CIRCUMSTANCES AFFECTING QUALITATIVE EXECUTION OF JUDICIAL POWER IN CRIMINAL LITIGATIONS

Authors

  • Ilona Bulgakova Dr.iur., asociētā profesore, Rēzeknes Tehnoloģiju akadēmija (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/iss2019.5276

Keywords:

criminal litigation, criminal proceeding, judicial power, quality of judicial power,

Abstract

Representing both judicial and executive powers, institutions and officials take part in criminal litigations. In particular, the courts of the three instances, when executing judicial power, decide on person’s guilt or guiltlessness in relevant criminal cases. In pre-trial proceedings, judicial power is manifested through ensuring control on human rights’ limitation. In its turn, investigating bodies, which represent judicial power, ensure criminal actions’ investigating and submitting. Finally, punitive institutions (like administrative authorities of penal institutions, State probation service, as well as sworn court bailiffs) take part at the stage of executing the criminal punishment in criminal litigation, thus providing with the support implementing judicial power in criminal proceeding. The objective of this article is to identify and research the circumstances affecting qualitative implementation of judicial power in criminal litigation, a special attention is paid to the circumstances, which have negative affect on criminal litigation. The mentioned objective, in the author’s opinion, is extremely significant in theory and in practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Latvijas Republikas Satversme (15.02.1922.): LR likums ar groz. līdz 01.01.2019. http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=57980, sk.15.04.2019.

Kriminālprocesa likums (21.04.2005.). LR likums ar groz. līdz 25.10.2018. https://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=107820, sk.15.04.2019.

Krimināllikums (17.06.1998.). LR likums ar groz. līdz 07.11.2018., http://www.likumi.lv/doc.php?id88966, sk.15.04.2019.

Bulgakova, I. (2017). Krimināltiesvedības kvalitātes kritēriji un to pilnveide. Administratīvā un Kriminālā Justīcija, 4, 19.-31.lpp.

Latvijas Republikas Augstākās tiesas Senāts (2019). Augstākās tiesas darbības rādītāji 2018.gadā: kopsavilkums. www.at.gov.lv/tiesvedība/statistika/2018, sk. 30.04.2019.

Latvijas Republikas Prokuratūra (2019). Latvijas Republikas Prokuratūras darba rezultāti 2018.gadā. www.lrp.gov.lv/lv/noderīgi/statistika, sk. 30.04.2019.

Valsts policija (2019). 2018.gada pārskata prezentācija. http://www.vp.gov.lv/faili/jauna_mape/ vp_2018._gada_parskats.pdf, sk. 30.04.2019.

Баев, О.Я. (2007). Уголовно-процессуальное исследование преступлений: система и её качество. Москва: Издательство «Юрлитформ». 200 c.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-18

Issue

Section

Law Science