ANALYSIS OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS' COGNITIVE PROFILES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol2.3677Keywords:
cognitive abilities, cognitive reflection, the implicit theory of intelligence, intelligence, pre-service teachersAbstract
In recent years there has been increased attention to the problem of teachers' competences. The need for developing critical thinking in schools turns the focus also on the teachers' cognitive skills including not only intelligence but also cognitive reflection and implicit theories of intelligence. This study aimed to analyse pre-service teachers' (N = 344) cognitive profiles covering data from cognitive reflection test (CRT), implicit theories of intelligence test and Mannheim intelligence test (MIT, measuring verbal, numerical and spatial abilities). Significant correlations were found between cognitive reflection and other cognitive abilities. However, the implicit theories of intelligence seemed to be independent of cognitive abilities. Significant differences between senior and junior pre-service teachers were found in cognitive reflection and two MIT items. Based on the presented results, we discuss the assessment of pre-service teachers’ competences and the development of critical and higher order thinking in pre-gradual teacher education.
References
Baldi, P. L., Iannello, P., Riva, S., & Antonietti, A. (2013). Cognitive reflection and socially biased decisions. Studia Psychologia, 55(4), 265-271.
Blackwell, L., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.
Čavojová, V. (2015). Problem with reflective learning is lack of reflective teaching. In ICERI2015 Proceedings (pp. 6521-6528). Seville: 8th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. Retrieved from https://library.iated.org/view/CAVOJOVA2015PRO
Čavojová, V. (2016). O čom je reč, keď hovoríme o racionalite a kritickom myslení. In: V. Čavojová, et al. (Eds.). Rozum: návod na použitie. Psychológia racionálneho myslenia (pp. 69−87). Bratislava: Iris.
Čavojová, V., & Jurkovič, M. (2017). Comparison of experienced vs. novice teachers in cognitive reflection and rationality. Studia Psychologica, 59(3), 100−112.
Conrad, W. et al. (1993). Mannheimský inteligenčný test [Mannheim Intelligence Test]. Bratislava: Psychodiagnostika.
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Taylor & Francis: Philadelphia. PA.
Dweck, C. S. (2008). Can Personality Be Changed? The Role of Beliefs in Personality and Change. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 391-394.
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25-40.
Grönqvist, E., & Vlachos, J. (2008). One size fits all? The effect of teacher cognitive and non-cognitive abilities on student achievement. Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation, Uppsala. Working paper series 25.
Hong, Y., Chiu, Ch., Dweck, C. S., Lin, L., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit Theories, Attributions and Coping: A Meaning System Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588-599.
Huber, S. A., & Seidel, T. (2018). Comparing teacher and student perspectives on the interplay of cognitive and motivational-affective student characteristics. PLoS ONE 13(8), 1-21.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar. Straus and Giroux.
Kohut, M. Halama, P., Dočkal, V., & Žitný, P. (2016) Gender differential item functioning in Slovak version of intelligence structure test 2000 – Revised. Studia Psychologica, 58(3), 238-250.
Kosturková, M. (2013). Kritické myslenie pedagógov stredných škôl. Pedagogika.sk, 4(4), 283-298.
OECD, (2007). Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/edu/school/creatingeffectiveteachingandlearningenvironmentsfirstresultsfromtalis.htm
Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It's ok — Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 731–737.
Raven, J. C. et al. (1991). Ravenove progresívne matice pre pokročilých [Raven Progressive Matrices Test - Advanced]. Bratislava: Psychodiagnostika.
Rindermann, H. (2007). The g-Factor of International Cognitive Ability Comparisons: The Homogeneity of Results in PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and IQ-Tests across Nations. European Journal of Personality, 21, 667–706.
Sokolová, L., Jursová Zacharová, Z., & Lemešová, M. (2017). Developing psychological literacy in the pre-gradual teacher training. In ICPS 2017. Retrieved from https://osf.io/p7r3n/wiki/home/
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and brain sciences, 23, 645-726.
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the Relative Independence of Thinking Biases and Cognitive Ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 672-695.
Sternberg, R. J. (2011). Cognitive Psychology. Cengage Learning.
Sternberg, R. J., Roediger, H. L., & Halpern, D. F. (eds.) (2007). Critical Thinking in Psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
