THE WILL OF THE PATIENT EXPRESSED IN ADVANCE AND ITS LEGAL CONSEQUENCES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/lner2015vol1.7.1185Keywords:
Establishment of the will, patient, will expressed in advance, registry of the willAbstract
The regulation of the will of the patient expressed in advance is controversial and insufficient in the Latvian legislation. The legal regulation on the will of the patient expressed in advance stipulates clearly only the form of the will of the patient; it has to be established without sufficient reference to its legally binding force. The aim of the research is to carry out a legal analysis of the institution of the patient’s will expressed in advance, to identify legal flaws related to it and to propose particular solutions to eliminate the identified limitations. To achieve the aim, the following research tasks are set: 1) to analyze the legal nature of the patient’s will expressed in advance; 2) to explore the content and term of the patient’s will expressed in advance; 3) to assess the establishment of the patient’s will expressed in advance and its termination. The following research methods are used in the research: semantic method, grammar method, historical method, analytical method, comparative method, systemic method, teleological method. In a result of the research the author has formulated the principles of the will of the patient expressed in advance that could be introduced in the legal regulation on the issue, thus improving the legal protection of the patient. Analysing the legal nature of the patient’s will expressed in advance and taking into account its peculiarity, the content boundaries of this particular type of the expression of the patient’s will were defined identifying the extent of the patient’s self-determination. Assessing various possibilities of choosing the term defining the patient’s will expressed in advance, the author has sustained the most appropriate version of the term considering both national and international legal regulation, and notions of the legal doctrine. Another issue of a similar significance that was analysed in the research were the methods used in the legal practice of the world countries to determine the patient’s will expressed in advance; the author has analysed and offered the determination method, which is the most appropriate for the legal system of Latvia. In the conclusion, types of termination of the patient’s will expressed in advance and their legal consequences were analysed. Furthermore, the author proposes an applicable project of the amendments to the legal regulations in order to implement the theoretical conclusions of the research related to the patient’s will expressed in advance into the legal system of Latvia.Downloads
References
BALODIS, K. (2007). Ievads Civiltiesibas [Introduction into Civil Rights]. Riga: Zvaigzne ABC, 383 p.
BOCKENHEIMER-LUCIUS, G. (2007).Behandlungsbegrenzung durch eine Patientenverfügung – im individuellen Fall auch mit Blick auf neue therapeutische Möglichkeiten! [Treatment Limitation by Patient’s Order - in the Individual Cases with Regards to New Therapeutic Possibilities!]. Ethik in der Medizin, Iss:1, p. 5-6.
BRAUER, S. (2008). Die Autonomiekonzeption in Patientenverfügungen – Die Rolle von Persönlichkeit und sozialen Beziehungen [The Conception of Autonomy in Patient’s Order - the Role of Personality and Social Relationships]. Ethik in der Medizin, Iss: 20, p.230 - 239.
Civil Law of Latvia. Fourth Part. Obligations Law (1993). LR Saeimas un Ministru Kabineta Zinotajs, 1993, No.1.
Civil Law of Latvia. Second Part. Inheritance Law (1992). LR Saeimas un Ministru Kabineta Zinotajs, 1992, No.29.
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine (1997). Retrieved March 11, 2015, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX: 62006C0500:LV:HTML.
ERNST, G. (2008). Patientenverfügung, Autonomie und Relativismus [ Patient’s Order, Autonomy and Relativism]. Ethik in der Medizin, Iss: 20, p.240 - 247.
Finland’s Act on the Status and Rights of Patients (1992). Retrieved Januar 3, 2015, from http://waml.haifa.ac.il/.
German Civil Code (1896). Retrieved March 11, 2015, from www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/englisch_bgb.html#BGBengl_000G1.
GIESEN, D. (1988). International Medical Malpractice Law: A Comparative Law Study of Civil Liability Arising from Medical Care. Tübingen, Boston, London: J.C.B. Mohr, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Health Act of Denmark (2005). Lovtidende A, 2005, No. 92.
HÖFLING, W. (2006). Gesetz zur Sicherung der Autonomie und Integrität von Patienten am Lebensende (Patientenautonomie- und Integritätsschutzgesetz) [Act to Ensure the Autonomy and Integrity of Patients at the End of their Life (Patient’s Will and Integrity Protection Act)]. MedR, Iss: 1, p.25 - 32.
Law on the Protection of the Body of Deceased Human Beings and the Use of Human Tissues and Organs in Medicine, the Republic of Latvia (1993). LR Saeimas un Ministru Kabineta Zinotajs, 1993, No.1.
Law on the Rights of Patient of Georgia (2000). Retrieved March 11, 2015, from http://aitel.hist.no/~walterk/wkeim/files/Georgia_Patients_Rights_Law.htm.
Law on the Rights of Patients of Latvia (2009). Latvijas Vestnesis, 2009, No.205.
MONA, M. (2008). Wille oder Indiz für mutmaßlichen Willen? [Will or Indication of Presumed Will?]. Ethik in der Medizin, Iss: 3, p.248 - 257.
Notariate Law of Latvia (1993). LR Saeimas un Ministru Kabineta Zinotajs, 1993, No.26/27.
Österreichs Patientencharta [Austria Patients' Charter] (2001). Bundesgesetzblatt, 2001, No.89.
Patientenautonomie- und Integritätsschutzgesetzprojekt von Deutschland [Patient’s Will and Integrity Protection Law Project of Germany] (01.06.2005.). From: HÖFLING, W. (2006). Gesetz zur Sicherung der Autonomie und Integrität von Patienten am Lebensende (Patientenautonomie- und Integritätsschutzgesetz) [Act to Ensure the Autonomy and Integrity of Patients at the End of their Life (Patient’s Will and Integrity Protection Act)]. MedR, Iss: 1, p.25 – 32.
Patientenverfügungs-Gesetz von Österreich [Patients Order Act of Austria] (2006). Bundesgesetzblatt, 2006.8.Mai.
Patient’s Rights Charter of South Africa (1999). Retrieved March 11, 2015, from www.doh.gov.za/docs/legislation/patientsright/chartere.html.
SIMON, A., MERAN, J.G., FANGERAU, H. (2004). Patientenverfügungen als Instrument der Patientenselbstbestimmung [Patient’s Order as an Instrument of Patient Self-determination]. Der Hautarzt, Iss: 55, p.721 - 726.
The Judgement of the District Administrative Court (Riga) of Latvia, June 12, 2008, No. A42530306 A1201-08/5.
The Judgement of the Federal Supreme Court of Germany, March 17, 2003, No. BGHZ XII ZB 2/03. Retrieved March 11, 2015, from www.bundesgerichtshof.de.
TORGANS, K., GRUTUPS, A., VISNAKOVA, G. etc. (1998). Latvijas Republikas Civillikuma komentari: Ceturta dala. Saistibu tiesibas [The Comments on the Civil Law of Latvia: Fourth Part. Obligations Law]. Edit. Torgans, Kalvis. Riga: Mans Ipasums, 687 p.
T.U. (Re). The Consent and Capacity Board of Ontario province, Canada (The Ruling of April 25, 2005), 2005, No. CanLII 18189 (ON C.C.B.). Retrieved March 11, 2015, from http://www.canlii.org/en/on/onccb/doc/2005/2005canlii 18189/2005canlii18189.html.
Virginia Health Care Decisions Act, Code of Virginia. Retrieved March 11, 2015, from www.vsb.org/docs/sections/health/Summary-HCDA-2009.pdf.
ВАНЧУГОВА, В. "Биологическое завещание" положит конец страданиям неизлечимо больных людей [„Biological testament" will put an end to the suffering of untreatable people]. Retrieved March 11, 2015, from www.humanities.edu.ru/db/msg/24598.
Заключение Уполномоченного Этического Совета Европейской Ассоциации паллиативной помощи по вопросу паллиативной помощи и эвтаназии [Conclusion of the Commissioner of the Board of Ethics of the European Association for Palliative Care on palliative care and euthanasia]. (2003). Retrieved March 11, 2015, from www.pallcare.ru/ru/?p=1174132999.
