TECHNOFERENCE, COUPLE’S RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION CORRELATION BETWEEN CONFLICT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES CHOICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2017vol1.2410Keywords:
relationship satisfaction, conflict management strategies, technoferenceAbstract
The aim of this scientific research article is to describe the satisfaction with pairs’ relationship and conflict management strategies choice correlation between technoference. Pairs’ relationship, their formation and long-term existence is influenced by different factors, however, important to prescribe their existence is both partners' satisfaction with them. Quality of the relationship depends on overall life satisfaction. Studies on satisfaction with the pairs relations have a tendency to grow, as evidenced by the number of research databases. For example, in 2015 the database APAPsychNet they are 32 studies, but by June 2016 already 20 studies of the relationship, which are studied more new aspects that are not so far been adequately studied. Studies have been conducted on the use of technology devices impact on pairs’ relationships satisfaction with the relationship (for example, Sidelinger, Avash,et.al., 2008, Coyne, et.al., 2011). Available sources is a study that analyzes satisfaction with the pairs’ relationships correlation with technoference (technical devices in use caused by disruption in the pairs mutual communication), which leads to the conclusion that in this perspective the topic has not yet been adequately studied (Coyne McDaniel, 2016). This study will be determined not only technoference correlation with the satisfaction of pairs relationship and conflict management strategies choice of partners, but will also explore what device causing the most disruption and whether there is technoference correlation with conflict management strategies.References
Barna Group. (2011). The family & technology report: How technology is helping families—And TECHNOFERENCE IN RELATIONSHIPS 95 where they need help. State of The Church & Family: 2011 Annual Report. Retreived from http://www.barna.org/store?p._shop.product_details&flypage_flypage.tpl&product_id_116&category
Ahlstrom, M., Lundberg, N., Zabriskie, R., Eggett, D., & Lindsay, G. (2012). Me, my spouse, and my avatar: The relationship between marital satisfaction and playing massively multiplayer online roleplaying games (MMORPGs). Journal of Leisure Research, 44, 1–22.
Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 964–980. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737 .2000.00964.x.
Brenner, J., & Smith, A. (2013). 72% of online adults are social networking site users. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http:// www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/social-networ king-sites/Findings.aspx.
Chesley, N. (2005). Blurring boundaries: Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress, and family satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1237–1248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00213.x.
Coyne, C. J., Thompson, R., & Palmer, C.S. (2002). Marital Quality, Coping With Conflict, Marital Complaints, and Affection in Couples With a Depressed Wife. Journal of Family Psychology 2002, Vol. 16, No. 1, 26–37 DOI: 10.1037//0893-3200.16.1.26.
Coyne, S. M., & McDaniel, T., B. (2016) “Technoference”: The Interference of Technology in Couple Relationships and Implications for Women’s Personal and Relational Well-Being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture 2016, Vol. 5, No. 1, 85–98 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065.
Coyne, S. M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D. M. (2011). “I luv u:)!”: A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary. Journal of Applied Family Studies, 60, 150–162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010 .00639.x.
Dietmar, C. (2005). Mobile communication in couple relationships. In K. Nyiri (Ed.), A sense of place: The global and the local in mobile communication (pp. 201–208). Vienna, Austria: Passagen Verlag.
Elphinston, R. A., & Noller, P. (2011). Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 631–635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber .2010.0318.
Gentile, D. A., Coyne, S. M., & Bricolo, F. (2013). Pathological technology addictions: What is scientifically known and what remains to be learned. In K. Dill (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Media Psychology (pp. 382–402). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398809.013.0022.
Glenn, N. D., & Weaver, C. N. (1981). The contribution of marital happiness to global happiness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 161–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351426.
Hendrick, S. S., Hendrick, C., & Adler, N. L. (1988). Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of Personality.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Lang, K. R. (2005). Managing the paradoxes of mobile technology. Information Systems Management, 22, 7–23. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1201/1078.10580530/45520.22.4.20050901/90026.2.
Kovaļovs, S. (1990). Ģimenes attiecību psiholoģija. Rīga: “Zvaigzne”.
Krasta, E. (2015). Piedošanas motivācijas saistība ar laulāto apmierinātību ar attiecībām. RPIVA, nepublicēts kursa darbs
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Kickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http:// pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Teens-and socialmedia/ Part-1/Social-network-sites.aspx pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Teens-and-socialmedia/Part-1/Social-network-sites.aspx.
Mazmanian, M. A., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2005). Crackberries: The social implications of ubiquitous wireless e-mail devices. In C. Sørensen, Y. Yoo, K. Lyytinen, & J. DeGross (Eds.), Designing ubiquitous information environments: Socio-technical issues and challenges (pp. 337–343). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1007/0-387-28918-6_25.
Middleton, C. A., & Cukier, W. (2006). Is mobile email functional or dysfunctional? Two perspectives on mobile email usage. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 252–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000614.
Omarova S. (2006). Cilvēks runā ar cilvēku. Kamene. 130 lpp.
Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., & Raita, E. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16, 105–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0412-2.
Pettigrew, J. (2009). Text messaging and connectedness within close interpersonal relationships. Marriage and Family Review, 45, 697–716. http://dx .doi.org/10.1080/01494920903224269.
Rainie, L., & Keeter, S. (2006). Americans and their cell phones. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/ 2006/Americans-and-their-cell-phones.aspx.
Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x.
Schnurr, P.M., Mahatmya, D., Basche, A. R. (2013). Marital Quality, Coping With Conflict, Marital Complaints, and Affection in Couples With a Depressed. Wife Psychology of Violence 2013, Vol. 3, No. 1, 70–83 DOI: 10.1037/a0030601
Sidelinger, R. J., Ayash, G., Godorhazy, A., & Tibbles, D. (2008). Couples go online: Relational maintenance behaviors and relational characteristics use in dating relationships. Human Communication, 11, 341–355.
Smith, A. (2010). Home Broadband 2010. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/Home- Broadband-2010.aspx.
Smith, A. (2013). Smartphone ownership 2013. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Smart phone-Ownership-2013/Findings.aspx.
Thomas, T.W. & Kilmann, R.H. (2008). Conflict Mode Instrument, CPP, Inc. | 800-624-1765 | www.cpp.com
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
