ECOLOGICAL AND ECONOMICAL SUBSTATIATION OF PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2021vol1.6540Keywords:
hydrogen, ecology, bioenergy, biohydrogen, natural gasAbstract
Hydrogen production from biomass may become one of the leading areas of bioenergy in Ukraine soon.Currently, the main direction of biomass energy production in Ukraine is the production of thermal energy for distributed heat supply of enterprises and private households by burning biomass of wood and agricultural origin. Nowadays in Ukraine, there is a technology for the production of biohydrogen. We calculated the environmental and economic effects of hydrogen production as a source of energy. We have come up with the following conclusion that if there is a demand for the final product, hydrogen production will be attractive from economic standpoint and will not require a green tariff or other support from the government.The market price of biohydrogen will be $ 4-5 per kg and will be comparable to that which the European Union aims to achieve.We assume that hydrogen may be a cleaner source of energy for end users, especially in the transport sector in the future.
One of the main issues of Ukraine's possible participation in Europe's hydrogen energy program as a supplier and producer of renewable hydrogen is the possibility of its technically safe and cost-effective transportation to EU countries.
As the main hypothesis considered transportation of hydrogen using the gas transmission system of Ukraine as part of a mixture with natural gas. Calculations show that, of course, obtaining energy from hydrogen, even in mass production, will be more expensive than alternative traditional and non-traditional methods. The development of this technology, in any case, is promising in terms of the development of energy independence and environmental development of states. The effect of scale in mass production of hydrogen energy should also work, which will significantly reduce the cost of this technology.
Downloads
References
Dudnikov, D., etal., Hydrogen energy techmologies.М.: OIVT RAN, 2017. Rel. 1. 190 с.
Perederiy, N., Kuzmenko, S., Labenko, O., Energy-saving technologies in agriculture of Ukraine. Quantitative methods in economics.Volume XVII, No. 4, 2016, p. 89-100. [Online]. Available: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=473655. [Accessed Jan. 24, 2021].
Kovalenko, V., Kovalenko, N., Labenko, O., Faichuk, O. and Faichuk, O. ,Bioenergy sustainable development: achieving the balance between social and economic aspects. E3S Web of Conferences 154, 2020, 07008. [Online]. Available: https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/abs/2020/14/e3sconf_icores2020_07008/e3sconf_icores2020_07008.html. [Accessed Jan. 21, 2021].
Malyshenko, S.P., Borzenko, V.I., Dunikov, D.O., Nazarova, O.V., Metal hydride technologies of hydrogen energy storage for independent power supply systems constructed on the basis of renewable sources of energy. Thermal Engineering, 2012, Т. 59, № 6. p. 468-478.
Energy club. [Online]. Available:https://iclub.energy. [Accessed Jan. 25, 2021].
The Hydrogen Economy: Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs. National Research Council and National Academy of Engineering. 2004. [Online]. Available: https://www.nap.edu/read/10922/chapter/1#ii. [Accessed Jan. 25, 2021].
International Monetary Fund. [Online]. Available: https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDP_RPCH@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD. [Accessed Jan. 25, 2021].
Tsina vodniu z VDE vyroblenoho v YeS ta SShA mozhe buty zmenshena maizhe vdvichi do 2050r. [The price of hydrogen from RES produced in the EU and the US could be reduced by almost half till 2050]. [Online]. Available:
https://expro.com.ua/novini/cna-vodnyu-z-vde-viroblenogo-v-s-ta-ssha--buti-zmenshena-mayje-vdvch-do-2050r. [Accessed Jan. 26, 2021].
Mohut li vodorodnye avtomobili sostavit konkurentsiiu elektromobiliam? [Can hydrogen cars compete with electric cars?].[Online]. Available: https://e-move.com.ua/mogut-li-vodorodnye-avtomobili-sostavit-konkurenciyu-elektromobilyam/. [Accessed Jan. 31, 2017].
Tryhuba, A.; Hutsol, T.; Tryhuba, I.; Pokotylska, N.; Kovalenko, N.; Tabor, S.; Kwasniewski, D. Risk Assessment of Investmentsin Projects of Production of Raw Materials for Bioethanol. Processes 2021, 9,12, doi:10.3390/pr9010012.
Tryhuba, A.; Bashynsky, O.; Hutsol, T.; Rozkosz, A.; Prokopova, O. Justification of Parameters of the Energy Supply System of Agricultural Enterprises with Using Wind Power Installations. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference – Renewable Energy Sources (ICoRES2019), E3S WebConf, 2020, Volume154, 06001, doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202015406001.
Huber, G.W.; Dumesic, J.A. Anoverviewofaqueous-phasecatalyticprocessesforproductionofhydrogenandalkanesinabiorefinery. Catal. Today 2006, 111,119–132,doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2005.10.010.
Zhou, C.; Xia, X.; Lin, C.; Tong, D.; Beltramini, J.Catalyticconversionoflignocellulosicbiomasstofinechemicalsandfuels.Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40,5588–5617,doi:10.1039/C1CS15124J.
Kayfeci, M.; Keçebaş, A.; Bayat, M. Hydrogenproduction. Solar Hydrog. Prod. Process. Syst. Technol. 2019,45–83,doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-814853-2.00003-5.
Nikolaidis, P.; Poullikkas, A. Acomparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 67,597-611, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.044.
Ishaq, H.; Dincer, I. Comparative assessment of renewable energy-based hydrogen production methods. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 135, 110192, doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110192.
Golub, G.; Skydan, O.; Kukharets, V.; Yarosh, Y.; Kukharets, S. The estimation of energetically self-sufficient agroecosystem’ smodel. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2020, 21, 168–175, doi:10.5513/JCEA01/21.1.2482.
Meng Ni, M.;Leung, D.Y.; Leung, M.K.; Sumathy, K. An overview of hydrogen production from biomass. Fuel Process. Technol. 2006, 87, 461–472, doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.11.003.
Diachuk, О.; Chepeliev, М.; Podolets, R.; Trypolska, G.; oth.Transition of Ukraine to the Renewable Energyby 2050. In Heinrich Boell Foundation Regional Office in Ukraine; Publishing house “ArtBook” Ltd.: Kyiv, Ukraine, 2017; Volume 88. Available online: https://ua.boell.org/sites/default/files/transition_of_ukraine_to_the_renewable_energy_by_2050_1.pdf (accessed on 1 November 2017).
Tryhuba, A.; Hutsol, T.; Glowacki, S.; Tryhuba, I.; Tabor, S.; Kwasniewski, D.; Sorokin, D.; Yermakov, S. Forecasting Quantitative Risk Indicators of Investors in Projects of Biohydrogen Production from Agricultural Raw Materials. Processes 2021, 9, 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9020258
Mohammad, T.A.; Aqsha, A.; Mariam, A.; Ain, S.; Hellgardt, K.; Sumaiya, Z.A.; Farooq, S. Catalytic reforming of oxygenated hydrocarbons for the hydrogen production: Anoutlook.Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2020, 127, 109852, doi:10.1007/s13399-020-01081-6.
Yermakov, S.; Hutsol, T.; Mudryk,K.; Dziedzic, K.; Mykhailova, L. The analysis of stochastic processes in unloading the energy willow cuttings from the hopper. Environment, Technology, Resources. In Proceedings of the 12th International Scientific and Practical Conference, Rezekne, Latvia, 2019; pp.249–252, doi:10.17770/etr2019vol3.4159
Dziedzic, K.; Mudryk, K.; Hutsol, T.; Dziedzic, B. Impact of Grinding Coconut Shell and Agglomeration Pressure on Quality Parameters of Briquette; Engineering for Rural Development:Jelgava, Latvia, 2018; pp.1884–1889, doi:10.22616/ERDev2018.17.N461.
