• Grazina Ciuladiene Institute of Educational Sciences and Social Work, Mykolas Romeris University
  • Brigita Kairiene Institute of Educational Sciences and Social Work, Mykolas Romeris University



conflict resolution, student, teacher


The significant thing for teachers is to settle conflicts with students correctly and effectively without disrupting educational process and damaging the relationship. Dispite teacher-student conflicts are unevitable, and important consequences arise there from, teacher-student conflicts remain poorly studied. The present study aims to examine the strategies teachers use to resolve teacher-student conflicts. To investigate the process of conflict between a teacher and a student, a case study method was used. Respondents – teachers - were asked to recall a conflict occurring between them and a student during the school years, describe how the incident was handled, and the consequences of it. The number of respondents constituted 31 teachers. Their average age was 43, 6 years. By gender there were 2 males and 29 females; work experience was from 2 till 35 years.

An analysis of the cases enabled to distinguish two groups of teachers’ reactions to the conflicts. One of them is focus on communication with student on the issue and discovering of the reasons of his / her behaviour. Resolving conflict in a cooperative way involves teacher’s endeavours to perceive accurately student’s positions and motivation, recognise the legitimacy of each other’s interests, and search for a solution accommodating the needs of both sides. The second group of teachers’ reactions to the conflicts manifests itself by the lack of the reflection of the motives and causes of the student’s inappropriate behaviour. Thus, recorded conflicts are considered as non cooperative (destructive) ones.

This study give insight into the role of teacher in relation to conflict resolution with student. Findings of the study emphasize the need for teachers to critically determine meaningful conflict resolution strategies.


Berg, B. L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social science. Long Beach: California State University.

Blunk, E. M., Russell, E. M. & Armga, C. J. (2017). The role of teachers in peer conflict: implications for teacher reflections. Teacher Development, 21 (5), 597-608. DOI: 10.1080/13664530.2016.1273847

Ciuladiene, G. & Kairiene, B. (2017). The resolution of conflict between teacher and student: students’ narratives. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19 (2), 107-120.

Ciuladienė, G. & Raudeliunaite, R. (2015). Whether relations between students and teachers are constructive at contemporary school? Procedia - social and behavioral sciences, 191, 2855-2860.

Ficarra, L. & Quinn, K. (2014). Teachers‘ Facility with Evidence-Based Classroom Management Practices: An Investigation of Teachers‘ Preparation Programmes and In-service Conditions. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(2),71-87. DOI: 10.2478/jtes-2014-0012

Horan, S. M., Chory, R. M. & Goodboy, A. K. (2010). Understanding Students’ Classroom Justice Experiences and Responses. Communication Education, 59 (4), 453-474.

Jenkins, S., Ritblatt, S. & McDonald, J. S. (2008). Conflict Resolution among Early Childhood Educators. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 25 (4), 429–450.

Kairiene, B. (2017). Mokinio pareigos: įgyvendinimo problema. [The duties of a pupil: the implementation problem]. Pedagogika, 126, 2, 130-142.

Kurdi, V. & Archambault, I. (2017). Student-Teacher Relationships and Student Anxiety: Moderating Effects of Sex and Academic Achievement. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 1-15. DOI: 10.1177/0829573517707906

Kuurme, T. & Carlsson, A. (2010). The Factors of Well-Being in Schools as a Living Environment according to Studentsí Evaluation. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 12(2), 70-88. DOI: 10.2478/v10099-009-0055-9

McCormick, M. P. & O’Connor, E. E. (2015). Teacher–child relationship quality and academic achievement in elementary school: Does gender matter? Journal of Educational Psychology, 107 (2), 502-516. doi:10.1037/a0037457

Oetzel, J. & Ting-Toomey, S. (2003). Face concerns in interpersonal conflict: A cross-cultural empirical test of the face negotiation theory. Communication Research, 30, 599–624.

Okeke, Ch. I. & Mtyuda, P. N. (2017). Teacher Job Dissatisfaction: Implications for Teacher Sustainability and Social Transformation. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(1), 54-68. DOI: 10.1515/jtes-2017-0004.

Ortega, J. L. G. & Fuentes, A. R. (2015). Communication Skills Training in Trainee Primary School Teachers in Spain. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability,17(1): 86-98. DOI: 0.1515/jtes-2015-0007.

Sakk, M. (2013). Coping at School - Academic Success or/ and Sustainable Coping in Future? Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 15(1), 84-106. DOI: 10.2478/jtes-2013-0006

Van de Vliert, E., Ohbuchi, K., Van Bas, R., Hayashi, Y. & Van der Vegt, G. (2004). Conglomerated Contending by Japanese Subordinates. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15 (2), 192-207.

Wilmot, W. & Hocker, J. (2001). Interpersonal Conflict. New York: McGrawHill.

Yssel, N., Beilke, J. R.,. Church, K. L. & Zimmerman J. S. (2001). CoRE: A conceptual model for incorporating conflict resolution into teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 36 (4), 295-305. DOI: 10.1080/08878730109555273