UNDERSTANDING OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE, ITS ACQUISITION AND STRENGTHENING IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/iss2021.6913Keywords:
acquisition, confirmation, criminal offense, electronic evidenceAbstract
Criminal investigations now face a new reality at the outset of criminal investigations. It involves the gathering of evidence, which has become more different than in previous decades. In line with the information and technology age, criminal investigations are increasingly finding that a large proportion of criminal offenses and criminal offenses are based on electronic evidence. The taking and consolidation of electronic evidence must take place in such a way that it can also be subject to existing general principles of law.Downloads
References
Konvencija par kibernoziegumiem (23.11.2001). Eiropas Padomes valstis, red. uz 14.04.2007. https://likumi.lv/ta/lv/starptautiskie-ligumi/id/1460-konvencija-par-kibernoziegumiem, sk. 14.10.2020.
Kriminālprocesa likums (21.04.2005). LR likums, red. uz 06.07.2020. https://likumi.lv/ta/id/107820-kriminalprocesa-likums, sk. 14.10.2020.
Уголовно - процессуальный кодекс Российской Федерации (2001). Закон Российской Федерации, № 174-ФЗ. Получено 05.04.2021 из http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102073942
Buko, A. (2020). Pierādījumu saglabāšanas principi IT vidē notikušos noziegumos. https://cert.lv/uploads/pasakumi/Aleksandrs_Buko_elektroniskie_pieradijumi_updated.pdf, sk. 14.10.2020.
Garrie, D.,B., Morrissy, J.D. (2014). Digital Forensic Evidence in the Courtroom: Understanding Content and Quality. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 12 (2), 121-128. Retrieved 26.04.2021 from https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article= 1218&context=njtip
Goodison, S. E., Davis, R. C., Jackson, B. A. (2021). Understanding digital evidence. Retrieved 05.04.2021 from https://www.iacpcybercenter.org/investigators/digital-evidence/understanding-digital-evidence/
Latvijas Republikas Augstākās tiesas Krimināllietu departamenta 2017.gada 30.novembra spriedums lietā Nr. SKK-320/2017. http://at.gov.lv/lv/tiesu-prakse/judikaturas-nolemumu-arhivs/kriminallietu-departaments/hronologiska-seciba?year=2017, sk. 30.04.2021.
Latvijas Republikas Rīgas rajona tiesas 2019.gada 28.augustā spriedums lietā Nr. K33-0116-19/14. https://manas.tiesas.lv/eTiesasMvc/lv/nolemumi, sk. 30.04.2021.
Ruddell, M. (2020). Just Science Podcast: Just Digital Evidence 101. Retrieved 05.04.2021 from https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/just-science-podcast-just-digital-evidence-101
Strada-Rozenberga, K. (red)., (2019). Kriminālprocesa likuma komentāri. A daļa. Rīga: Latvijas Vēstnesis.
Valsts administrācijas skola (2020). Baltijas reģionālais vebinārs par elektroniskiem pierādījumiem. https://www.vas.gov.lv/lv/jaunums/baltijas-regionalais-vebinars-par-elektroniskiem-pieradijumiem, sk. 20.04.2021.
Воронин, М. (2019). Электронные доказательства в УПК: быть или не быть? Науки Криминального Цикла, 7, 74-84. Получено 05.04.2021 из https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/elektronnye-dokazatelstva-v-upk-byt-ili-ne-byt