3D PRINTING TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN ANATOMY MODERN TEACHING AND LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol1.3713Keywords:
education, Human Anatomy, model, printingAbstract
There are various combinations of 3D printing technology and medical study process. The aim of this study was to summarize our first experience on 3D printing and outline how 3D printed models can be successfully used in Human Anatomy modern teaching and learning. In 2018 autumn semester, together with traditional methods, a three-dimensional (3D) printing has been introduced into Human Anatomy curriculum at Department of Morphology. In practical classes 39 groups of students from Faculty of Medicine 1st year together with 3 tutors used 3 different open source softwares to create anatomical models and prepared them for printing process. All anatomical models were produced using an FDM 3D printer, a Prusa i3 MK2 (Prusa Research). As methods for data collection were used our observational notes during teaching and learning, analysis of discussions between tutors and students, comments on the preparing and usability of the created and printed models. 3D printing technology offered students a powerful tool for their teaching, learning and creativity, provided possibility to show human body structures or variations. Presented data offered valuable information about current situation and these results were suitable for the further development of the Human Anatomy study course.
References
AbouHashem, Y., Dayal, M., Savanah, S. & Štrkalj, G. (2015). The application of 3D printing in anatomy education. Medical Education Online, 20(1), 29847. DOI:10.3402/meo.v20.29847
Bartikian, M., Ferreira, A., Gonçalves-Ferreira, A. & Neto, L. L. (2018). 3D printing anatomical models of head bones. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 1-5. DOI:10.1007/s00276-018-2148-4.
Coles-Black, J., Chao, I. & Chuen, J. (2017). Three-dimensional printing in medicine. Medical Journal of Australia, 207(3), 102-103. DOI:10.5694/mja16.01073
Drake, R. L. & Wojciech, P. (2017). A growing voice for anatomy educators. Anatomical Sciences Education, 10(1), 5-6. DOI:10.1002/ase.1678
Drake, R. L. & Wojciech, P. (2014). An Addition to the neighborhood: 3D printed anatomy teaching resources. Anatomical Sciences Education, 7(6), 419-419. DOI:10.1002/ase.1500
Eizenberg, N. & Chapuis P. (2014). Anatomy teaching to medical students and future trainees: the paradigm shift. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 84(11), 806-808. DOI:10.1111/ans.12847
Khalil, M. K., Eiman, M., Meguid, A. & Elkhider, I. A. (2018). Teaching of anatomical sciences: A blended learning approach. Clinical Anatomy, 31(3), 323-329. DOI:10.1002/ca.23052
Kim, G. B., Lee, S., Kim, H., Yang, D. H., Kim, Y. H., Kyung, Y. S., Kim C., Choi, S., Kim, B., Hojin, H., Kwon, S. U. & Kim, N. (2016). Three-Dimensional Printing: Basic Principles and Applications in Medicine and Radiology. Korean Journal of Radiology, 17(2), 182-197. DOI:10.3348/kjr/2016/17.2.182
Li, K., Kui, C., Lee, E., Ho, C., Wong, S., Wu, W., Voll, J., Li, G., Liu, T., Yan, B., Chan, J., Tse, G. & Keenan, I. (2017). The role of 3D printing in anatomy education and surgical training: A narrative review. MedEdPublish, 6 June. DOI:10.15694/mep.2017.000092
McMenamin, P. G., Quayle, M. R., McHenry, C. R. & Adams, J. W. (2014). The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anatomical Sciences Education, 7, 479-486. DOI:10.1002/ase.1475
Michalski, M. H. & Ross, J. S. (2014). The shape of things to come: 3D printing in medicine. JAMA, 312, 2213-2214. DOI:10.1001/jama.2014.9542
Mogali, S. R., Yeong, W. Y., Tan, H. K. J., Tan, G. J. S., Abrahams, P. H., Zary, N., Low-Beer, N. & Ferenczi, M. A. (2018). Evaluation by medical students of the educational value of multi-material and multi-colored three-dimensional printed models of the upper limb for anatomical education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11(1), 54-64. DOI:10.1002/ase.1703
Moore, C. W., Wilson, T. D. & Rice, C. L. (2017). Digital preservation of anatomical variation: 3D-modeling of embalmed and plastinated cadaveric specimens using CT and MRI. Annals of Anatomy, 209, 69-75. DOI:10.1016/j.aanat.2016.09.010
Negi, S., Dhiman, S. & Kumar Sharma, R. (2014). Basics and applications of rapid prototyping medical models. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 20, 256-267. DOI:10.1108/RPJ-07-2012-0065
Ruzycki, S. M., Desy, J. R., Lachman, N. & Wolanskyj-Spinner, A. P. (2018). Medical education for millennials: How anatomists are doing it right. Clinical Anatomy, 32(1), 20-25.
DOI:10.1002/ca.23259
Schaefer, A. F., Wilson, A. B., Barger, J. B., Azim, H. M., Brokaw, J. J. & Brooks, W. S. (2018). What Does a Modern Anatomist Look like? Current Trends in the Training of Anatomy Educators. Anatomical Sciences Education, 0, 1-11. DOI:10.1002/ase.1806
Smith, M. L. & Jones, J. F. X. (2017). Dual-extrusion 3D printing of anatomical models for education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11(1), 65-72. DOI:10.1002/ase.1730
Smith, C. F., Tollemache, N., Covill, D. & Johnston, M. (2017). Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11(1), 44-53. DOI:10.1002/ase.1718
Tack, P., Victor, J., Gemmel, P. & Annemans, L. (2016). 3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 15(1), 115. DOI:10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4
Trelease, R. B. (2016). From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e-learning: How computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(6), 583-602. DOI:10.1002/ase.1620
Violante, M. G. & Vezzetti, E. (2017). Guidelines to design engineering education in the twenty-first century for supporting innovative product development. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), 1344. DOI:10.1080/03043797.2017.1293616
Yammine, K. (2015). The current status of anatomy knowledge: where are we now? Where do we need to go and how do we get there? Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 26, 184-188.
DOI: 10.1080/10401334.2014.883985
Yeom, S., Choi-Lundberg, D. L., Fluck, A. E. & Sale, A. (2017). Factors influencing undergraduate students’ acceptance of a haptic interface for learning gross anatomy. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(1), 50-66. DOI:10.1108/ITSE-02-2016-0006
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
