• Lina Kaminskiene Vytautas Magnus University, Institute of Education
  • Nano Khetsuriani Vytautas Magnus University and Eruditas Lyceum



co-creation of learning, personalised learning, students’ engagement


The paper focuses on the co-creation of learning as a contemporary approach to engage learners. Today researchers discuss different engaging practices based on the learner-centred strategies, trying to respond to variety of personal learning needs, requirements and interests. By having a central role in the process, learners can decide how to organize their learning based on their abilities and stay actively engaged in the process. The idea of learners as change agents, active partners, producers and co-creators of their own learning has been a topic of increased interest in recent years. Development of student-led, collaborative initiatives leads educational institutions towards promoting co-creating of learning processes and co-created learning outputs.

Author Biographies

  • Lina Kaminskiene, Vytautas Magnus University, Institute of Education
    Director of the Institute of Education, assoc. prof.
  • Nano Khetsuriani, Vytautas Magnus University and Eruditas Lyceum
    MA in Educational Management, candidate to doctoral studies at VMU


Bain, K., Zimmerman, J. (2009). Understanding Great Teaching. Good Teaching: What Is It and How Do We Measure It? 11(2), 9–12.

Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2015). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. The International Journal of Higher Education Research 71(2), 195-208. DOI:

Bray, B., McClaskey, K. (2015). Make learning personal: The What, Who, WOW, Where, and Why. USA: Corwin SAGE Publications.

Brundrett, M., Silcock, P. (2002) Achieving Competence, Success and Excellence in Teaching. London: Routledge.

Carey, P. (2013). Student as co-producer in a marketised higher education system: a case study of students’ experience of participation in curriculum design. Journal of Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50 (3), 250– 260. DOI:

Cole, J. E. Kritzer J.B. (2017). Strategies for success: Teaching an online course. SAGE Journals Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28(4), 36-40. DOI:

Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., Felten, P. (2014). Engaging Students as Partners in Teaching and Learning: A Guide for Faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Dunne, E., Zandstra, R. (2011). Students as change agents: new ways of engaging with learning and teaching in higher education. University of Exeter: Corp creators.

Educause (2012). 7 things you should know about flipped classrooms. Educause Learning Initiative, 376. Retrieved from:

Fraser, S. P., Bosanquet, A. M. (2006). The curriculum? That’s just a unit outline, isn’t it? Journal of Studies in Higher Education 31(3), 269–284. DOI:

Gärdebo, J. & Wiggberg, M. (2012). Students, the university’s unspent resource. In J. Gärdebo & M. Wiggberg (Eds.) Revolutionizing higher education through active student participation (7-14). Sweden: Uppsala Universitet Press.

Grant, P., Basye, D. (2014). Personalized Learning: A Guide for Engaging Students with Technology. Washington DC: Eugene Oregon.

Green, H., Dillon, P., & Humphreys, P. (2005). Futurelab: Personalization and digital technologies, 337. Retrieved from:

Jarvis, R.G. (2016). Culture, Curriculum, and Consciousness: Resurrecting the Educational Praxis of Dr. Carter G. Woodson, 1875-1950. University of California: California Digital Library.

Kelly, A., V. (2004). The Curriculum: Theory and Practice. London: Thousand Oaks.

King, C., Felten, P. (2012) Threshold Concepts in Educational Development: An Introduction. The Journal of Faculty Development, 26(3), 5-7.

Kreps, G. L. (1998). The power of story to personalize, enrich, and humanize communication education: My own story about having fun spinning tales, and illustrating key points in the classroom. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Conference, New York, NY. Retrieved from:

Lee, M., McLoughlin, C. (2010) Personalized and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26 (1), 28-43. DOI:

Loyens, S., Gijbels, D. (2008). Understanding the effects of constructivist learning environments. Journal of Instructional Science, 36 (5-6), 351–357. DOI: