ECOLOGICAL APPROACH IN YOUTH EDUCATION IN THE FIELD OF NATIONAL DEFENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/er2022.1.6801Keywords:
ecological approach, national defence training, national sustainable development, youth education environmentAbstract
The current geopolitical situation in the world, and especially in Europe, highlights the sustainability of each society and country in the present dimension and sustainable development in the future. The ability of the society of the future to develop itself, to provide for the sovereignty of its country, to strengthen its economy, to raise its level of prosperity, to preserve and enrich its culture is shaped and developed in today's schools and universities as the next generations are learning and studying there. They will be managing the country in the future, taking care of sustainable development of the society, the economy of their country, its security and defence, being at the heart of our country's future society. Therefore, innovations in the content of general secondary education in Latvia are needed by introducing a new subject of National Defence Training in schools. The legal basis for this has already been prepared in the form of laws and other regulations. Model curricula for general secondary education and the Youth Guard have been developed. Since in global forums as well as in scientific publications at the end of the 20th century the ecological paradigm has been justified as a transdisciplinary paradigm, but the ecological approach in human thinking, in promoting the development of children/youth, in all kinds of activities (in all areas of human activity, including education) has been justified as an imperative, which has become more and more relevant in the 21st century, the aim of the research was to substantiate the diversity of ecological approaches in the education of young people in the field of national defence. The results of the research demonstrate that the ecological approach is visible in the development of the national defence content. It is also common in the justification for the many aspects of the national defence learning environment.
References
Baltušīte, R. (2012). Pedagoģijas studentu gatavība profesionālai darbībai skolas vidē (Preparedness of pedagogy students for professional activity in the school environment). Promocijas darbs. Jelgava: LLU.
Baltušīte, R., & Katane, I. (2014). The Structural Model of the Pedagogy Students’ Readiness for Professional Activities in the Educational Environment. Rural Environment. Education. Personality. 7, pp. 29 - 41. Jelgava: LLU. Retrieved from http://llufb.llu.lv/conference/REEP/2014/Latvia-Univ-Agricult-REEP-2014proceedings.pdf
Barnes, P., & Sharp, B. (Red.). (2004). Outdoor Education. Lyme Regis: Russel House Publishing Ltd.
Berzina, I. (2020). From ‘total’ to ‘comprehensive’ national defence: the development of the concept in Europe. Journal on Baltic Security, 6(2), 7-15. doi:10.2478/jobs-2020-0006
Bērziņa, I., Kuzmins, V., Falka, S., Gūtmane, U., & Damberga, J. (2020). Valsts aizsardzības mācība: Specializētā kursa programmas paraugs vispārējai vidējai izglītībai (National Defence Training: Sample specialized course program for general secondary education). Rīga: Jaunsardzes centrs, VISC, AM.
Bonnedahl, K., Heikkueinen, P., & Paavola, J. (2022). Strongly sustainable development goals: Overcoming distances constraining responsible action. Environmental Science & Policy, 129, 150-158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.004
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1996). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bruntland, G. (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford Universitu Press. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
Closs, L., Mahat, M., & Imms, W. (2021). Learning environments' influence on students' learning experience in an Australian Faculty of Business and Economics. Learn Environment. doi:10.1007/s10984-021-09361-2
Devall, B. (1980). The deep ecology movement 299-322. Natural Resources Journal, 20, 299-322.
European Commission. (2000). A Memorandum on Lifelong Learning. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities. Retrieved from https://arhiv.acs.si/dokumenti/ Memorandum_on_Lifelong_Learning.pdf
European Commission. (2021). Sustainable Development in European Union. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/ detail/en/STATEMENT_21_3006
Frankl, V. (1992). Man’s Search for Meaning. Boston: MA: Beacon Press.
Frankl, V. (2000). Recollections: An Autobiography. New York: Perseus Books.
Galinec, D., Možnik, D., & Guberina, B. (2017). Cybersecurity and cyber defence: national level strategic approach. Automatika: Journal for Control, Measurement, Electronics, Computing and Communications, 58 (3), 273-286. doi:10.1080/00051144.2017.1407022
Grishina, N., & Kostromina, S. (Red.). (2020). Zhiznennoe prostranstvo v psihologii: Teorija i fenomenologija (Living space in psychology: Theory and phenomenology). Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel'stvo Sant-Peterburgskogo universiteta.
Hajlan, M., & Kashani, S. (2021). Evolution of the concept of sustainability. From Brundtland Report to sustainable development goals. Sustainable Resource Management: Modern Approaches and Contexts, 1-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824342-8.00018-3
Hiemstra, R. (Ed.). (1991). Creating Environments for Effective Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Huitt, W. (2012). A systems approach to the study of human behavior: Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta: Valdosta State University. Retrieved from http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/materials/sysmdlo.html
Hungerford, H. (2009). Environmental Education (EE) for the 21st Century: Where Have We Been? Where Are We Now? Where Are We Headed? The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(1), 1-6. doi:10.1080/00958960903206773
Indoor and outdoor environments that support child and adult learning and maximize communicatio. (2022). Retrieved from FirstSchool Home: Child Development Institute: https://firstschool.fpg.unc.edu/indoor-and-outdoor-environments-support-child-and-adult-learning-and-maximize-communication.html
Jung, K. (2017). Problemy dushi nashego vremeni (Problems of the soul of our time). Sankt - Peterburg: Piter.
Karpova, Ā. (1998). Personība. Teorijas un to radītāji (Personality. Theories and their creators). Rīga: Zvaigzne ABC.
Katane, I. (2007). No ekoloģiskās paradigmas līdz vides modelim izglītības pētniecībā (From the ecological paradigm to the environmental model in educational research). Sērija „Izglītības ekoloģija”. Jelgava: LLU.
Katane, I., & Katans, E. (2014). Multidimensional Model of Distance Learning Environment. In V. Ļubkina, & G. Marzano (Ed.), Society. Integration. Education. 2, pp. 106 - 115. Rezekne: RA. doi:https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2014vol2.667
Katane, I., & Pēks, L. (2006). Izglītības ekoloģija: starpdisciplinārs virziens mūsdienu izglītības pētniecībā (Educational ecology: an interdisciplinary direction in modern educational research). Jelgava: LLU.
Kreija-Gaikste, S., & Katane, I. (2021). Multidimensional and Multifunctional Content of National Defence Training in Latvian Schools. Research for Rural Development. 36, pp. 337-343. Jelgava: Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technology. doi:10.22616/rrd.27.2021.048
Kukuļinskis, G. (Red.). (2021). Valsts aizsardzības mācība: Specializētā kursa programmas paraugs (National Defence Training: Sample specialized course program). Rīga: VISC, AM. Ielādēts no https://www.jc.gov.lv/sites/jic/files/document/VAM_ programma_2021.pdf
LR Aizsardzības ministrija. (2021). Valdība apstiprina ziņojumu par valsts aizsardzības mācības ieviešanas rezultātiem un uzlabojumiem Jaunsardzē (The government approves a report on the results of the implementation of national defence training and improvements in the Youth Guard). Ielādēts no Aizsardzības ministrija: https://www.mod.gov.lv/lv/zinas/valdiba-apstiprina-zinojumu-par-valsts-aizsardzibas-macibas-ieviesanas-rezultatiem-un
LR Aizsardzības ministrija. (2020). Valsts aizsardzības koncepcija (National Defence Concept). Ielādēts no Aizsardzības ministrija: https://www.mod.gov.lv/ sites/mod/files/document/AiMVAK_2020_projekts.pdf
LR Aizsardzības ministrija. (2022). Valsts aizsardzības mācība (National Defence Training). Ielādēts no Aizsardzības ministrija: https://www.mod.gov.lv/lv/nozares-politika/ visaptverosa-valsts-aizsardziba/sabiedribas-izglitosana/valsts-aizsardzibas-maciba
LR Ministru kabinets. (2018a). Par Nacionālās identitātes, pilsoniskās sabiedrības un integrācijas politikas īstenošanas plānu 2019.-2020. gadam (On the National Identity, Civil Society and Integration Policy Implementation Plan for 2019-2020). Ministru kabineta rīkojums Nr. 345. Ielādēts no Likumi.lv: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/300483-par-nacionalas-identitates-pilsoniskas-sabiedribas-un-integracijas-politikas-istenosanas-planu-2019-2020-gadam.
LR Ministru kabinets. (2018b). Par valsts aizsardzības mācības ieviešanu un Jaunsardzes attīstību 2019.–2027: Informatīvais ziņojums (On the Introduction of National Defence Training and the Development of the Youth Guard in 2019–2027: Information statement). Ielādēts no Latvijas Republikas Ministru kabineta tiesību aktu projekti: http://tap.mk.gov.lv/mk/tap/?pid=40467754
LR Saeima. (2019). Nacionālās drošības koncepcija (The Concept of National Security). Ielādēts no https://likumi.lv/ta/id/309647-par-nacionalas-drosibas-koncepcijas-apstiprinasanu
LR Saeima. (2020a). Par Valsts aizsardzības koncepcijas apstiprināšanu: Saeimas paziņojums (On approval of the National Defence Concept: Statement of the Saeima). Ielādēts no Likumi.lv: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/317591-par-valsts-aizsardzibas-koncepcijas-apstiprinasanu
LR Saeima. (2020b). Valsts aizsardzības mācības un Jaunsardzes likums (Law on the National Defence Training and the Youth Guard). Ielādēts no Likumi.lv: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/319794-valsts-aizsardzibas-macibas-un-jaunsardzes-likums
Margeviča-Grinberga, I., & Šūmane, I. (2020). Mūsdienu mācību vide skolēnu aktīvai iesaistīšanai mācību procesā (Modern learning environment for active involvement of students in the learning process). Rīga: LU. Ielādēts no https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/bitstream/handle/7/54423/margevica_grinberga_ieva-sumane_ilze-muzdieniga_macibu_vide_skolenu_aktivai_iesaistisanai_mac_procesa-book.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Mattis, J., & Hoffman, F. (2005). Future Warfare: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Proceedings of the U.S. Naval Institute . Retrieved from https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/ 2005/november/future-warfare-rise-hybrid-wars
Messerli, P., & Murniningtyas, E. (Eds.). (2019). The Future is Now: Science for Achieving Sustainable Development: Global Sustainable Development Report. New York: United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/24797GSDR_report_2019.pdf
Mitranić, N., Miskeljin, L., & Breneselovic, D. (2019). Education for Sustainable Development and Preschool Teachers’ Competencies. In V. Lovren, J. Peeters, & N. Matović (Eds.), Quality of Education: Global Development Goals and Local Strategies (pp. 63-82). Belgrade: University of Belgrade. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335243915_Education_for_Sustainable_Development_and_Preschool_Teachers'_Competencies
Mjasishhev, V. (2022). Psihologija otnoshenij (Relationship psychology). Polucheno iz http://web.krao.kg/10_psihologia/0_pdf/10.pdf
Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. In quiry, 16, 95-100. Retrieved from https://iseethics.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/naess-arne-the-shallow-and-the-deep-long-range-ecology-movement.pdf
Neda Afshar, F., & Barrie, A. (2021). The Significance of Outdoor Learning Environments in Innovative Learning Environments. P. Boarin, E. Haarhoff, M. Manfredini, M. Mohammadzadeh, & A. Premier (Red.), APRU 2020 Sustainable Cities and Landscapes Conference. doi:10.17608/k6.auckland.13578134.v2
Palmer, J., & Neal, P. (2004). The handbook of Environmental Education. New York: Routledge.
Prasad, M. (2019). Relevance of the Sustainable Development Concept for International Space Law: An Analysis. Space Policy, 47, 166-174.
Radcliffe, D. (2008). A pedagogy-space-technology (PST) framework for designing and evaluating learning places. Retrieved from https://www.ntnu.edu/documents/ 1283650518/1283655368/A+Pedagogy-Space-+Technology+%28PST%29+Framework+for+Designing+and+Evaluating+Learning+Places/2852951b-7784-49cb-877f-aa4e860740fb
Reņģe, V. (2002). Sociālā psiholoģija (Social psychology). Rīga: Zvaigzne ABC.
Sessions, G. (1995). Deep Ecology for the 21st Century. Boston: Shambhala Publications.
Shtejnbah, H., & Elenskij, V. (2004). Psihologija zhiznennogo prostranstva (Living space psychology). Sankt-Peterburg: Rech'.
Sinakou, E., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Exploring the concept of sustainable development within education for sustainable development: implications for ESD research and practice. Environment Development and Sustainability, 21(3), 1-10. doi:10.1007/s10668-017-0032-8
Sinakou, E., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Goossens, M., & Van Petegem, P. (2018). Academics in the field of Education for Sustainable Development: Their conceptions of sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 321-332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.279
Sterling, S. (1992). Coming of Age: a short history of environmental education (to 1989). Walsall: National Association for Environmental Education.
Špona, A. (2004). Audzināšanas process teorijā un praksē (Upbringing process in theory and practice). Rīga: RaKa.
UNESCO. (2012). Education for Sustainable Development. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/926unesco9.pdf
Vygotskij, L. (2000). Psihologija (Psychology). Serija: Mir psihologii. Moskva: JeKSMO-Press.
Žogla, I. (2001). Didaktikas teorētiskie pamati (Theoretical bases of didactics). Rīga: RaKa.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
