THE METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF PEDAGOGICAL RESEARCH IN THE CONTEXT OF EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY

Authors

  • Zoja Chehlova Латвийский Университет (LV)
  • Mihails Chehlovs Высшая школа менеджмента информационных систем (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/ercs2016.2177

Keywords:

gnoseological approach, hypothesis, methodological foundations, object, subject

Abstract

The methodological foundations of pedagogical research still remain a debatable and under-researched scientific issue. In our view, this is due to the following reasons:-

- the lack of scientifically grounded understanding concerning the subject of pedagogy as a science;

- different interpretations of the content of the object and the subject of pedagogical research;

- denial of the inter-relationship of the object and the subject of pedagogical research;

- lack of understanding of the role of hypothesis as the scientific basis of pedagogical research, resulting in the exclusion of the hypothesis from pedagogical research and its replacement with a research question.

Different interpretations of the methodological foundations of pedagogical research and the resulting unproductive experiment determined the further study of this problem.The purpose of the article is the scientific interpretation of the methodological foundations of pedagogical research.Research Methodology – there were used the following approaches: the epistemological approach, the student- activity approach and the anthropological approach.Research method – theoretical analysis.

References

Chilcote, R.H., Johnson, D.L. (1983). Theories of Development: Mode of Production or Dependency? Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Čehlovs, M. (2011). Vidusskolēnu pašnoteikšanās attīstības humanitārie aspekti. Rīga: Raka.

Čehlova, Z. (2002). Izziņas aktivitāte mācībās. Rīga: Raka.

Greener, S (2012). Interactive learning environments? Interactive Learning Environments, Vol.20, No.2, 101.-102.

Milne, A. (2007). Entering the Interaction Age: Implementing a Future Vision for Campus Learning Spaces Today. EDUCAUSE Review, Vol.42, No.1, 2007, 12.-31.

Špona, A., Čehlova, Z. (2000). Pedagoģijas zinātnes priekšmeta būtība. Latvijas Zinātņu Akadēmijas Vēstis. Nr. 1./2.

Бест, Ф. (1989). Метаморфозы понятия «педагогика». Перспективы. Вопросы образования. №2, Юнеско.с. 7-13.

Даниэль, А., Моралес, Г. (1990). Поиск новых моделей: роль исследований. Перспективы. Вопросы образования. №2, Юнеско. 50-65.

Загвязинский В.И. (1982). Методология и методика дидактического исследования. Москва: Педагогика.

Карлос, Э.О. (1989). К теории сравнительной педагогики. Перспективы. Вопросы образования, №2. Юнеско. 15-29.

Нейматов, Я.М. (2002). Образование в ХХ веке. Москва: Алгоритм.

Непомнящая, Н.И. (1985). Методология целостного исследования в педагогике. Москва: Педагогика.

Сенько, Ю.В. (2000). Гуманитарные основы педагогического образования. Москва: Педагогика.

Скаткин, М.Н. (1986). Методология и методика педагогического исследования. Москва: Педагогика.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chehlova, Z., & Chehlovs, M. (2016). THE METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF PEDAGOGICAL RESEARCH IN THE CONTEXT OF EDUCATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY. Education Reform in Comprehensive School: Education Content Research and Implementation Problems, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.17770/ercs2016.2177