THE CONCEPT OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/het2022.26.6955Keywords:
classification, ecosystems, ecosystem services, evaluationAbstract
The world’s natural capital is shrinking faster and faster. Loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services is caused by changes in habitats, mainly due to land use change, the spread of invasive species, environmental pollution and climate change. Current unsustainable consumption and production patterns also contribute to the depletion of natural resources and threaten the services provided by ecosystems. At the moment, relatively little is said about ecosystem services, attempts have been made to gather the experience of different countries, but in reality only a few municipalities pay much attention to this issue.Downloads
References
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, (2020)
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., Müller, F. (2012). Mapping ecosystemservice supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators 21, 17–29.
Burkhard, B. and Maes, J. (eds), (2017). Mapping Ecosystem Services. Pensoft Publishers Ltd, Sofia.
Haines-Young, R. and M.B. Potschin (2018). Revision of the Common International Classification for Ecosystem Services (CICES V5.1): A Policy Brief. One Ecosystem 3: e27108.
http://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/IPBES-4-INF-13_EN.pdf
Kasparinskis, R., Ruskule, A., Vinogradovs, I, Miguel Villoslada Pecina. (2018). Ievads par ekosistēmu pakalpojumu un tā pielietojumu integrētajā plānošanā, rokasgrāmata. Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte, Ģeogrāfijas un Zemes zinātņu fakultāte.
SWD (2019) 305, https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/?fuseaction=list&coteId=10102&year=2019&number=305&version=ALL&language=lv
http://riks.ekosistemas.daba.gov.lv/teorija/#1
Rekomendācijas ekosistēmu pakalpojumu pieejas integrēšanai teritoriju plānošanā, Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde, https://ekosistemas.daba.gov.lv
Sander J., Burkhard B., Toon D., Jan S., Anik S. (2014). The Matrix Reloaded: A review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling 295: 21–30, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380014004141.
Biotopu un sugu aizsardzības labvēlīga statusa atjaunošanas pasākumu sociāli ekonomiskais novērtējums. (2019). Enviroprojekts.
Daily G.C. (1997). Nature´s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press: Washington, D.C.
https://www.mf.llu.lv/sites/mf/files/files/lapas/Metodikas%20vadl%C4%ABnijas.pdf
Pagiola, S., & Platais, G. (2007). Payments for environmental services. Environment Strategy Notes, 3(4), 1-23.
Asafu-Adjaye J., Phillips W., Adamowicz W. L. (1989). Towards the Measurement of Total Economic Value: The Case of Wildlife Resources in Alberta. University of Alberta, Department of Rural Economy, Wildlife conservation, Issue 89, Part 16, 27.
