PRECONDITIONS FOR ENHANCING SOCIO-EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO INDIVIDUALS SERVING NON-CUSTODIAL SENTENCES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3217Keywords:
individuals prone to criminal behavior, unrelated to the use of psychoactive substances, and serving non-custodial sentences, motivational interview, socio-educational assistanceAbstract
The paper focuses on the issue of socio-educational assistance to people prone to criminal behavior, unrelated to the use of psychoactive substances, and serving non-custodial sentences in the Probation Department of Klaipėda Regional Probation Service. It comments on the results of the behavioural correction programme Behaviour-Conversation-Change (BCC) applied to the individuals serving non-custodial sentences. The research was based on the quantitative research strategy. The participants of the research were individuals prone to criminal behavior, unrelated to the use of psychoactive substances, and serving non-custodial sentences in the Probation Department of Klaipėda Regional Probation Service. In the period from 2012 to 2017, 233 respondents took part in the research. The changes in the respondents' motivation were recorded by means of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA) 32-item measure, designed to evaluate four key components: precontemplation, contemplation, action, and maintenance (McConnaughy, Prochaska, Velicer, 1983). The changes were evaluated at the beginning and at the end of the programme. As proved by the findings, the impact of the Behaviour-Conversation-Change programme was positive at the precontemplation and the action stages. The results achieved in the application of the Behaviour-Conversation-Change programme meaningfully differed, given the officers' approach to the programme.Downloads
References
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormit, J. S. (2011). The Risk-Need-Responsity (RNR) Model Does Adding the Good Lives Model Contribute to Effective Crime Prevention ? Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol.7 (38), 735-755.
Austin, K. P., Williams, M. W. M., & Kilgour G. (2011). The Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing with Offenders: An Outcome Evaluation. New Zealand Journal of Psychology. Vol. 40, (1), 201.
Berger, R. (2016). Kriminalomsorgen: A Look at the World’s Most Humane Prison System in Norway. Access online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2883512
Burke, B. L., Arkowitz, H., & Menchola, M. (2003). The Efficacy of Motivational Interviewing: A Meta-Analysis of Controlled Clinical Trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 71 (5), 843-861.
Greswell, J. (2013). Research Design/Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Fourth Edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Hollin, C. R., & Palmer, E. J. (2006). Offending Behaviour Programmes. Development, Application, and Controversies.
Farbring, C.A. (2014). Handbok I motiverande samta. MI. Natur & Kultur.
Farbring, C.A., & Berge, P. (2004). Elgesys Pokalbis Pasikeitimas. Penki dalinai struktūruoti motyvuojantys pokalbiai. Programos vadovas, skirtas pataisos namams ir pataisos inspekcijoms. Vilnius: KDMC.
Figlie, N.B., Dunn, J., & Laranjeira, R. (2005). Motivation for change in alcohol dependent outpatients from Brazil. Addictive Behaviors, Vol. 30, 159-165.
Jucevičienė, P. (2013). Požiūris į ugdymą – edukacinės ir mokymosi aplinkos santykio konceptualusis pagrindas. In: Leonas Jovaiša: nuo pedagogikos edukologijos link. Sud. V. Aramavičiūtė. Vilnius: VUL.
Landenberger, N. A., & Lipsey, M. W. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive–behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, Vol. 1, 451–476.
Lietuvos Respublikos Statistikos departamento 2018 metų sausio 1 d. statistiniai duomenys. Access online: https://osp.stat.gov.lt/statistiniu-rodikliu-analize?theme=all#/) .
Lietuvos probacijos tarnybų registro 2018 metų sausio 1 d. duomenys. Access online: http://www.kaldep.lt/lt/kalejimu-departamentas/administracine_informacija/ataskaitos/metines.html
Lietuvos Respublikos Probacijos ĮSTATYMAS. (2011). Valstybės žinios, Nr. 4,108.
Kalėjimų departamento prie Lietuvos Respublikos teisingumo ministerijos direktoriaus įsakymas Nr. V-211 „Dėl nusikalstamo elgesio rizikos vertinimo metodikų ir elgesio pataisos programų aprobavimo Lietuvos bausmių vykdymo sistemoje tvarkos aprašo patvirtinimo ir adaptuotų nusikalstamo elgesio rizikos vertinimo metodikų ir elgesio pataisos programų aprobavimo“. Valstybės žinios, 2012, Nr. 72.
Lipsey, M. W., Landenberger, N. A., & Wilson, J. S. (2007). Effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for criminal offenders. Campbell Systematic Reviews.
Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation: A Review of Systematic Review. The Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 3, 297–320.
Lipsey, M. W., Landenberger, N. A. & Wilson, J. S. (2007). Effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for criminal offenders. Campbell Systematic Reviews.
Lizama, J., Matthews, V., & Reyes, S. (2014). What Works? Short-Term, In-Custody Treatment Programs. California State University Fullerton.
Lundahl, B., & Burke, B.L. (2009). The Effectiveness and Applicability of Motivational Interviewing: A Practice-Friendly Review of Four Meta-Analyses. Journal of Clinical Psychology: in Session, Vol. 65(11), 1232-1245.
McGuire, J. (2008). A review of effective interventions for reducing aggression and violence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences; 363(1503): 2577-2597, doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0035 .
McGuire, J. (2002). Motivation for what? Effective programmes for motivated offenders. In M. McMurran (Ed.), Motivating Offenders to Change: A Guide to Enhancing Engagement in Therapy (p. 157-172). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
McConnaughy, E. A., Prochaska, J. O., & Velicer, W. F. (1983). Stages of change in psychotherapy: Measurement and sample profiles. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, Vol. 20, 368-375.
McMurran, M. (2009). Motivational Interviewing with Offenders. A Systematic Review /Legal and Criminological Psychology. Vol. 14, (1), 83-100.
Miller, W. R., Sovereign, R. G., & Krege, B. (1988). Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers: II. The Drinker’s Check-Up as apreventive intervention. Behavioural Psychotherapy, Vol. 16, 251-268.
Miller, W. R., Brown, J. M., Simpson, T. L., Handmaker, N. S., Bien, T. H., Luckie, L. F., et al. (1995). What works? A methodological analysis of the alcohol treatment outcome literature. In: R. K. Hester &W. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of alcoholism treatment approaches: Effective alternatives (2nd ed., p.12-44). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Miller, W.R., Rose, G.S. (2009). Toward a Theory of Motivational Interviewing. Am Psychology, Sep, Vol. 64(6), 527-537.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Moyers, T.B. (2003). What should be teaching? Using process analysis to guide training. Presentation under ICTAB-konferensen I Heldelberg, September.
Prochaska, J.O., & DiClemente, C.C. (1984). The transtheoretical approach: Crossing the traditional boundaries of therapy. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
Saarnio, P. (2000). Spelar socialarbetaren nago roll? Nordisk Sosialt Arbeid, N.1.
Ulgevik, T. (2016). Prisons as Welfare Institutions? Punishment and the Nordic Model. In: Yvonne Jewkes, Ben Crewe, Jamie Bennett (red.) Handbook on Prisons, Routhledge. Access online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2767985
Vaitkevičius, R., & Saudargienė, A. (2006). Statistika su SPSS psichologiniuose tyrimuose: mokomoji knyga. Vilnius: Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla.
Vasilaki, E.I., Steven, G., Hosier, S.G., Miles, W., & Cox W.M. (2006). The Efficacy of Motivational Interviewing as A Brief Intervention for Excessive Drinking: A meta-Analytic Review. Alcohol & Alcoholism. Vol. 41, (3), 328-335.
Vaske J., Galyen K., & Cullen T. F. (2011). Toward a Biosocial Theory of offender rehabilitation: Why does cognitive-behavioral therapy work? Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 39, 90–102.
Ward, T., & Maruna, Sh. (2007). Rehabilitation. Beyond the risk paradigm. New York: Routledge.
Ward, T., Yates, P M., & Willis, G. M. (2012). The Good Lives Model and the Risk Need Redponsivity model. A Critical Response to Andrews, Bonta and Wormith. Criminal Justuce and Behavior, Vol 1 (39), 94-110.
Wormith S. M., Althouse R., Simpson M., Reitzel L. R., Fagan T. J., & Morgan R. D. (2007). The Rehabilitation and Reintegration of Offenders: The Current Landscape and Some Future Directions for Correctional Psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 7(34), 879–892.
Žukauskienė, L., Viršilas, V., & Farbring, C.A. (2017). Opportunities of socio-educational assistance to individuals serving alternative to imprisonment sentences: the programme behaviour-conversation-change application analysis. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Volume III, 307-321.
