GAIT PARTITIONING WITH SMART SOCKS SYSTEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol4.3844Keywords:
gait analysis, gait phase partitioning, Smart socksAbstract
Gait is a very complex movement, involving the central nervous system and a significant part of the skeletomuscular system. Any disease that is affecting one or more of the involved parts will reflect in the gait. Therefore, gait analysis has been studied extensively in the context of early disease diagnostics, post-operation rehabilitation monitoring, and sports injury prevention. Gait cycle phase partitioning is one of the most common gait characteristic analysis methods, which utilizes the cyclical nature of human gait. Pressure sensitive mats and insoles are considered the gold standard, but some inherent limitations of these methods urge researchers to seek for alternatives. One of the proposed alternatives is Smart Sock systems, which contain textile pressure sensors. The main limitation of Smart Sock systems is the limited number of sensors, thus complicating gait phase partitioning by these systems. The present paper describes gait phase partitioning using plantar pressure signal obtained by a Smart Sock system. Six-phase partitioning was achieved, including such gait phases as initial contact, loading response, mid stance, terminal stance, pre-swing and swing phase. Mean gait cycle time values obtained from the experimental data were in accordance with the ones found in the literature.
References
Herzog, W., Nigg, B. M., Read, L. J., & Olsson, E. (1989). Asymmetries in ground reaction force patterns in normal human gait. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 21(1), 110–114. DOI:10.1249/00005768-198902000-00020
Joshi, C. D., Lahiri, U., & Thakor, N. V. (2013). Classification of gait phases from lower limb EMG: Application to exoskeleton orthosis. 2013 IEEE Point-of-Care Healthcare Technologies (PHT). DOI:10.1109/pht.2013.6461326
Kong, P. W., & De Heer, H. (2009). Wearing the F-Scan mobile in-shoe pressure measurement system alters gait characteristics during running. Gait & Posture, 29(1), 143–145. DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.05.018
Chen, M., Huang, B., & Xu, Y. (2008). Intelligent shoes for abnormal gait detection. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. DOI:10.1109/robot.2008.4543503
Mileti, I., Germanotta, M., Alcaro, S., Pacilli, A., Imbimbo, I., Petracca, M., Palermo, E. (2017). Gait partitioning methods in Parkinson’s disease patients with motor fluctuations: A comparative analysis. 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA). DOI:10.1109/memea.2017.7985910
Perry, J., and Burnfield, J. M. (2010). Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function. New York, NY: Slack Inc
Santuz, A., Ekizos, A., & Arampatzis, A. (2015). A Pressure Plate-Based Method for the Automatic Assessment of Foot Strike Patterns During Running. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 44(5), 1646–1655. DOI:10.1007/s10439-015-1484-3
Selles, R. W., Formanoy, M. A. G., Bussmann, J. B. J., Janssens, P. J., & Stam, H. J. (2005). Automated Estimation of Initial and Terminal Contact Timing Using Accelerometers; Development and Validation in Transtibial Amputees and Controls. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 13(1), 81–88. DOI:10.1109/tnsre.2004.843176
Stöckel, T., Jacksteit, R., Behrens, M., Skripitz, R., Bader, R., & Mau-Moeller, A. (2015). The mental representation of the human gait in young and older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00943
Taborri, J., Palermo, E., Rossi, S., & Cappa, P. (2016). Gait Partitioning Methods: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 16(1), 66. DOI:10.3390/s16010066
Zhang, T., Lu, J., Uswatte, G., Taub, E., & Sazonov, E. S. (2014). Measuring gait symmetry in children with cerebral palsy using the SmartShoe. 2014 IEEE Healthcare Innovation Conference (HIC). DOI:10.1109/hic.2014.7038871
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
