SOCIAL WORK STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE RELEVANCE OF THEIR STUDIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2024vol1.8000Keywords:
attitudes, learning process, support, relevance, social work, studyAbstract
Social work education is the cornerstone of preparing students to address complex social problems with professional competence and ethical sensitivity. As the field of social work develops, it is imperative to understand social work students' attitudes towards the relevance of their studies to real world practice. Aim of the research - to explore social work students' attitudes towards the relevance of their academic studies to real-world social work practice.
Research subject - Social work students' attitudes towards the relevance of their studies. Research objectives: 1) identify the relevance of the study; 2) to explore how social work students perceive the relevance of their studies to their future professional practice. The study is based on a quantitative methodology, using a survey questionnaire to collect data from 97 students enrolled in a bachelor's degree programme in social work at a Lithuanian higher education institution. The study used descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and Kruskal-Wallis test to analyse the data. The results showed that students found the study process relevant and meaningful for their personal and professional development. Students generally appreciated the opportunity to apply their knowledge in real-life situations to improve their professional skills. However, state-funded students rated the study process as more relevant than non-state-funded students. The paper concludes that programmes can be attractive to social work students if they are designed and delivered in a way that promotes students' interest in their studies, the application of theory to practice, and support from lecturers and peers. This study contributes to the literature on social work education in higher education by providing insights into social work students' perceptions of the relevance of the study process.
Downloads
References
National Association of Social Workers, “NASW standards for social work practice,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.socialworkers.org/Practice/Standards-Guidelines [Accessed: March. 12, 2024].
G. N. Tippa and S. Mane, “Social Work Students Empowerment through Field Work Practicum: Reflections of Social Work Education,” The International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 468-478.
T. Leiber, B. Stensaker, and L. C. Harvey, “Bridging theory and practice of impact evaluation of quality management in higher education institutions: a SWOT analysis,” Impact Evaluation of Quality Management in Higher Education, p. 117-132, 2020. [Abstract]. Available: Routledge, [Accessed: March. 12, 2024], https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2018.1474782
M.ª. Á. Minguela-Recover, P. Munuera, R. Baena-Pérez, and J. M. Mota-Macías,“ The role of 360º virtual reality in social intervention: a further contribution to the theory-practice relationship of social work studies, “ Social Work Education, vol. 43, no. 1, p. 203-223, 2024.
N. Thompson. Understanding social work: Preparing for practice. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2024.
J. Caspersen and J. C. Smeby, “Placement training and learning outcomes in social work education, “Studies in Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 12, p. 2650-2663, 2021.
I. Taylor, M. Bogo, M. Lefevre, and B. Teater (Eds.). Routledge international handbook of social work education. Abingdon: Routledge, 2016.
P. Field, C. Jasper, and L. Littler. Practice education in social work: Achieving professional standards. Critical Publishing, 2016.
J. Parker. Social work practice: Assessment, planning, intervention and review. London: Learning Matters, 2020.
V. Denvall and M. Skillmark, “Bridge over troubled water—closing the research–practice gap in social work,” The British Journal of Social Work, vol. 51, no. 7, p. 2722-2739, 2021.
P. Sung‐Chan and A. Yuen‐Tsang, “Bridging the theory–practice gap in social work education: a reflection on an action research in China,“ Social Work Education, vol. 27, no. 1, p. 51-69, 2008.
K. Resch and I. Schrittesser,“ Using the Service-Learning approach to bridge the gap between theory and practice in teacher education,“ International Journal of Inclusive Education, vol. 27, no. 10, p.1118-1132, 2023.
G. Holden, K. Barker, and G. Rosenberg, “A social work education outcome measure: The Evaluation Self-Efficacy Scale–II,” SAGE open, vol. 7, no. 3, 2017.
K. Zgoda and K. Shane, “Digital literacy in social work education: A case study incorporating technology and social media within the social work curriculum,” Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, vol. 8, no. 1, 2018.
T. La Rose and B. Detlor, “Social work digital storytelling project: Digital literacy, digital storytelling, and the makerspace,“ Research on Social Work Practice, vol. 31, no. 6, p. 599-609, 2021.
A. Taylor, “Social work and digitalisation: Bridging the knowledge gaps,” Social Work Education, vol. 36, no. 8, p. 869-879, 2017.
E. Cabiati and M. L. Raineri, “Learning from service users’ involvement: A research about changing stigmatizing attitudes in social work students,” in Service User Involvement in Social Work Education, Routledge, 2019, p. 123-137.
C. Keerthigha and S. Singh, “The effect of teaching style and academic motivation on student evaluation of teaching: Insights from social cognition,” Frontiers in psychology, vol. 13, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1107375.
N. R. Templeton, S. Jeong, and E. Pugliese, “Mentoring for continuous improvement in teaching and learning,” Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 1-5, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2021.1902709.
N. Eltaiba and A. Ndoye, “The effectiveness of field education in social work education: A student perspective,” Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 170-184, 2018.
C. Hitchcock, M. Hughes, L. McPherson, and L. Whitaker,” The role of education in developing students’ professional resilience for social work practice: A systematic scoping review,” The British Journal of social work, vol. 51, no. 7, p. 2361-2380, 2021.
R. Hamilton, “Work-based learning in social work education: the challenges and opportunities for the identities of work-based learners on university-based programs,” Social Work Education, vol. 38, no. 6, p. 766-778, 2019.
ALLEA - All European Academies, The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, Berlin, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.allea.org/wp- content/uploads/2017/05/ALLEA-European-Code-of -Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017.pdf [Accessed: March 13, 2024].
C. Davis, R. Greenaway, M. Moore, and L. Cooper, “Online teaching in social work education: Understanding the challenges,” Australian Social Work, vol. 72, no. 1, p. 34-46, 2018.
J. Bae, P. F. Jennings, C. P. Hardeman, E. Kim, M. Lee, T. Littleton, and S. Saasa, “Compassion satisfaction among social work practitioners: The role of work–life balance,” Journal of Social Service Research, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2019.1566195.
A. Fairtloughm. Professional leadership for social work practitioners and educators. Routledge, 2019.
M. Tomlinson, “Student perceptions of themselves as ‘consumers’ of higher education,” British Journal of Sociology of Education, vol. 38, no. 4, p. 450-467, 2017.
N. Gould and I. Taylor, Reflective learning for social work: research, theory and practice. Routledge, 2017.
M., Doel and S. M. Shardlow, Modern social work practice: Teaching and learning in practice settings. Routledge, 2017.
H., Lei, Y. Cui, and W. Zhou, “Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis,” Social Behavior and Personality: an international Journal, vol. 46, no. 3, p. 517-528, 2018.
Y. B. Rajabalee and M. I. Santally, “Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 2623-2656, 2021.
F. Kamran, A. Kanwal, A. Afzal, and S. Rafiq, “Impact of interactive teaching methods on students learning outcomes at university level,” Journal of Positive School Psychology, vol. 7, no. 7, p. 89-105, 2023.
H. J. Cho, M. R. Melloch, and C. Levesque-Bristol, “Enhanced student perceptions of learning and performance using concept-point-recovery teaching sessions: a mixed-method approach,” International Journal of STEM Education, vol. 8, p. 1-17, 2021.
M. Cents-Boonstra, A. Lichtwarck-Aschoff, E. Denessen, N. Aelterman, and L. Haerens, “Fostering student engagement with motivating teaching: An observation study of teacher and student behaviours,” Research Papers in Education, vol. 36, no. 6, p. 754-779, 2021.
C. Morley and C. O’bree, “Critical reflection: An imperative skill for social work practice in neoliberal organisations?” Social sciences, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 97, 2021.
W. Green, “Engaging students in international education: Rethinking student engagement in a globalized world, “Journal of Studies in International Education, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 3-9, 2019.
M. A. Qureshi, A. Khaskheli, J. A. Qureshi, S. A. Raza, and S. Q., “Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 31, no. 4, p. 2371-2391, 2023.
K. Aldrup, B. Carstensen, and U. Klusmann, “Is empathy the key to effective teaching? A systematic review of its association with teacher-student interactions and student outcomes,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 34, no. 3, p. 1177-1216, 2022.
S. Brookfield, “Teaching our own racism: Incorporating personal narratives of whiteness into anti-racist practice,” Adult Learning, vol. 25, no. 3, p. 89-95, 2014.
C. K. Kwan and A. Reupert, “The relevance of social workers’ personal experiences to their practices,” The British Journal of Social Work, vol. 49, no. 1, p. 256-271, 2019.
T. Kourgiantakis, K. M. Sewell, and M. Bogo, “The importance of feedback in preparing social work students for field education,” Clinical Social Work Journal, vol. 47, p. 124-133, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Renata Kondratavičienė, Inga Bertašienė, Diana Mačiuikienė
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
