EPSS – METHOD AND TOOLS FOR IMPROVING THE COMPETENCE IN THE XXI CENTURY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3153Keywords:
EPSS, Learning management, Learning-by-doing, Problem based managementAbstract
The paper discusses the features and usability of Electronic Performance Support Systems (EPSS) in education and improving the competence of adults. It is a serious problem for enterprises to search for employees (definite period, employment of students) for work that requires the use of business software. Learning (training) in the performance of tasks in such environment is an investment (requires time and expense). EPSS have been designed as tools to reduce the number of hours of training involving a trainer (human). These systems are coached - supported by people who use business software in their work on an ongoing basis. In the research we present how to implement them and in which way their popularization can help in hiring people without special pre-preparation, and only with the basic computer skills.References
Achieving enterprise software "Success". Study of buyers and sellers of enterprise software. (2008). San Francisco: SandHill Group.
Batt, R., Doellgast, V. & Kwon, H. (2005). U.S. call center industry report 2004 national benchmarking report strategy, HR practices & performance (CAHRS Working Paper #05-06). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies.
Bielawski, L. & Metcalf, D.S. (2003). Blended Elearning: Integrating Knowledge, Performance, Support, and Online Learning. Amherst: HRD Press Inc.
Chang, Ch. (2004). The relationship between the performance and the perceived benefits of using an electronic performance support system (EPSS). Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(3), 343-364.
Clark, R. C. (1992). EPSS—look before you leap: Some cautions about applications of electronic performance support systems. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 31(5) May/June, 22–25.
Dąbrowski, M. (2008). Analiza pomiaru efektywności kosztowej procesów e-learningowych. E-mentor , 5 (27).
E-learning na nowo, http://www.kadry.abc.com.pl/czytaj/-/artykul/e-learning-na-nowo.
Farooq, M. & Khan, M. A. (2011). Impact of Training and Feedback on Employee Performance. Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, 5(1), 23-33.
Gal, E. & Nachmias, R., (2011). Implementing On-Line Learning and Performance Support Using an EPSS. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects Volume 7, 213-224.
Gery, G. (1995). Attributes and Behaviors of Performance-Centered Systems. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8 (1), 47-93.
Gery, G. (1991). Electronic Performance Support Systems: How and Why to Remake the Workplace through the Strategic Application of Technology. Boston: Weingarten Publications.
Gery, G. (1989). Training vs. Performance Support: Inadequate Training is Now Insufficient. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 51-71.
Gibbs, G. (1988). Learning by doing: a guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford: Further Education Unit, Oxford Polytechnic.
Hung-Wen, L. & Ching-Hsiang, L. (2006). The Role of Electronic Performance Systems in Improving Learning and Performance. A Managerial Perspective, International Journal of management (Poole), 23 (2), 632-639.
Hyla, M. (2007). Przewodnik po e-learningu. Kraków: ABC, Wolters Kluwer business.
Jarmołowicz, W. & Knapińska, M. (2014). Koszty i produktywność pracy w Polsce i Unii Europejskiej – elementy analizy porównawczej. Studia Ekonomiczne UE, 196, 9-20.
Kajrunajtys, D. Malik, G. & Gródek-Szostak, Z. (2017). Integracja systemów informatycznych – wnioski z badań pilotażowych. Zeszyt Naukowy WSEI w Krakowie, 13, 118-135.
Kolb, A. & Kolb, D. (2008). Experiential Learning Theory: A Dynamic, Holistic Approach to Management Learning, Education and Development (pp. 43). In: Armstrong, S.J. Fukami, C. (Eds.) Handbook of Management Learning, Education and Development. London: Sage Publication.
Kosieradzka, A. (2012). Zarządzanie produktywnością w przedsiębiorstwie, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck.
Kunasz, M. (2016). Wielkość przedsiębiorstwa a czynniki determinujące szanse na szkolenie w organizacji. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 3 (173), 121-139.
Lorenowicz, E., Koszel, M., Kocira, S. & Uziak, J. (2015). Changes in ICT use by polish students from life sciences university. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 17 – 123.
Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Mosher, B. (2010). Performance Support And Learning at the Moment of need, https://www.elearningguild.com/showfile.cfm?id=3923, (dostęp: 10.01.2018)
McManus, D.J. & Snyder, Ch.A. (2003). Knowledge Management: The Role of EPSS. Information Management, Vol. 12, Iss. 2.
Mrug, M. (2017). Szkolenie na 100 procent, http://kadry.infor.pl/kadry/hrm/szkolenia_i_rozwoj/635360,Szkolenie-na-100 procent.html, (dostęp 10.01.2018).
Od push do pull learningu, http://edu-trendy.pl/od_push_do_pull_learningu,36,p.html, (dostęp: 10.01.2018)
Olszynka, S. (2015). Rynek call i contact center w Polsce 2015. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo PMR.
Piętowska-Laska, R. (2012). Doskonalenie produktywności we współczesnych przedsiębiorstwach, Economy and Management, 2.
Rae, L. (2004). Ocena pracy szkoleniowca. Kraków: Oficyna Ekonomiczna.
Raybould, B. (2000). Performance Support Engineering: Building Performance-Centered Web-based Systems, Information Systems, and Knowledge Management Systems in the 21st Century. Performance Improvement, 39 (6).
Różański, A. (2012). Dobór szkoleń pracowniczych w małych i średnich przedsiębiorstwach - analiza zjawiska. E-mentor 5 (47).
van Schaik, P., Pearson, R., & Barker, P. (2002). Designing electronic performance support
systems to facilitate learning. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 39(4), 289–306.
Sultana, A., Irum, S., Ahmed, K. & Mehmood, N. (2012). Impact of training on employee performance: a study of telecommunication sector in Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4 (6).
Szeląg-Sikora, A. & Cupiał, M. (2015). Productivity of Farms in the Aspect of Various Activity Forms. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, Volume 7, 94–98.
Yakin I. & Yildirim, S. (2016). Evaluating an electronic performance support system for crime scene investigation units in Turkey. Information Development, 32(4).
Wolski, K. & Szymańska, M. (2013). Branże narażone na wysoką fluktuację kadr, http://www.rynekpracy.pl/artykul.php/typ.1/kategoria_glowna.8/wpis.646 (dostęp 10.01.2018).
Wierzbicka, W. (2013). Produktywność pracy przedsiębiorstw prywatnych w Polsce – ujęcie regionalne, ZN UPH w Siedlcach, Seria: Administracja i Zarządzanie, nr 97.
Winslow, C.D. & Bramer, W.L. (1994). FutureWork: Putting knowledge to work in the knowledge economy. New York: The Free Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
