BALANCE BETWEEN LEADING AND FOLLOWING AND INTERNATIONAL PEDAGOGICAL INNOVATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol1.3978Keywords:
hands–on teaching style, international learning, international teaching, feedback, pedagogical innovations, transformational leadership, sustainability leadershipAbstract
The primary goal of this paper is to portray how the balance between leading and following can often guide us to new pedagogical innovations and leadership. First of all, we will examine how students’ feedback plays an essential role in devising new teaching styles that enhance the amiable learning atmosphere and directs us to new innovations and leadership. Second of all, we will focus on how feedback from colleagues can open new opportunities for new seminars, for new research projects, for writing new papers and textbooks and welcome us to new international and interdisciplinary teaching and learning atmosphere and new innovations. In addition, our aim is to address and understand the concerns and questions from students’ and colleagues’ feedback can be used to minimize the risk of failure and to steer us in designing new innovations and leadership. Furthermore, our intent is to portray that balance between leading and following is an essential technique in development of new ideas and innovations. Moreover, we will share examples of successful pedagogical innovations that were suggested by students and colleagues. Throughout this paper we will remit the following vital question: do creativity and innovations come directly from us?
References
Brooks,J.S., Normore, A.H. (2010). Educational Leadership and Globalization: Literact for a Glocal Perspective, Sage:Educational Policy, 24(1), 52 – 82.
Corley, T. (2010). Rich Habits: The Key to Success and a Happy Future. Langdon Street Press.
Herman, R.L. (2011). What Makes an Excellend Professor? TheJournal of Effective Teaching, 11(1), 1–5.
Huberman, M. (1983). The role of teacher education in the improvement of educational practice: A linkage model. European Journal of Teacher Education, 6(1), 17–29.
Hussain, M., Khan, S. (2016). Students’ feedback: An effective tool in teachers’ evaluation system. International Journal of Applied Basic Medical Research, 6(3), 178–181.
Kennedy, D., McGarthy, D. (2013). Feedback in the Academic and Industrial Environment. INTED 2013, Valencia, Spain, 4 – 6.
Orlova, O., Radin, M. (2018). University level teaching styles with high school students and international teaching and learning. The proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Sociaty, Integraton, Education”, V. 1, 464-475.
Radin, M., Riashschenko, V. (2017). Effective pedagogical management as a road to successful international teaching and learning. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 5(4), 71-84.
Radomska, J. (2014). Operational Risk associated with the Strategy Implementation. De Gruyter, 18(2), 31–43.
Shields, P.M. (2003). A pragmatic teaching philosophy. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 9(1), 7 – 12.
Smallbone, T., Quinton, S. (2010). Feeding forward: Using feedback to promote student reflection and learning–a teaching model. Journal of Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 125 – 135.
Wiggins, G. (2012). Seven Keys to Effective Feedback. Educational Leadership, 70(1), 10 – 16.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
