NECESSITY OF MAPPING AND ASSESSMENT OF ECOSYSTEMS AND THEIR SERVICES IN PLANNING AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2016vol4.1573Keywords:
ecosystem services, ecosystem services assessment, land use planning and management, decision makingAbstract
The EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 determines that “Member States, with the assistance of the Commission, will map and assess the state of ecosystems and their services in their national territory by 2014, assess the economic value of such services, and promote the integration of these values into accounting and reporting systems at EU and national level by 2020”. Mapping and assessment of ecosystem services provides several benefits, one of which is baseline data providing to measure net future gains or losses and data integration into spatial development process.
The aim of the paper is to present and discuss the approach taken to assessing ecosystem services in order to introduce necessity of mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services for planning and decision-making process in Latvia. The paper will focus on terminology interpretation of ecosystem services, introducing with set of developed indicators for assessment of ecosystem services and define appropriate for Latvia. The paper closes with estimation of potential benefits and necessity to integrate assessment of ecosystems services in spatial planning and decision-making process.
References
Bagstad, K. J., Semmens, D. J., Waage, S., Winthrop, R. (2013). A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosystem Services 5:27-39.
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., Müller, F. (2012): Mapping supply, demand and budgets of ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators 21, 17-29.
Daily, G.C., Polasky, S., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., Mooney, H.A., Pejchar, L., Ricketts, T.H., Salzman, J., Shallenberger, R. (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(1), 21–28
European Commission, (2011). Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. COM(2011) 244, Brussels.
Fitter, A., Elmqvist, T., Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., Rinaldo, A., Setala, H., Stoll-Kleemann, S., Zobel, S.M., Murlis, J. (2010). An assessment of ecosystem servicesand biodiversity in Europe. Issues of Environmental Science and Technology, 30, 1–28.
Förster, J., Barkmann, J., Fricke, R., Hotes, S., Kleyer, M., Kobbe, S., Kübler, D., Rumbaur, C., Siegmund-Schultze, M., Seppelt, R., Settele, J., Spangenberg, J.H., Tekken, V., Václavík, T., Wittmer, H. (2015). Assessing ecosystem services for informing land-use decisions: a problem-oriented approach. Ecology and Society 20 (3), 31
De Groot, R.S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making Ecological Complexity, 7, 260–272
Healey, P. (2007). Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies. Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times. Routledge, London and New York.
Jacobs S., Burkhard, B., Van Daele, T., Staes, J., Schneiders, A., (2015) ‘The Matrix Reloaded’ – A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, 295, 21-30
Labiosa, W.B., Forney, W.M., Esnard, A.M., Mitsova-Boneva, D., Bernknopf , R., Hearn, P., Hogan, D., Pearlstine, L., Strong e, D., Gladwin, H., and Swain, E. (2013). An integrated multi-criteria scenario evaluation web tool for participatory land-use planning in urbanized areas: The Ecosystem Portfolio Model. Environmental Modelling & Software, 41, pp.210-222
MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
Maes, J., Egoh, B., Willemen, L., Liquete, C., Vihervaara, P., Schägner, J.P., Grizzetti, B., Drakou, E.G., LaNotte, A., Zulian, G., Bouraoui, F., Paracchini, M.L., Braat, L., Bidoglio, G., (2012). Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decisionmaking in the European Union. Ecosystem Services, 1, 31–39.
Saeima of the Republic of Latvia (2010). Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 2030, Riga
Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. (2012). National Development Plan of Latvia for 2014–2020, Riga
Scholz, R.W. (2011). Environmental Literacy in Science and Society: From Knowledge to Decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Seppelt, R., Dormann, C.F., Eppink, F.V., Lautenbach, S., Schmidt, S. (2011). A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48 (3), 630–636.
Tansley, A.G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetation terms and concepts. Ecology 16 (3), 284–307.
TEEB, (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB.
Terrado, M., Acuna, V., Ennaanay, D., Tallis, H., Sabater, S., 2014. Impact of climateextremes on hydrological ecosystem services in a heavily humanized Mediter-ranean basin. Ecological Indicators, 37, 199–209.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
