EUROPEAN ACCREDITATION AGENCY’S VIEW ON KAZAKHSTAN’S ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY HIGHER EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol1.4861Keywords:
accreditation agency view, engineering and Information Technology, expert perspective, higher education, needs analysis, non-structured interview, opinionAbstract
In the era of digital economy, there is an urgent need in highly qualified engineering and Information Technology (IT) specialists in Kazakhstan. The aim of the research is to analyse the needs of higher education in the field of engineering and IT in Kazakhstan underpinning elaboration of implications for higher education in the field of engineering and IT in Kazakhstan. The empirical study was carried out in October 2019. Exploratory study was implemented. Interpretive paradigm was employed in the present work. Non-structured interview served as the basis for data collection. Content analysis was performed for data analysis. Findings of theoretical analysis allow extending three-component model on needs analysis, namely experts’ perspective, educators’ perspective, and students’ perspective by the fourth component, namely community perspective. Implications for higher education in Kazakhstan are formulated as following: universities delivering higher education in the field of engineering and IT in Kazakhstan need to balance academic and practical components in their study programmes; interaction between educators and students, on the one side, as well as enterprises, companies and industry, on the other side, should be enhanced in higher education in the field of engineering and IT in Kazakhstan. Directions of future work are proposed.
References
Ahrens, A., & Zascerinska, J. (2012). Perspective of Game Theory in Sustainable Development. In: Stasys Vaitekunas (Ed), ATEE Spring University 2012 Conference 20 Years of Sustainable Development: Learning from Each Other, Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences, Vilnius, Lithuania, May 3-5, 2012, 99-108.
Ahrens, A., Bassus, O., & Zascerinska, J. (2013). Bi-professional Curriculum in Higher Education: Context Analysis. Proceedings of 6th ICEBE International Conference on Engineeirng and Business Education Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability, Windhoek, Namibia, 7 - 10 October 2013, 101-107.
Ahrens, A., Gruenwald, N., Zascerinska, J., Zakirova, G., Yefimova, I., Kakabayev, A., Melnikova, J., & Aleksejeva, L. (2018). Exploring ICT Education at Master Level in the Context of Advancement of Digital Ecosystem: The Case of Kazakhstan. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Volume I, 17-27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3147 .
Ahrens, A., Purvinis, O., Zascerinska, J., Miceviciene, D., & Tautkus, A. (2018). Burstiness Management for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth: Emerging Research and Opportunities. IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5442-4 .
Ahrens, A., Zascerinska, J., & Melnikova, J. (2019). Method for the Construction of Students’ Scientific Identity within English for Academic Purposes: The Case of International Students of Master Programme “Information and Electrical Engineering” at Hochschule Wismar. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Volume I, Higher Education, 43-53. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol1.3731 .
Ahrens, A., Zascerinska, J., Hariharan, R., & Andreeva, N. (2016). Educators’ Opinion on Webinars in Higher Education. Proceedings of the International Scientifical Conference Society, Integration, Education, Volume 1 Higher Education Pedagogy, 15-27.
Bassus, O., Ahrens, A., & Zascerinska, J. (2015). Analysis of Engineering Students‘ Needs in Interdisciplinary Education. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Engineering and Business Education 8-9 October 2015,. 26-31.
Budde, R. (2005). Mexican and Central American L.A. Garment Workers: Globalized Industries and their economic constraints. LIT Verlag Münster.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrsion, K. (2003). Research Methods in Education. London and New York: Routledge/Falmer Taylor & Francis Group.
Digital Kazakhstan. (2017). Government programme. Retrieved from https://digitalkz.kz/en/.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis. An Introduction to its Methodology. London: SAGE Publications.
Kroplijs, A., & Rascevska, M. (2004). Kvalitatīvās pētniecības metodes sociālajās zinātnēs. Rīga: RaKa.
Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative Content Analysis. In: U. Flick, E. Von Kardoff and I. Steinke (Eds). A Companion to Qualitative Research, pp. 266-269. SAGE, UK, Glasgow.
Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20,
Thanh, N.C. & Thanh, T.T.L. (2015). The Interconnection Between Interpretivist Paradigm and Qualitative Methods in Education. American Journal of Educational Science. Vol. 1, No. 2, 24-27. Retrieved from http://www.aiscience.org/journal/ajes
Zascerinska, J. (2013). Development of Students’ Communicative Competence within English for Academic Purposes Studies. Verlag: Mensch & Buch.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
