SUSTAINABLE ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE, ITS TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS

Authors

  • Julija Steinhart Business Management, BA School of Business and Finance (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2024vol1.8011

Keywords:

sustainable organizational performance, bibliometric analysis, bibliometrix, development, trends

Abstract

The interest in sustainable organizational performance has increased strongly in the last decade. With the rising macroeconomic pressure and unforeseen circumstances such as global pandemic, an increased number of economies battle to ensure prosperity, performance, and target trans-formation.

The aim of this study is to spot trends and developments on sustainable organizational performance observed in the academia for the last decade. More precisely, main sources of publications as well as biases within geographical, citation, authorship and thematic dimensions are to be identified. To achieve this aim, a qualitative study based on bibliometric analysis has been performed.

In total, 1286 relevant articles were retrieved for the last decade that examined sustainable organizational performance, however none of them has implemented a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis and elaborate on progress within academic research. The bibliometric analysis within this study is based on a literature review of publications obtained from Scopus using an inclusive search strategy. In addition, the visualization of the data was carried out with the use of Bibliometrix and VOSviewer.

The article strives to contribute to the research on sustainable organizational performance, while performing keywords and co-occurrence analysis. It further defines top productive authors, structure of the research topic in the journals and countries. In addition to that, Lotka analysis has been performed to understand the interactions and structure of publications of the subject area.

The importance of the organizational framework, management and governance were identified as main keywords underlying once again that functional framework provides structure and hierarchy the entity may build on, while effective management ensures the utilization of resources within the established framework. Oversight, in turn, is organized by governance that guides both the framework and management practices.

The study comes with the conclusion and recommendations for both business and academia.

 ;

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

H. Ahir, N. Bloom, and D. Furceri, “THE WORLD UNCERTAINTY INDEX,” Cambridge, Working Paper 29763, 2022. Accessed: Aug. 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w29763/w29763.pdf

M. A. Hossin, M. S. Hosain, M. F. Frempong, S. S. Adu-Yeboah, and M. A. A. Mustafi, “What drives sustainable or-ganizational performance? The roles of perceived organiza-tional support and sustainable organizational reputation,” Sus-tainability (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 22, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132212363.

A.-C. Stanciu, M. Constandache, and E. Condrea, “Concerns about the Sustainable Performance of Firm in the Context of Quality Management Systems Implementation,” Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 131, pp. 340–344, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.127.

M. Klassen, G. A. Wilson, and C. B. Dobni, “The long game of innovation and value creation,” Journal of Business Strate-gy, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 183–190, 2023, doi: 10.1108/JBS-02-2022-0035.

I. Mavlutova, A. Spilbergs, A. Verdenhofs, A. Natrins, I. Arefjevs, and T. Volkova, “Digital Transformation as a Driver of the Financial Sector Sustainable Development: An Impact on Financial Inclusion and Operational Efficiency,” Sustaina-bility, vol. 15, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15010207.

J. M. Paes, L. F. Scavarda, P. Ceryno, and E. Machado, “Human technology organizational dimensions for sustainable logistics: a context mechanism outcome model,” Brazilian Journal of Operations and Production Management, vol. 19, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.14488/BJOPM.2022.002.

S. Kraus, M. Breier, and S. Dasí-Rodríguez, “The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship re-search,” International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, vol. 16, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4.

V. Bolbot, K. Kulkarni, P. Brunou, O. V. Banda, and M. Musharraf, “Developments and research directions in mari-time cybersecurity: A systematic literature review and biblio-metric analysis,” International Journal of Critical Infrastruc-ture Protection, vol. 39, p. 100571, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2022.100571.

“Scopus.” Accessed: Aug. 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus/how-scopus-works/content

L. Syhyda et al., “Investigating the Role of Innovation in Inclusive and Sustainable Development in Ukraine and South Korea,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 14, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151411195.

S. B. Nielsen, S. Lemire, I. Bourgeois, and L. A. Fierro, “Mapping the evaluation capacity building landscape: A bibli-ometric analysis of scholarly communities and themes,” Eval Program Plann, vol. 99, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102318.

F. Biermann, N. Kanie, and R. E. Kim, “Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals,” Current Opinion in Environmental Sus-tainability, vol. 26–27. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010.

J. Zhu and W. Hua, “Visualizing the knowledge domain of sustainable development research between 1987 and 2015: a bibliometric analysis,” Scientometrics, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 893–914, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2187-8.

F.-F. Cheng, Y.-W. Huang, H.-C. Yu, and C.-S. Wu, “Map-ping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence and so-cial network analysis: Evidence from Library Hi Tech be-tween 2006 and 2017,” Library Hi Tech, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 636–650, 2018, doi: 10.1108/LHT-01-2018-0004.

M. Young and V. Dulewicz, “Similarities and Differences between Leadership and Management: High-Performance Competencies in the British Royal Navy,” British Journal of Management, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 17–32, Mar. 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00534.x.

S. Yang, L. Zhang, and L. Wang, “Key Factors of Sustainable Development of Organization: Bibliometric Analysis of Or-ganizational Citizenship Behavior,” Sustainability (Switzer-land), vol. 15, no. 10, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15108261.

Y. Wang and H. Zhang, “Achieving sustainable new product development by implementing big data-embedded new prod-uct development process,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 11, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12114681.

S. Bag, J. H. C. Pretorius, S. Gupta, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Role of institutional pressures and resources in the adoption of big data analytics powered artificial intelligence, sustaina-ble manufacturing practices and circular economy capabili-ties,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 163, p. 120420, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120420.

S. H. Raza, U. Zaman, M. Iftikhar, and O. Shafique, “An experimental evidence on eco-friendly advertisement appeals and intention to use bio-nanomaterial plastics: Institutional collectivism and performance orientation as moderators,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020791.

M. Rafiq, S. Naz, J. M. Martins, M. N. Mata, P. N. Mata, and S. Maqbool, “A study on emerging management practices of renewable energy companies after the outbreak of covid-19: Using an interpretive structural modeling (ISM) approach,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 6, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13063420.

N. A. Gardberg and C. J. Fombrun, “Corporate Citizenship: Creating Intangible Assets Across Institutional Environ-ments,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 329–346, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.5465/amr.2006.20208684.

Sushma Rani and Mishra K, “Green HRM: Practices and Strategic Implementation in the Organizations,” International Journal IJRITCC, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 3633–3639, 2014.

V. López-López, S. Iglesias-Antelo, and E. Fernández, “Is sustainable performance explained by firm effect in small business?,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 1 – 13, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su122310028.

M. H. Mansour, S. M. Alshourah, K. A. A. Al Zeaideen, and A. S. Alsaraireh, “Relationship Between High-Performance Work Practices (Hpwps) And Achieving Organizational Ex-cellence,” Quality - Access to Success, vol. 24, no. 194, pp. 95 – 101, 2023, doi: 10.47750/QAS/24.194.11.

R. Adams, S. Jeanrenaud, J. Bessant, D. Denyer, and P. Overy, “Sustainability-oriented Innovation: A Systematic Re-view,” International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 180–205, Apr. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068.

J. M. Kneipp, C. M. Gomes, R. S. Bichueti, K. Frizzo, and A. P. Perlin, “Sustainable innovation practices and their relation-ship with the performance of industrial companies,” Revista de Gestão, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 94–111, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1108/REGE-01-2018-0005.

E. Dommerholt, M. Soltanifar, and J. Bessant, “Impact of sustainable innovation on organizational performance.,” 2021. doi: 10.4324/9780429299506.

G. Afeltra, S. A. Alerasoul, E. Minelli, Y. Vecchio, and C. Montalvo, “Assessing the Integrated Impact of Sustainable Innovation on Organisational Performance: An Empirical Ev-idence From Manufacturing Firms,” Journal of Small Business Strategy, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 143–166, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.53703/001c.38515.

N. Marulanda-Grisales and O. D. Figueroa-Duarte, “Classify-ing and studying environmental performance of manufactur-ing organizations evidence from Colombia,” J Clean Prod, vol. 279, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123845.

N. Setiawan et al., “A proposal of performance measurement and management model for 5S sustainability in manufacturing SMEs: A Review,” Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems and Manufacturing, vol. 15, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1299/JAMDSM.2021JAMDSM0017.

R. G. Eccles, I. Ioannou, and G. Serafeim, “The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and per-formance,” Manage Sci, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2835 – 2857, 2014, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984.

S. Evans et al., “Business Model Innovation for Sustainabil-ity: Towards a Unified Perspective for Creation of Sustaina-ble Business Models,” Bus Strategy Environ, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 597 – 608, 2017, doi: 10.1002/bse.1939.

M. Geissdoerfer, S. N. Morioka, M. M. de Carvalho, and S. Evans, “Business models and supply chains for the circular economy,” J Clean Prod, vol. 190, pp. 712 – 721, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159.

A. N. El-Kassar and S. K. Singh, “Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practic-es,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 144, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.016.

C. C. J. Cheng, C. Yang, and C. Sheu, “The link between eco-innovation and business performance: a Taiwanese industry context,” J Clean Prod, vol. 64, pp. 81–90, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.050.

A. J. Lotka, “The frequency distribution of scientific produc-tivity,” Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 317–323, 1926, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24529203

W. Zhi and G. Ji, “Constructed wetlands, 1991-2011: A review of research development, current trends, and future di-rections,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 441, pp. 19–27, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.09.064.

I. Lapiņa, I. Borkus, and O. Stariņeca, “Corporate Social Responsibility and Creating Shared Value: Case of Latvia,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, In-ternational Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Eco-nomic, Business and Industrial Engineering, vol. 6, pp. 2228–2234, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:7781596

A. Medne, I. Lapiņa, and A. Zeps, “Challenges of Uncertain-ty in Sustainable Strategy Development: Reconsidering the Key Performance Indicators,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14020761.

X. Huang, Z. Hu, C. Liu, D. Yu, and L. Yu, “The relation-ships between regulatory and customer pressure, green organi-zational responses, and green innovation performance,” J Clean Prod, vol. 112, pp. 3423–3433, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.106.

P. R. de Sousa et al., “Challenges, Opportunities, and Lessons Learned: Sustainability in Brazilian Omnichannel Retail,” Sus-tainability, vol. 13, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13020666.

I. Hristov and A. Chirico, “The role of sustainability key performance indicators (KPIs) in implementing sustainable strategies,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 20, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11205742.

F. Findler, “Scoping What Matters: An Introduction to Im-pact Mapping,” in Business and the Sustainable Development Goals: Measuring and Managing Corporate Impacts, N. Schönherr and A. Martinuzzi, Eds., Cham: Springer Interna-tional Publishing, 2019, pp. 55–74. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-16810-0_3.

L. De Amicis, S. Binenti, F. Maciel Cardoso, C. Gracia-Lázaro, Á. Sánchez, and Y. Moreno, “Understanding drivers when investing for impact: an experimental study,” Palgrave Commun, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 86, 2020, doi: 10.1057/s41599-020-0447-y.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-22

How to Cite

[1]
J. Steinhart, “SUSTAINABLE ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE, ITS TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS”, ETR, vol. 1, pp. 339–347, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.17770/etr2024vol1.8011.