CHESS AS AN EDUCATIONAL TOOL FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION AND EMPLOYMENT

Authors

  • Andreas Ahrens Dr.-Ing. habil. (Electrical Engineering), Professor, Hochschule Wismar University of Applied Sciences Technology, Business and Design, Wismar (DE)
  • Antonia Castellani Senior researcher, Skill Up, Rome (IT)
  • Maria Chiara Di Francesco Junior researcher, Skill Up, Rome (IT)
  • Jelena Zascerinska Dr. paed., Leading researcher, Centre for Education and Innovation Research, Riga (LV) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4664-8593
  • Mihails Zascerinskis Scientific Assistant, Centre for Education and Innovation Research, Riga (LV)
  • Anastasija Bikova MA student, Hochschule Wismar University of Applied Sciences Technology, Business and Design, Wismar (DE)
  • Irina Abjalkiene Scientific Assistant, Centre for Education and Innovation Research, Riga (LV)
  • Olga Gukovica Scientific Assistant, Centre for Education and Innovation Research, Riga (LV)
  • Ludmila Aleksejeva Centre for Education and Innovation Research (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/jresd2024vol16.8268

Keywords:

categorisation, chess game, classification, disadvantaged groups, employment, prison inmates, social inclusion

Abstract

Purpose and aim of the study: The paper’s aim is to describe and analyse best practices in use of chess as an educational tool for enhancing disadvantaged groups’ social inclusion and employment in selected European countries. 
Design / Methodology / Approach: The methodology of descriptive research and study was employed in the present research. A focus group interview was leveraged as the method of data collection in May 2024. A total of 15 respondents from Latvia, Italy, and Spain participated in the interview. Categorisation as a classification method in a descriptive study was used for data analysis. 
Main Findings: The data analysis demonstrated that Italy and Spain utilised chess as an educational tool in a non-classical way, while Latvia continued to keep chess as an educational tool in a conventional manner.
Originality: The originality of the paper is shown by three categories of use of chess as an educational tool for disadvantaged groups. The categories were identified as target group, level of initiative, and classical/non-classical use of chess as an educational tool. 
Implications: The researcher community could invest more efforts into analyses of use of chess for social inclusion and employment of disadvantaged groups due to the chess game’s unique capabilities. 

Supporting Agencies
The presented work has been carried out within the Project "Including Chess as a Re-education Up-Skilling Tool" (ICARUS), KA220-ADU - Cooperation partnerships in adult education, Project Number 2023-1-IT02-KA220-ADU-000152409.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahrens, A., Gruenwald, N., Zaščerinska, J., & Melnikova, J. (2019). A Novel Design of the Pre-Processing Stage of Data Mining for Educational Purposes. Proceedings of the 9th BRCEBE & 12th ICEBE, Sibiu, România, 16 - 19 October 2019, 368-376.

Ahrens, A., Purvinis, O., Zaščerinska, J., Micevičienė, D., & Tautkus, A. (2018). Burstiness Management for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth: Emerging Research and Opportunities. IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5442-4

Ahrens, A., Zascerinska, J., Bikova, A., Aleksejeva, L., Zascerinskis, M., Gukovica, O., & Abjalkiene, I. (2024). Chess Play as a Means of Improving Inclusiveness of Disadvantaged Groups. Education. Innovation. Diversity, 1(8), 134 - 142.

Ahrens, A., Zascerinska, J., Zascerinskis, M., & Bikova, A. (2023). Gender Discrimination in Youth Employment: A Case Study in Germany. Journal of Regional Economic and Social Development, 15, 7-16.

Cano‐Hila, Ana Belén. (2022). Understanding Social Inclusion in Contemporary Society: Challenges, Reflections, Limitations, and Proposals. Social Inclusion, 10(2), 1–5.

Drisko, James W., & Tina Maschi. (2024). Interpretive Content Analysis, Content Analysis, Pocket Guides to Social Work Research Methods (New York, 2015; online edn, Oxford Academic, 19 Nov. 2015).

Dvoryatkina, S., & Simonovskaya., G.A. (2021). Using Chess for Identifying and Correcting “Problem Areas” in the School Math Course. TEM Journal, 10(1), 451-461. ISSN 2217‐8309, DOI: 10.18421/TEM101-57, February 2021.

Farquharson, C., McNally, S. & Tahir, I. (2022). Education inequalities. IFS Deaton Review of Inequalities.

Ferreira, D., & Palhares, P. (2008). Chess and problem solving involving patterns. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 5(2), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1105

Jankovic, A., & Novak, I. (2019). Chess as a Powerful Educational Tool for Successful People, In: Tipurić, Darko Hruška, Domagoj (Ed.): 7th International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship: Embracing Diversity in Organisations. April 5th -6th, 2019, Dubrovnik, Croatia, Governance Research and Development Centre (CIRU), Zagreb, 425-441.

Kitzinger, J. (1995). Education and debate Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995; 311:299-302 (29 July).

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, California.

Leinen, P. (2020). The importance of categories. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/importance-categories-patrick-leinen

Okoli, C., & Pawlovski, S. (2004). The Delphi Method as a Research Tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information and Management, 42(1), 15-29.

Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative, research & evaluation methods. Sage publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, California.

Robo, M. (2014). Social inclusion and inclusive education. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 10(2):181-191

Romanova, I., Vasylieva, M., & Podberezskyi, M. (2018). Chess therapy as a new trend in training of future social pedagogues. Journal of Physical Education & Sport, 18, 1820. DOI: 10.7752/jpes.2018.s4266

Seger, CA, & Peterson, EJ. (2013). Categorization = decision making + generalization. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Aug;37(7):1187-200.

DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.015

Senthil, B. Arul, & Ravindran, D. (2023). Relationship Between Chess and Management – An Overview. Journal Formation of Competencies of Gifted Individuals in the System of Extracurricular and Higher Education, 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.18372/2786-823.1.17464

Siu, K.W.M. (2010). Enhancing social inclusion: Universal chess design for blind people. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289782918_Enhancing_social_inclusion_Universal_chess_design_for_blind_people

Talend. (2024). What is data reliability? Definition and assessment guide. A Qlik Company.

United Nations. (2016). Leaving No One behind: The Imperative of Inclusive Development. Report on the World Social Situation 2016. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/rwss/2016/full-report.pdf.

White, J. (2012). Education and Well-being. In Susan David, Ilona Boniwell, and Amanda Conley Ayers (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Happiness, Section 6: Positive Education Chapter 41: Education and well-being. Publisher: Oxford University Press.

Zaščerinska, J., Aļeksejeva, A., Aļeksejeva, L., Gloņina, O., Zaščerinskis, M., & Andreeva, N. (2015). Formal Adult Education in Latvia: Focus Group Interview. In O. Clipa & G. Cramariuc (eds.), Educatia in societatea contemporana. Aplicatii (287-294). Iasi, Romania: Editura LUMEN.

Downloads

Published

14.12.2024

How to Cite

Ahrens, A. ., Castellani, A., Di Francesco, M. C., Zascerinska, J., Zascerinskis, M., Bikova, A., Abjalkiene , I. ., Gukovica, O., & Aleksejeva, L. (2024). CHESS AS AN EDUCATIONAL TOOL FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION AND EMPLOYMENT. Journal of Regional Economic and Social Development, 16, 8-20. https://doi.org/10.17770/jresd2024vol16.8268