ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL ASPECTS OF URBAN AGRICULTURE IN LATVIA – A CASE STUDY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/jresd2022vol14.6965

Keywords:

aspects, case study, Latvia, urban agriculture

Abstract

Urban agriculture is developing rapidly in the world, paying significant, often primary attention not only to the economic but also to the social and environmental functions of the practice. Urban agriculture in Latvia is relatively underdeveloped, most of the practice is realized in small amounts in households for self-consumption. Similarly, evaluating produced volumes and results in the context of commercial practice and community and public projects, it is in a developmental stage. Urban agriculture in Latvia has also been little researched so far, and the practice does not have a specific legal status that would enable precise determination of the scope of the practice, financial and trend analysis. However, the practice is developing, especially in the form of community gardens. The aim of this study is to determine and describe economic and social aspects of urban agriculture in Latvia. In order to achieve the aim, a systematic theoretical review was used to determine the definition and boundaries of the practice of urban agriculture, analysis and synthesis methods were used to identify and characterize trends, and a case study was used to summarize the economic and social aspects of the practice specific to Latvia. Results of the research confirm that social aspects dominate in urban agriculture in Latvia - in aims, motivation, functions and advantages of the practice. But in terms of risks, the most important are economic aspects, which are also the main hindering factors in the development of urban agriculture in Latvia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayambire R.A., Amponsah O., Peprah C., & Takyi S.A. (2019). A review of practices for sustaining urban and peri-urban agriculture: Implications for and use planning in rapidly urbanising Ghanaian cities. Land Use Policy, Vol. 84, 260-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.004.

Azunre G.A., Amponsah O., Peprah C., Takyi S.A. & Braimh I. (2019). A review of the role of urban agriculture in the sustainable city discourse. Cities, 93, 104-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.006.

Dobele M. & Zvirbule A. (2020). The concept of urban agriculture – historical development and tendencies, Rural Sustainability Research, 43 (338), 20-26. DOI:10.2478/plua-2020-0003.

Dobele M., Zvirbule A., & Dobele A. (2021a). A review of urban, peri-urban and rural agriculture concepts and role in sustainable development. Proceedings of the international scientific conference “Social Sciences for Regional Development 2020”, part III, Issues of economics, 59-66.

Dobele M., Zvirbule A., & Dobele A. (2021b). The motivation of urban agriculture practice – the case of Latvia. 21st International multidisciplinary scientific GeoConference SGEM 2021: conference proceedings of selected papers 2021, Issue 6.2: Green Design and Sustainable Architecture, 213-222. DOI: 10.5593/sgem2021V/6.2/s27.32.

Dobele M., Zvirbule A., & Dobele A. (2022). Legal aspects and institutional framework of urban agriculture in Latvia. Economic Science for Rural Development 2022, proceedings of the 23rd International scientific conference, 11-13 May 2002, 143-154, DOI: 10.22616/ESRD.2022.56.015.

Ekoskola – nākotnes skola. (n.d.). Retrieved Marc 4, 2022 from https://ekoskolas.lv/.

European Solidarity Corps. The power of together. (n.d.). Retrieved July 4, 2022, from https://youth.europa.eu/solidarity_en.

Ferreira A.J.D., Gulherme R.I.M.M., Ferreira C.S.S. & Oliveira M.F.M.L. (2018). Urban agriculture, a tool towards more resilient urban communities? Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 5, 93-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.coesh.2018.06.004.

Gagnon Y.-C. (2010). The Case Study As Research Method: A Practical Handbook. Quebec: Les Presses de l’Universitate du Quebec, p. 119.

Game I., & Primus R. (2015). Urban agriculture. Retrieved April 3, 2022, from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5764Urban%20Agriculture.pdf.

Hammelman C. (2017). Relying on Urban Gardens for Survival within the Building of a Modern City in Colombia. Global urban agriculture: convergence of theory and practice between North and South; ed. A.M.G.A. WinklerPrins. UK: CPI Group Ltd., CABI, 159-170.

Hotel Janne, SIA (n.d.). Retrieved April 4, 2022, from https://company.lursoft.lv/lv/hotel-janne/40203016720.

Kopienas augnīca (n.d.). Retrieved June 7, 2022, from https://company.lursoft.lv/lv/kopienas-augnica/40008304022.

Martinsuo M., & Huemann M. (2021). Designing case study research. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 39, 417-421. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.06.007.

Par programmu “Latvijas skolas soma”. (2022). Retrieved June 7, 2022, from https://www.lnkc.gov.lv/lv/par-programmu-latvijas-skolas-soma.

Par projektu. (n.d.). Retrieved June 7, 2022, from https://www.bisudraugs.eu/par-mums.

Pourias J., Aubry C., & Duchemin E. (2016). Is food a motivation for urban gardeners? Multifuncionality and the relative importance of the food function in urban collective gardens of Paris and Montreal. Agriculture and Human Values, Vol.33, 257-273.

Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. (1987). Retrieved March 20, 2022, from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf.

Seed Bombing darbnīca. (n.d.). Retrieved July 4, 2022, from https://www.rigabiennial.com/lv/education/riboca-talks/seed-bombing-workshop.

The 17 goals. (n.d.). Retrieved April 21, 2022, from https://sdgs.un.org/goals.

Thelwall M.,& Nevill T. (2021). Is research with qualitative data more prevalent and impactful now? Interviews, case studies, focus groups and ethnographies. Library and Information Science Research, Vol. 43, art. 101094. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101094.

Trendov N.M. (2018). Comparative study on the motivations that drive urban community gardens in Central Eastern Europe. Annals of Agrarian science, Vol.16, 85-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.aasci.2017.10.003.

Urban and peri-urban agriculture (n.d.). Retrieved March 22, 2022, from https://www.fao.org/urban-peri-urban-agriculture/en.

Urbānā biškopība – Rīgas Jumtu medus. (n.d.). Retrieved June 4, 2022, from http://hoteljanne.lv/bites/.

Veen E.J., Bock B.B., Van den Berg W., Visser A.J., & Wiskerke J.S.C. (2016). Community gardening and social cohesion: different designs, different motivations. Local Environment, Vol.21, Nu.10, p. 1271-1287. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2015.1101433.

Wohlin C., & Rainer A. (2022). Is it a case study? – A critical analysis and guidance. The Journal of Systems & Software, Vol.192, art. 111395. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.111395.

Woodside A.G. (2017). Case Study Research: Core Skills in Using 15 Genres. Second edition. Bingley, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, p. 538.

World review. Urban agriculture: an oxymorone? (1996). The State of Food and Agriculture. Rome: FAO, 43-94.

Downloads

Published

20.12.2022

How to Cite

Dobele, M. (2022). ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL ASPECTS OF URBAN AGRICULTURE IN LATVIA – A CASE STUDY. Journal of Regional Economic and Social Development, 14, 29-41. https://doi.org/10.17770/jresd2022vol14.6965