2013). Rinktiniai edukologijos raštai. Edukologinis tyrimas: sistema ir procesas ugdymo tyrimų idėjos ir problemos, 2. Vilnius: Edukologija.
Bourgeois, E. (2011). La motivation à apprendre. In E. Bourgeois, & Chapelle G. (Eds.), Apprendre et faire apprendre, 2nd ed., 235-253. Paris: Presses Universelles de France.
Daele, A., & Sylvestre, E. (2013). Comment dynamiser un enseignement avec des grands effectifs? In Dans D. Berthiaume, & N. Rege Colet (Eds.), La pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur: repères théoriques et applications pratiques (pp. 149-164). Bern: Peter Lang.
Eccles, J.-S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Eccles, J.-S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A.-J Eliot, & C.-S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competency and motivation (pp. 105-121). New York: Guilford.
Fenouillet, F., & Lieury A. (2013). Motivation et réussite scolaire. Paris: Dunod.
Fukuzawa, S., Boyd, C., & Cahn, J. (2017). Student motivation in response to problem-based learning. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10, 175-188.
Jatkauskienė, B. (2013). Andragogų profesionalizacijos sistemos procesionali raiška. Monografija. Klaipėda: KU leidykla.
Jatkauskienė, B., & Andriekienė, R.M. (2013). Universiteto dėstytojų veiklos daugiafunkcionalumas profesionalizacijos kontekste. Klaipėdos universiteto atvejis. Monografija. Klaipėda: KU leidykla.
Jatkauskienė B., Andriekienė, R.M., & Trakšelys, K. (2015). Aukštojo mokslo didaktikos kompetencijų raiška dėstytojų veiklos kontekste. Studijos šiuolaikinėje visuomenėje. Mokslo darbai, 6(1).
Kairys, A., Liniauskaitė, A., Brazdeikienė, L., Bakševičius, L., Čepienė ,R., Mažeikienė-Gylienė, Ž., Rugevičius, M., Žakaitienė, A., & Žakaitis, P. (2017). Studentų akademinės motyvacijos skalės (SAM-21) struktūra. Psichologija, 55, 41-55.
Keibienė, R., Jonaitienė, L., & Daukilas, S. (2012). Studentų profesinės motyvacijos tyrimas. Sveikatos mokslai, 22 (5). Retrieved from
Matzler, J., & Woessmann, L. (2012). The Impact of Teacher Subject Knowledge on Student Achievement: Evidence from Within-Teacher Within-Student Variation. Journal of Development Economics, 99 (2), 486-496.
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Schunk, D.-H., & Parajes, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In Dans A. Wigfield, & J.-S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 16-31). New York: Academic Press inc.
Urnežienė, E., & Barkauskaitė, M. (2012). Apie mokymosi motyvaciją kaip ugdymo proceso sėkmės sąlygą. Retrieved 18 Dec 2019 from http://www.biblioteka.vpu.lt/pedagogika/PDF/2012/108/urniez38-42.pdf/
Viau, R., Joly, J., & Bédard, D. (2004). La motivation des étudiants en formation des maîtres à l’égard d’activités pédagogiques novatrices. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 30 (1) 163-176. doi: 10.7202/011775ar
Viau, R. (2014). Savoir motiver les étudiants. In Dans L. Ménard, & L. St-Pierre (Eds.), Se former à la pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur (pp. 235-254). Montréal: Chenelière éducation/AQPC.
Zmejov, S. I. (2010). Antropagogicheskie osnovy dejatel'nosti, kompetencij i kompetentnostej prepodavatelja vysshej shkoly v XXI veke. Vestnik MGLU, 16(595).