OPPORTUNITIES OF SOCIO-EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO INDIVIDUALS SERVING ALTERNATIVE TO IMPRISONMENT SENTENCES: THE PROGRAMME BEHAVIOUR-CONVERSATIONCHANGE APPLICATION ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2017vol3.2263Keywords:
Socio-educational assistance, individuals with alcohol addicts serving non-custodial sentences, the behavioural correction programme Behaviour-Conversation-Change (BCC), motivational interviewAbstract
The paper focuses on the issue of socio-educational assistance to alcohol addicts serving non-custodial sentences in the Probation Department of Klaipėda Regional Probation Service. It comments on the results of the behavioural correction programme Behaviour-Conversation-Change (BCC), applied to the individuals serving non-custodial sentences. The research was based on the qualitative research strategy. The conducting of the research was underpinned by the works of W.R. Miller, S.Rollnick (1991, 2002) and numerous other authors on a motivational interview, as well as on a motivational interview-based programme Behaviour-Conversation-Change to be used by the penal system institutions (Farbring, Berge, 2004). The participants of the research were individuals with alcohol addicts, serving non-custodial sentences in the Probation Department of Klaipėda Regional Probation Service. In the period 2012 to 2017, 160 respondents took part in the research (accordingly, the sample was 151 respondents). The changes in the respondents' behaviour were recorded by means of the SOCRATES 8A 19 question- scale (The Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale), designed to evaluate three key components: problem recognition, ambivalence, and the steps taken (Miller, Tonigan, 1996). The changes were evaluated at the beginning and at the end of the Behaviour-Conversation-Change programme. As proved by the findings, the impact of the Behaviour-Conversation-Change programme was positive at the recognition and the step taking stages. The results achieved in the application of the Behaviour-Conversation-Change programme meaningfully differed, given the officers approach to the programme.Downloads
References
Austin, K. P., Williams, M. W. M., Kilgour, G. (2011). The Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing with Offenders: An Outcome Evaluation. New Zealand Journal of Psychology. Vol. 40, No. 1 (p.201)
Anstiss, B., Polaschek, D.L.L., Wilson, M. (2011). A brief motivational interviewing intervention with prisoners: when you lead a horse to water, can it drink for itself? Psychology, Crime & Law , Vol. 17 (p.689-710).
Bekarija, Č. (1992). Apie nusikaltimus ir bausmes. Vilnius: Mintis.
Burke, B. L., Arkowitz H., Menchola M. (2003). The Efficacy of Motivational Interviewing: A Meta-Analysis of Controlled Clinical Trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 71, No. 5 (p.843-861)
Chui, W. H., Nellis, M. (2003). Moving Probation Forward. Evidence, Arguments and Practice. London: Person Longman.
Farbring, C.A., Berge, P. (2004). Elgesys Pokalbis Pasikeitimas. Penki dalinai struktūruoti motyvuojantys pokalbiai. Programos vadovas, skirtas pataisos namams ir pataisos inspekcijoms. Vilnius: KDMC.
Kalėjimų departamento prie Lietuvos Respublikos teisingumo ministerijos direktoriaus įsakymas Nr. V-211 „Dėl nusikalstamo elgesio rizikos vertinimo metodikų ir elgesio pataisos programų aprobavimo Lietuvos bausmių vykdymo sistemoje tvarkos aprašo patvirtinimo ir adaptuotų nusikalstamo elgesio rizikos vertinimo metodikų ir elgesio pataisos programų aprobavimo. Valstybės žinios, 2012, Nr. 72.
Europos Tarybos Ministrų Komiteto rekomendacija (1999) Nr. (99) 22 „Dėl kalėjimų perpildymo bei kalėjimų populiacijos padidėjimo“ [žiūrėta 2016-09-08]. Prieiga per internetą: http://kdmc.lt/Teises aktai/
Farbring, C.A. (2014). Handbok I motiverande samta. MI. Natur & Kultur.
Farrington, D. P. (2003). Early prevention of Adult Antisocial Behaviuor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Figlie, N.B., Dunn, J., Laranjeira, R. (2005). Motivation for change in alcohol dependent outpatients from Brazil. Addictive Behaviors, No, 30 (p. 159-165).
Creswell, J. 2013. Research Design/ Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Fourth Edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications
Howells, K, Day, A. 2007. Readiness for treatment in high risk offenders with personality disorders. Psychology, Crime & Law , Vol.13 (p. 47-56).
Jungtinių Tautų Generalinės Asamblėjos rezoliucija (1990) Nr. 45/110 „Standartinės minimalios Jungtinių Tautų Organizacijos taisyklės dėl priemonių, nesusijusių su laisvės atėmimu (Tokijo taisyklės)“. [žiūrėta 2016-12-08]. Prieiga per internetą: http://kdmc.lt/Teises aktai/
Lipsey, M. W., Wilson, D. B., Cothern, L. (2000). Effective Intervention for Seriuos juvenile Offenders. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Office of Justice programs. Washington. [Žiūrėta 2016-12-09]. Prieiga per internetą: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/181201. pdf
Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės nutarimas Nr. 220 „Dėl Probacijos sistemos Lietuvoje koncepcijos ir probacijos sistemos Lietuvoje koncepcijos įgyvendinimo priemonių plano patvirtinimo“ (2007). Valstybės žinios, Nr. 27-989Lundahl, B., Burke, B.L. (2009). The Effectiveness and Applicability of Motivational Interviewing: A Practice-Friendly Review of Four Meta-Analyses. Journal of Clinical Psychology: in Session, Vol. 65(11), (1232-1245)
Maslow, A.H. (2009). Motyvacija ir asmenybė. Vilnius: Apostrofa.
McMurran, M. (2009). Motivational Interviewing with Offenders. A Systematic Review /Legal and Criminological Psychology. Vol. 14, Issue:1 (p. 83-100)
Miller, W.R., Rose, G.S. (2009). Toward a Theory of Motivational Interviewing. Am Psychology, Sep; 64(6) (527-537).
Miller, W. R., Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Miller, W. R., Brown, J. M., Simpson, T. L., Handmaker, N. S., Bien, T. H., Luckie, L. F., et al. (1995). What works? A methodological analysis of the alcohol treatment outcome literature. In: R. K. Hester & W. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of alcoholism treatment approaches: Effective alternatives (2nd ed., pp. 12-44). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Miller, W. R., Rollnick, S. (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
Miller, W. R., Sovereign, R. G., & Krege, B. (1988). Motivational interviewing with problem drinkers: II. The Drinker’s Check-Up as apreventive intervention. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 16 (251-268).
Miller, W. R., Tonigan, J. S. (1996). Assessing drinkers' motivation for change: The Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eagerness Scale (SOCRATES). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, Vol 10(2).
Moyers, T.B. (2003). What should be teaching? Using process analysis to guide training. Presentation under ICTAB-konferensen I Heldelberg, September 2003.
Prochaska, J.O., DiClemente, C.C. (1984). The transtheoretical approach: Crossing the traditional boundaries of therapy. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
Sherman L., Farrington D. at al. (2006). Evidence-based crime prevention. N-Y. Rutledge.
Scott T., Clark M.D., Gingerich R., Meltzer M.L. (2007). Guide for Probation and Parole: Motivating Offenders to Change. United States of America. Department of JusticeNational Institute of Corrections NiC Accession, Number 022253.
Rugevičius, M., Žukauskienė, L., Viršilas, V. (2008). Alternatyvią laisvės atėmimui bausmę atliekančių jaunuolių elgesio ir emocijų sunkumų vertinimo galimybės. Ugdymo psichologija, Nr.19 (p. 50-58).
Vasilaki, E.I., Steven, G., Hosier, S.G., W.Miles Cox, W.M. (2006). The Efficacy of Motivational Interviewing as A Brief Intervention for Excessive Drinking: A meta-Analytic Review. Alcohol & Alcoholism. Vol. 41, No 3 (p. 328-335).
Vaitkevičius, R., Saudargienė, A. (2006). Statistika su SPSS psichologiniuose tyrimuose. Kaunas: VDU leidykla.
Žukauskienė, L. Viršilas, V. (2013). Socioedukacinė pagalba 14-16 metų paaugliams, atliekantiems laisvės atėmimui alternatyvią bausmę. Tiltai, Nr. 2(63) (p. 95-113).
