THE INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF LEADERSHIP, MOTIVATION AND JOB ENGAGEMENT

Ilga Prudņikova, Varis Prudņikovs

Abstract


The purpose of the research is to investigate the relationship between the leadership and job engagement. The study is built on research activities and there are used both theoretical and empirical methods. Qualitative and quantitative methods in the form of questionnaires are used during the study. Transformational leadership is the independent variable in this study and the instrument used to measure leadership is the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (Bass & Avolio, 1997). Questionnaire A Great Place To Work – What Makes Some Employers So Good And Most So Bad? (Bakingems & Kofmans, 2005) as an instrument has been used to explain what makes a company a good place to work and offers specific strategies for fostering a positive work environment and the instrument used to. The statistical programme used for the analyses and presentation of data in this research is the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23. In conclusion: transformational leadership is more likely to increase the levels of job engagement as opposed to transactional leadership, the results from this study support interesting directions for future research.

 


Keywords


extrinsic motivation; intrinsic motivation; job engagement; leader; leadership styles

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alimo-Metcalfe, R., & Alban-Metcalfe, R. J. (2002). Leadership. In: Warr P.(Eds.) Psychology at Work (300 – 325). London: PenguinBooks.

Amabile, T.M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do. California Management Review, 40, 46 – 54.

Bakingems, M., & Kofmans, K. (2005). Vispirms pārkāpt visus likumus. Ko pasaules izcilākie menedžeri dara citādi. Jelgava: Izdevniecības nams TRĪS.

Bass, B.M. (1997). Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2), 130-139. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.2.130

Bass, B.M. (1998). Transformational Leadership: Lawrence erlbaum. New Jersey, Mahwah.

Bass, B.M., & Avolio, B.J. (1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership. CA: Sage Publications.

Bass, B.M., & Avolio, B.J. (1997). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Retrieved from: http://alrestivo.com/Downloads_files/Multifactor%20Leadership%20Questionnaire.pdf

Bass, B.M., &Avolio, B.J. (1990). The Implication of Transactional and Transformational Leadership for Individual, Teams, and Organizational Development. Research in Organizational Behavior, 4, 231-272.

Clawson, J.G. (2008). Leadership Theories. Virginia: Darden Business Publishing.

Fiedler, F.E. (1967). A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hillman, A.J., Nicholson, G., & Shropshire,C. (2008). Directors’ multiple identities, identification, and board monitoring and resource provision, Organization Science, 19, 3, 441–456.

Judge, T.A., Heller, D., & Mount, M.K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A metaanalysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3, 530– 541.

Judge, T.A., & Church, A.H., (2000). Job satisfaction. In Cooper, C., & Locke, E. A. (Eds.): Industrial and organizational psychology: Linking theory with practice (166-198). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Kreiner, G.E., Hollensbe, E.C., & Sheep, M.L., (2006). Where is the “me” among the “we”? Identity work and the search for optimal balance, Academy of Management Journal, 49, 5, 1031–1057.

Levering, R. (1998). A Great Place to Work – What Makes Some Employers So Good and Most So Bad? New York, Avon Books.

McCaffery, P. (2004). The Higher Education Manager’s Handbook. Effective Leadership and Management in Universities and Colleges. New York: Routledge, XII 322.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol6.5071

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.