BORDER CHECK TRAINING IN FINLAND - COMPARISON OF E-LEARNING TOOLS FOR PRACTICAL AND LEGAL STUDIES

Sari Lindblom-Häkkinen, Saila Heinikoski, Maisa Anttila

Abstract


The paper discusses the possibilities and challenges in applying e-learning tools in border check training, comparing the training of legal issues and border check practices. The main research question of the paper is how e-learning is utilised in and comport with border guard training. In pedagogical discussion, one of the most popular strands in the e-learning context is the method called "flipped classroom". In a flipped classroom, part of so-called blended learning, students study e-learning material before they start practicing their skills in simulated situations. We examine in which situations related to border checks flipped learning could be appropriate and beneficial and what sort of skills can best be learned through them. Practical skills are of course crucial, and after classroom learning in border guard training, working practice periods are obligatory for students. With the above-mentioned pedagogical concepts in mind, we first utilise content analysis based on the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework, analysing how the online platform supports practical skills. Secondly, we bring the training period into conversation highlighting its importance as a learning method. The empirical material of the paper consists of educational documents, e-learning material used in border check and legal training as well as interviews and observation with trainers and teachers at the Finnish Border and Coast Guard Academy. The paper illustrates that e-learning tools are particularly useful in rehearsing to apply theoretical knowledge in practical situations. Still, the training period cannot be replaced with any methods. However, basing on the tentative analysis of empirical data before training period, flipped learning method seems to be very effective learning method.

Keywords


border guard training; Community of Inquiry; constructive alignment; e-learning; flipped learning; mixed method; training period; blended learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arbaugh, J. et al. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 133-136.

Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped Learning: Gateway to Student Engagement. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.

Biggs, J. B. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning At University. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Border and Coast Guard Academy. (2018). Teacher's guide. Imatra: Raja- ja merivartiokoulu.

Border and Coast Guard Academy. (2017). Pedagogical strategy. Imatra: Raja- ja merivartiokoulu.

Cooper, T. & Scriven, T. (2017). Communities of inquiry in curriculum approach to online learning: Strengths and limitations in context. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 22-37.

Ent, V. (2016). Is Flipped Learning Really New to Academia? TechTrends, 60, 204-206.

Garrison, D. R. et al. (2010). The First Decade of the Community of Inquiry Framework: A Retrospective. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5-9.

Garrison, D. R. (2017). E-learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework for research and practice (Third edition.). New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Graham, M. et al. (2017). Flipping and still learning: experiences of a flipped classroom approach for a third-year undergraduate human geography course. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(3), 403-417.

Graneheim, U. H.; Lindgren, B.M. & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29-34.

Hew, K.F. & Cheng, W.S. (2014). Using Blended Learning: Evidence-Based Practices. Singapore: SpringerBriefs in Education.

Kirkwood, A. (2009). E-learning. You don't always get what you hope for. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18 (2), 107-121.

McCann, M. (2017). Constructive alignment in economics teaching: a reflection on effective implementation. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(3), 336-348.

Slomanson, W. (2014). Blended Learning: A Flipped Classroom Experiment. Journal of Legal Education, 64(1), 93-102.

Wass, H. (2011). Konstruktiivisesti linjakkaan opetuksen malli kurssin suunnittelussa: esimerkkinä kvantitatiivisten menetelmien opintojakso. Politiikka, 53(4), 285-294.

Vesterinen, M.-L. (2002). Ammatillinen harjoittelu osana asiantuntijuuden kehittymistä ammattikorkeakoulussa. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research.

Zhang, Y. et al. (2016). A Large-Scale Blended and Flipped Class: Class Design and Investigation of Factors Influencing Students’ Intention to Learn. IIEE Transactions on Education, 59 (4), 263-273.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3174

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.