SELF-ASSESSMENT OF COMMUNICATION SKILLS OF HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS: A QUANTITATIVE STUDY

Authors

  • Aelita Skarbalienė Klaipeda University (LT)
  • Egidijus Skarbalius Klaipeda University (LT)
  • Lina Gedrimė Klaipeda University, Republic Klaipeda Hospital, Klaipeda State University of Applied Sciences (LT)
  • Lolita Rapolienė Klaipeda University (LT)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol4.3867

Keywords:

communication skills, communication skills self-assessment, healthcare, social skills

Abstract

Communication and social skills are becoming increasingly valuable in the 21st century. Despite increasing awareness of the importance of communication skills in modern healthcare practice, there is a lack of research that addresses this issue. The aim of this research is to assess the communication skills of healthcare professionals working in Lithuanian healthcare institutions. Respondents (n=1154) were asked to assess their own communication skills using the Interpersonal Communication Skills Inventory. The research revealed that sending clear message skills were the strongest and giving/getting feedback skills were the lowest for most of the respondents, including physicians, head nurses, nurse, nurse assistants, and other personnel. The strongest aspects were that respondents can talk to other people and others seemed to be interested and attentive when healthcare specialists were talking because in conversation they were trying to talk about things of interest to both them and the other persons. The respondents could recognize as well how others were reacting to what they were saying. However, they did not always care how other person feels about the point they try to make. Emotional interaction skills were the lowest for most of the respondents in this study. They saw a tendency to change the subject when other person’s feelings enter into the discussion and it was difficult for them to think when they were angry with someone. It was summarized that talking, listening, and emotional interaction skills of the respondents are the areas that need more consistent attention, and giving / getting feedback is the skill that needs much improvement.

 

References

Alotaibi, B. (2018). Nurses Communication Barriers in Healthcare Centers: Patients’ Perspectives, International Journal of Nursing Didactics, 8(1), 24-34.

Arora, N. (2003). Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior. Social science and medicine, 57(5), 791-806.

Asnani, M.R. (2009). Patient-physician communication. West Indian Medical Journal, 58(4), 357-361.

Choudhary, A., & Gupta, V. (2015). Teaching communications skills to medical students: Introducing the fine art of medical practice, International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, 5(4), 41-44.

Cote, L., & Leclere, H. (2000). How clinical teachers perceive the doctor–patient relationship and themselves as role models, Academic Medicine, 75, 1117–1124.

Fong Ha, J., & Longnecker, N. (2010). Doctor-Patient Communication: A Review, Ochsner Journal, 10(1), 38-43.

George, S., Rahmatinick, S., & Ramos, J. (2018). Commit to Sit to Improve Nurse Communication, Critical Care Nurse, 38(2), 83-85.

Hobgood, C.D., Riviello, R.J., Jouriles, N., & Hamilton, G. (2002). Assessment of Communication and Interpersonal Skills Competencies, Academic Emergency Medicine, 9, 1257–1269.

Koenig, J.A. (2011). Assessing 21st century skills. Summary of a Workshop. The National Academies Press: Washington, DC.

Laidlaw, T.S., Kaufman, D.M., Macleod, H., Sargeant, J., & Langille, D.B. (2001). Patients’ satisfaction with their family physicians’ communication skills: a Nova Scotia survey, Academic Medicine, 76, S77–S79.

Learning Dynamics (2002). Interpersonal Communication Skills Inventory. Retrieved from https://wicworks.fns.usda.gov/wicworks/Sharing_Center/CT/Inventory.pdf

Lee, S.J., Back, A.L., Block, S.D., Stewart, S.K. (2002). Enhancing physician-patient communication. Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Programme, 1, 464-483.

Lum, L., Dowedoff, P., & Englander, K. (2016). Internationally educated nurses’ reflections on nursing communication in Canada, International Nursing Review, 63(3), 344-351.

McGuire, P., Fairbaim, S., & Fletcher, C. (1986). Consultation skills of young doctors. Most young doctors are bad at giving information. British Medical Journal, 292, 1576–2578.

Oh, J., Segal, R., Gordon, J., Boal, J., & Jotkowitz, A. (2001). Retention and use of patient-centered interviewing skills after intensive training, Academic Medicine, 76, 647–650.

Park, S. (2017). Differences between Nurses and Patients' Perception of Nurses' Communication Skills, Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 29(2), 166-176.

Pawlikowska, T.R.B., Walker, J.J., Nowak, P.R., & Szumilo-Grzesik, W. (2010). Patient involvement in assessing consultation quality: a quantitative study of the Patient Enablement Instrument in Poland, Health Expectations, 13(1), 13–23.

Pereira, T.J, & Puggina, A.C. (2017). Validation of the self-assessment of communication skills and professionalism for nurses. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 70(3), 588-94.

Rajashree, K.C. (2011). Training Programs in Communication Skills for Health Care Professionals and Volunteers. Indian Journal of Palliative Care, 17: S12–S13. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.76232

Roter, D.L., Hall, J.A., Aoki, Y. (2002). Physician gender effects in medical communication: a meta-analytic review. JAMA, 288(6), 756-764.

Silva, M.J.P. (2015). Comunicação tem remédio: a comunicação nas relações interpessoais em saúde. 10th edition. São Paulo: Loyola.

Wittenberg, E., Ferrell, B., Goldsmith, J., Buller, H., & Neiman, T. (2016). Nurse Communication About Goals of Care, Journal of Advanced Practitioner in Oncology, 7, 146–154.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-21

How to Cite

Skarbalienė, A., Skarbalius, E., Gedrimė, L., & Rapolienė, L. (2019). SELF-ASSESSMENT OF COMMUNICATION SKILLS OF HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS: A QUANTITATIVE STUDY. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 4, 277-286. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol4.3867