THE MANIFESTATION OF THE MICROPOLITICS IN CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol2.3968Keywords:
micropolitics, curriculum, self-educationAbstract
The purpose of the research paper is to disclose the manifestation of micropolitics in curriculum development. The objectives of the research are: 1) to analyze scientific literature by presenting the main concepts; 2) to discuss how they help to develop a curriculum. The novelty is that the research is based on the postructuralism theory, where micropolitics is not only a resistance, but also a novelty, in this case self-education. The research method is hermeneutic review of literature. It is important to understand the meaning and importance of individual texts, which, in turn, can be seen as parts of the whole body. The analysis of scientific literature revealed that the main concepts are the following: rhizome, assemblages, the strata, and micropolitics. Self-education should be implemented through rhizomatic learning, observation of self-education, creation of new learning territories and a favourable micro environment.
References
Amirkhanova, A., Davletkalieva, E., Muldasheva, B., Kibataeva, N., Satygliyeva, G., & Arynhanova, E. (2015). A Model of Self-Education Skills in High Education System. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 782-789.
Alexander, R. J. (2009). Pedagogy, Culture and the Power of Comparison. In Daniels, H., Lauder, H and Porter, J. (Eds.). Educational theories, cultures and learning: A critical perspective, 10-26. London: Routledge.
Alvunger, D. (2018). Teachers’ Curriculum Agency in Teaching a Standards-Based Curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 1-20, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1486721
Bjork, L. G., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2016). International Perspectives on the Micropolitics of the Superintendency. Educational Administration and Leadership, 1(1), 121–156.
Brosky, D. (2011). Micropolitics in the School: Teacher Leaders' Use of Political Skill and Influence Tactics. International Journal Of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6(1), 1-11.
Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2014). A Hermeneutic Approach for Conducting Literature Reviews and Literature Searches. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 32, 257-286.
Caruso, L. F. (2013). The Micropolitics of Educational Change Experienced by Novice Public Middle school Principals. NASSP Bulletin, 97 (3), 218–252.
Chan, K. H. (2010). Rethinking Children’s Participation in Curriculum Making: A Rhizomatic Movement. In Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (Ed.) (2010). Flows, Rhythms, and Intensities of Early Childhood Education Curriculum, 107–122. New York: Peter Lan.
Conway, C., Rawlings, J., & Hibbard, S. (2018). Music Teachers’ Descriptions of Their Workplaces in Relation to Micropolitics. Music Education Research, 20(3), 305-316.
Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic Education: Community as Curriculum Innovate. Journal of Online Education, 4(5), 1-8.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: University of Minnesota Press.
Duoblienė, L. (2017). Šizoidinė mokytojų situacija: pavojus tapatybei ir kūrybiškumo prielaida. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 38, 11-24.
Duoblienė, L. (2013). Erdvės ir laiko sampratos ugdymo filosofijoje: nuo mokslinės pedagogikos prie kasdienės praktikos. Problemos, 83, 121-132.
Gadamer, H (2001). Education is Self Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35 (4). 529-538.
Garbauskaitė-Jakimovska, J. (2018). Neformaliojo ugdymo ribos: poststrūktalizmo perspektyva. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, 40, 142-154.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In. Denzin N. K. & Lincoln Y. S. (Eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research (105-117). London: Sage.
Isriyah, M., & Lasan, M. (2018). Classical Philosophy: Influence the Education Philosophy of Age. Jurnal Bimbingan den Konseling, 1, 202-208, Retrieved from: https://ejournal-bk.unindra.ac.id/index.php/teraputik
Jayanaik, P. R. (2016). Interaction of Micropolitics and Education Quality: Commentary on Infrastructure and Curriculum. International Education and Research Journal, 2 (5), 75-80.
Karkkainen, K. (2012). Bringing About Curriculum Innovations: Implicit Approaches in the OECD Area, OECD Education Working Papers, 82, Paris: OECD Publishing.
Kimer, M., Tuul, M., & Õun, T. (2016). Implementation of Different Teaching Practices in Early Childhood Education Practice in Estonia. Early Years, 36(4), 368-382.
Konokman, Y. G., Yelken, Y. T., Karasolak, K., & Cesur, E. (2017). Teachers’ Perception: Competent or Not in Curriculum Development. Malaysian, Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(4), 56-73.
Levin, B. (2007). Curriculum Politicy and the Politics of what should be Learned at School. In. Connelly, M., & Fillion J. (Eds.). Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction. Publisher: Sage, 7-24.
Lyotard, F. (1993). Postmodernus būvis. Vilnius: Baltos lankos.
Mackness, J., & Bell, F. (2015). Rhizo14: A Rhizomatic Learning cMOOC in Sunlight and in Shade. Open Praxis, 7(1), 25-38
Oudeweetering, K., & Voogt, J. (2018) Teachers’ Conceptualization and Enactment of Twenty-First Century Competences: Exploring Dimensions for New Curricula, The Curriculum Journal, 29(1), 116-133, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2017.1369136
Resh, N., & Benavot, A. (2009). Educational Governance, School Autonomy and Curriculum Implementation: Diversity and Uniformity in Knowledge Offering to Israeli Pupils. Jounal of Curriculum Studies, 41(1), 67-72.
Storm, K. J. (2015).Teaching as Assemblage: Negotiating Learning and Practice in the First Year of Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education. 1-13.
Rai, A. K., & Rai, M. K. (2016). Micro-Politics in Educational Institute and Curriculum Development. The Equonomist, 2 (1), 47-53.
Roy, K. (2003). Teacher in Nomandic Spaces: Deleuze and Curriculum. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Semetsky, I., & Delpech – Ramey, J. A. (2012). Jung's Psychology and Deleuze's Philosophy: The unconscious in Learning, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(1), 69-81, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00670.x
The Law of Lithuanian Education (2011). Retrieved from: https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/TAIS.395105
Ozola, A. (2017). Young Children‘s Freedom of Choice in Child Centred Educational Practice. Society. Integration. Education, 2, 308-317.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
